Jewish American Heritage Month

Posted By simmons on November 1, 2015

Yale University historian Timothy Snyder is indebted to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who recently made Snyders new book even more newsworthy than his extraordinary scholarship deserves to be. And Netanyahu is indebted to Snyder, whose theory of Hitlers anti-Semitism is germane to two questions: Is the Iranian regimes anti-Semitism rooted, as Hitlers was, in a theory of history that demands genocide? If so, when Iran becomes a nuclear power, can it be deterred from its announced determination to destroy Israel?

Netanyahu recently asserted, again, that a Palestinian cleric was important in Hitlers decision to murder European Jews. Netanyahu said that on Nov. 28, 1941, when Hitler supposedly preferred to expel Europes Jews rather than exterminate them, Haj Amin al-Husseini, grand mufti of Jerusalem, met with Hitler and urged him to burn them.

Certainly the mufti favored genocide; he certainly was not important in initiating it. Mass murder the Holocaust accompanied the German army, especially after the September 1939 outbreak of war, and especially after the June 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union. Granted, it was not until the January 1942 Wannsee Conference that the final solution became explicit. But by the time Hitler met the mufti, approximately 700,000 Soviet Jews had been shot. Snyder, not Netanyahu, should be heeded concerning the Holocausts genesis.

Attempts to explain Hitlers obsession with Jews began with the idea that he was unfathomable, a lunatic Teppichfresser (carpet eater). The comforting theory was that no theory can explain Hitler because he was inexplicable, a monster, a phenomenon without precedent or portent.

In 1996, however, Daniel Goldhagens book Hitlers Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust argued that the explanation for the genocide was acculturation centuries of German conditioning by the single idea of eliminationist anti-Semitism. This cognitive determinism reduced Hitler to a mere catalyst who unleashed a sick societys cultural latency.

In an October 20 speech to the World Zionist Congress, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, gave Adolf Hitler the idea to exterminate Jews during WWII. (YouTube/IsraeliPM)

This drew a rejoinder from Christopher Browning, author of Ordinary Men (1992), a study of middle-aged German conscripts who became consenting participants in mass-murder police battalions in Poland. Browning noted that protracted socialization centuries of conditioning could not explain the Khmer Rouges murder of millions of Cambodians or the Chinese slaughter of millions of Chinese during Maos Cultural Revolution.

What happened in those places proved the power of an idea Marxism understood as a mandate to extirpate false consciousness to legitimize, even mandate, mass murder. In Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning, published in September, Snyder argues that the Holocausts origins have been hidden in plain sight, in ideas Hitler articulated in Mein Kampf and speeches.

Snyder presents a Hitler more troubling than a madman, a Hitler implementing the logic of a coherent worldview. His life was a single-minded response to an idea so radical that it rejected not only the entire tradition of political philosophy but also the possibility of philosophy, which Hitler supplanted by zoology.

In Hitlers world, Snyder writes, the law of the jungle was the only law. The immutable structure of life casts the various human races as separate species. Only races are real and they are locked in mutual and unassuageable enmity, in Hitlers mind-set, because life is constant struggle over scarcities of land, food and other necessities.

One group, however, poisoned the planet with another idea. To Hitler, says Snyder, It was the Jew who told humans that they were above other animals, and had the capacity to decide their future for themselves. To Hitler, Ethics as such was the error; the only morality was fidelity to race. Hitler, who did not become a German citizen until 11 months before becoming Germanys chancellor, was not a nationalist but a racialist who said the highest goal of human beings is not the preservation of any given state or government, but the preservation of their kind. And all world-historical events are nothing more than the expression of the self-preservation drive of the races.

Now, assume, reasonably, that Irans pursuit of a potentially genocidal weapon will not be seriously impeded by parchment barriers such as the recent nuclear agreement. And assume, prudently, that the Iranian regime means what it says about Jews and their Zionist entity.

Then apply Snyders warning: Ideas have consequences. The idea of anti-Semitism is uniquely durable and remarkably multiform. It can express a mentality that is disconnected, as in Hitlers case, from calculations of national interest.

Hence an anti-Semitic regime can be impervious to the logic of deterrence. Much, including Israels calculation of what military measures are necessary for its safety, depends on the nature of Irans anti-Semitism.

Read more from George F. Wills archive or follow him on Facebook.

Original post:
Does Irans anti-Semitism run too deep for deterrence ...

Category: Anti-Semitsm
Tags: