Page 1,114«..1020..1,1131,1141,1151,116..1,1201,130..»

Rare genetic mutation leaves people at higher risk for multiple cancers – Penn: Office of University Communications

Posted By on July 21, 2020

Rare inherited mutations in the bodys master regulator of the DNA repair systemthe TP53 genecan leave people at a higher risk of developing multiple types of cancer over the course of their lives. Now, for the first time, a team led by researchers in theBasser Center for BRCAat theAbramson Cancer Center details the potential implications of a lower risk TP53 mutation, including an association with a specific type of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), an inherited predisposition to a wide range of cancers. The findings raise questions about how to appropriately screen patients for this mutation and whether the standard process of full-body scans for LFS patients should be modified for this group, since their risk profile is different than those with classic LFS. The researchers published their findingsinCancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

Mutations in the TP53 gene are the most commonly acquired mutations in cancer. The p53 protein, made by the TP53 gene, normally acts as the supervisor in the cell as the body tries to repair damaged DNA. Different mutations can determine how well or how poorly that supervisor is able to direct the response. The more defective the mutation, the greater the risk. When TP53 mutations are inherited, they cause LFS, a disease that leaves people with a 90 percent chance of developing cancer in their lifetime. There are currently no therapies that target the p53 pathway.

Researchers determined that there is an inherited set of genetic material shared among people who have this mutation, suggesting its whats called a founder mutationa mutation that tracks within one ethnicity. In this case, that ethnicity is the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Due to the wide variety of disease types associated with inherited TP53 mutations and the early age of cancer diagnoses, cancer screening is exceptionally aggressive. However, we do not yet know if all mutations require the same high level of screening, says the studys senior authorKara N. Maxwell, an assistant professor of hematology-oncology and Genetics in thePerelman School of Medicine and a member of the Abramson Cancer Center and the Basser Center for BRCA. It is therefore critical to study the specifics of individual TP53 mutations so we can understand how best to screen people who carry lower risk mutations.

Read more at Penn Medicine News.

The rest is here:

Rare genetic mutation leaves people at higher risk for multiple cancers - Penn: Office of University Communications

Letters to the Editor, July 20, 2020: Free money – The Jerusalem Post

Posted By on July 21, 2020

Regarding Money giveaway scheme highlights discord (July 17), we should thank Mr. Netanyahu for all of his service to the country over the years, but it is time he stepped down to allow the next generation to develop and take the needed steps in these difficult times.Handing out money to those who do not need it does not trigger economic growth. It increases national debt and interest on loans the next generation will pay.Why after months of experience gained in the fight against corona do we look like we are unprepared for the current wave of corona? Why are good people like MK Naftali Bennett and others who performed well cast aside when we need them?DOUGLAS HANDELMANJerusalemOld Chinese (?) proverb: How do you know that you are going to the polls soon? When the ruling party hands out money to its citizens like candy.ARYEH ZETLERYokneamOur unemployment rate is 21%. My math indicates that 79% are gainfully employed, yet this government wants to give money to all. This is clearly not an economic benefit. That leads one to conclude that the decision was made for political reasons to boost Netanyahus rating. Once again he shows what his priorities are.STANLEY CANNING Kibbutz Kfar HamaccabiEnriching Ehud BarakRegarding Amotz Asa-Els column What do they want from Wexner? (July 17) and the allegations made by Yair Netanyahu as well as the motivations that Asa-el attributes to Netanyahu the father, the title begs the question of an overseas private foundation gifting Israeli civil servants. There remain unasked and unanswered questions. The law, as I understand it, prohibits gifting civil servants. The Wexner program offers not only a years tuition at the prestigious Kennedy School of Government, it also provides round-trip airfare for the awardee, his/her spouse and minor children. It provides free medical insurance for the entire family in addition to a living allowance and round-trip container transport. The sum total of all these benefits is by no means insignificant. Which raises a number of additional questions unaddressed by Asa-el. What is the vetting process for the program? In addition to the prominent names mentioned in the article, are there any data detailing distribution by geographic, socioeconomic and ethnic (Ashkenazi, Mizrahi, Ethiopian) parameters?Asa-Els sarcastic defense of the Wexner program and its more-than-generous remuneration to Ehud Barak (while technically kosher still reeks to high heaven) notwithstanding, the contractual association with a governmental body should be subject to public scrutiny.For the record, US President Donald Trump never said that the race rioters at Charlottesville included very fine people. That that quote was taken out of context is documented fact. JOEL KUTNERJerusalemBeinarts boondoggleRegarding Beyond Beinarts states of the mind (July 17), does Peter Beinart really expect Zionists to throw in the towel? Does he expect them to accept a binational state where Jews would soon be in a minority status?What possible reason would any Jew want to return to the pre-1948 condition?For 2,000 years Christians have persecuted Jews. Jews have been looted, expelled and murdered at the whim of their Christian masters. They have been treated as renewable resources to be robbed, allowed to re-build and be robbed again. The Islamic world treated Jews the same way for the past 1,400 years.There were two major cataclysms in my lifetime, the Holocaust and the expulsion of 1,000,000 Jews from Muslim lands. Why would any Jew trust that this ingrained pattern will not repeat itself?Israel serves as a safe haven for Jews. It is also an enormous success. It is a cultural, intellectual and technological dynamo that is attracting immigrants who want, rather than need, to settle there. The Palestinian Arabs will or will not develop their own state based on the American Peace to Prosperity plan. Israel will move forward. It will not be kicked around. It can take care of itself.LEN BENNETTOttawa, OnBack to no futureRegarding Israel bests Germany (July 15), letter writer David Smith correctly criticizes MK Yair Lapids misrepresentation of statistical data about pandemic effects in Germany as compared to Israel, thereby denigrating Israel internally and to rest of the world. Smith suggests that one has to rethink on the name of the Yesh Atid Party. I think I have a more appropriate name for it: the Ein Atid PartySHLOMO FELDMANNGivatayimMASKulinity: The scienceConcerning your articles about wearing a mask outside, it is important to note new scientific findings about protection against this disease: Speech droplets are the primary vehicle for transfer of the viral particles from an affected person to a near-by individual. The two-meter social distancing practice is suitable for a closed space. However, in a light wind (such as on the beach) the virus can travel three times further. Oral droplets containing viral particles can remain in the air for as long as 14 minutes or more, long after the infected person may have left a normal conversation. Loud singing or speaking can emit thousands of oral droplets per second, thereby increasing the viral load in the air. Swabs used to collect throat samples for testing typically contain more viral particles when taken via the nose than the mouth. Thus, leaving the nose uncovered by a mask is potentially more dangerous than an uncovered mouth. The viability of the virus outside the body when deposited on plastic, such as a water bottle, is 6.8 hours.GARY STEINMAN, MD, PHDJerusalemVexed by the vetoRegarding Palestinian seeking path to circumvent US veto at UNSC (July 16), the UN was long ago hijacked by oil-rich countries that back hostile UN actions against Israel, while actively and very indulgently supporting the Palestinians.Addressing the UN Security Council in December 2016, UN secretary-general said, Over the last decade I have argued that we cannot have a bias against Israel at the UN. Decades of political maneuvering have created a disproportionate number of resolutions, reports and committees against Israel.Now, the Palestinians are seeking a path to circumvent the US veto at the Security Council so they can block Israel from formally declaring sovereignty over portions of Judea and Samaria from which the indigenous Jews were ethnically cleansed after the 1948 war. This manipulative maneuver should surprise no one.Consider The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN in 1948. The world became increasingly dependent on oil, and in 1990 the Organization of Islamic Cooperation issued the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, which declared that The Islamic Sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration. This conflicts with international human rights enacted by the UN, but no one seems concerned.However, the American veto, a fundamental right of US membership in the Security Council, is now a source of great concern at the UN, with pressure to somehow override or cancel it at the whim of the Palestinians, the Arab bloc, and those dependent on them for oil.We should all be very concerned about this attempt at hijacking. It would mean the death of the UN.JULIA LUTCHDavis, CASo the Palestinians are upset that a single country can circumvent the vote of many states at the UN. Dont they always play by different rules than those that apply to everyone else?Wasnt Jordans illegal 19-year occupation of eastern Jerusalem and Judea, demanding that no Jew could live there perfectly fine? Shouldnt Palestine refugees (millions of people claiming descent from Arabs who purportedly fled the area decades ago) be treated differently from all other refugees in the world, with refugee status passing from one generation to the next in perpetuity, remaining on the worlds dole until they get homes they assert that their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents lost? (UNHCR considers five years a prolonged stay in a refugee camp).And arent all parties to a conflict allowed to insist that signing a peace treaty doesnt necessarily mean that the war is over?The Oslo Accords envisioned Area C becoming part of Israel 20 years ago. The world has allowed the Palestinians to exercise their privilege far too long.TOBY F. BLOCKAtlanta, GAThe EUs anti-Israel manEUversRegarding EU building for Palestinians in Area C (July 15), by the time the government decides to implement Israeli law in Area C, there wont be any land to implement sovereignty over. It will all have been taken over by the EU and the ArabsIs the government really powerless to prevent this illegal building or is it taking action?HERBERT KOPPELJerusalemBARImetric pressure at the NYTRegarding Bari Weiss resigns from New York Times (July 15), Winston Churchill wrote: Courage is the first of human qualities because it is the quality that guarantees all others. Bari Weisss resignation from the Times is exactly what Churchill was referring to.RICHARD SHERMANMargate, FloridaWhile I am appalled (but not surprised) at the low level of partisan muck into which the formerly great New York Times has evidently sunk, I am proud of Israels English-language paper of record, The Jerusalem Post, which continues to publish articles and letters that reflect a broad range of views and foster a rigorous discussion of ideas.Please continue to provide intelligent discussion from all shades of opinion (even though I feel that a few of your op-ed columnists fall more than a bit short of the intelligent discussion standard).ARLENE FAUNCEBat YamReform schoolStop the insults (July 14) calls out the prime ministers son for his insulting language something that can be agreed upon. Accordingly, I fail to understand why Rabbinical reform (July 12) can be highly insulting to Chief Rabbi Yosef. One may differ with some of his words but why threaten with defunding the Chief Rabbinate and tell him to get packing? Would you dare write in a similar tone about Supreme Court justices? They cant even be probed by the Knesset. It is ironic that the non-Orthodox branches of Judaism are presiding over a 70% rate of intermarriage and yet they are not called to order. Tragically, their youth for the most part is not interested in Israel and most dont even know about the Western Wall and its various sections. I love our non-religious Jewish brothers and therefore urge them to examine themselves. YITZCHOK ELEFANTChief rabbi of DimonaIn the editorial, Rabbinical reform (July 12), the writer criticizes Sephardi Chief Rabbi Yitzchak Yosef for his negative view of Reform Judaism. The writer says that we should be tolerant of all forms of Judaism.Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac Herzog, who was Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, called Reform Judaism a new Christianity. Rabbi J. B. Soloveitchik of Boston who was a leading Modern Orthodox Rabbi in America, stated that Reform Judaism had contributed to a spiritual Holocaust in America. These are powerful words indeed, from two prominent rabbis who are not considered to be extreme.EPHRAIM STEINJerusalemRegarding Rabbi should know Jews indigenous, scholar says (July 13), Reform Rabbi Andy Kahn freely offers an outrageous public service announcement. It seems we Jews are not who we thought we were. We ignorantly and blissfully prayed three times a day for thousands of years to return to our native homeland, said Next year in Jerusalem at every occasion and faced the direction of Jerusalem when we prayed only to find out that we were really mistaken. Why, we could have taken Uganda as a homeland when it was offered. We are not indigenous to the land of Israel proclaims this expert historian. (Either are the Palestinians, he says.) Whew, good that he cleared that up.Apparently we need to ignore the Torah, archaeology and the work of so many esteemed historians who stubbornly cling to this notion of Jewish indigenousness.Kahn is sadly in good company with Palestinians who insist that they were here first. The level of his historical acumen and his ability to pervert the truth are on par with Holocaust deniers (who know it never happened but are ready to remedy that lapse).It was prophesied long ago that our enemies would come from within. It would be an unpleasant job, but it seems that Kahn and his ilk have nevertheless stepped up to the task.This representative of Reform leadership exemplifies what many of us understood all along. The early reformers wrote that they were merely trying to make Judaism more palatable for the masses. Indeed, they made something more palatable but it wasnt Judaism. As the article said, A rabbi should know better.YEHUDIT LIPNER Jerusalem

Read more:

Letters to the Editor, July 20, 2020: Free money - The Jerusalem Post

How Jews Beat the Heat – Aish

Posted By on July 21, 2020

Whatever you do, dont go for a picnic. Jews dont picnic.

It is a hot summer out there and I am here to help.

My whole life, as an American Jew, I have tried to figure out ways to stay out of the sun. Then, I moved to Israel and realized that I made my problem worse.

I am not a climatologist but from what I have read, for the foreseeable future, there will be summers. Thus, I traveled back to America to study the Jewish communitys techniques for staying out of the sun. And now, as a pale Ashkenazi Jew, I bring you my findings.

Used by Jews to ward off anti-Semites, this kippah decoy also serves as a sun protection device. Truth be told, a baseball hat is a basically a yarmulke with a visor.

According to many, Hank Greenberg is the greatest Jewish hitter of all time. Whos to say Hank Aaron is not Jewish? This has nothing to do with our topic of the summer but it makes Jews feel good when we find out famous people are Jewish.

Go to the beach and find shade. Almost impossible. This is why you need to find a huge umbrella. This way you can be at the beach and not have to experience the beach. Its the best of both worlds.

During the summer we use gigantic umbrellas, but in the fall its back to small umbrellas. Dont make the same mistake I made by using a huge umbrella in the fall. The wind picked me up and carried me a few blocks until I cried out shema yisrael and I was miraculously dropped in my backyard.

You want to wear a funky hat so you can look like Justin Timberlake at the beach? Sunburn. You want to look like your rabbi with a big black Borsalino fedora at the beach? No sunburn. Its as simple as that.

This is a new method I have seen Jews using the past few months, covering their mouth. This of course will protect your mouth from getting a sunburn. Its kind of like a ski mask, but without the North Face emblem. By the way, recently I learned that its an American Jewish tradition to have all winter clothes with the North Face emblem.

I have never in my life witnessed a Jewish family out for a picnic. This is because picnicking is the easiest way to get a sunburn. You might as well hold the grill to your face. Jews wait to eat until we find the pizza shop; there is no sun in there.

The Dont Picnic technique might have developed because we like eating off tables, and not on bed sheets. Also, we Jews like chairs detached from tables, not attached to a bench. We need room when we sit. The foot hole to get your body into the picnic bench takes too much stretching and agility, and my family just doesnt have it.

Sunscreen must be placed by mothers in enormous quantities. A good Jewish mother ensures that the white cream is visible everywhere on the body. Including under the hat. If your child looks like Casper the Friendly Ghost, the application has been a success.

I have seen many of my fellow Jews insist on wearing winter clothes during the summer. Its like natural sunscreen. You also look better in winter clothes. At least I do. Also, with a sweater you take off more weight in the sun by sweating. Another Jewish benefit by wearing winter clothes in the summer you save money on having only one wardrobe.

Good Jews dont wear sunglasses. We squint.

Do everything during the evening and squint; the street lights can have a sunlike affect.

Stay up all night and pray at sunrise. Then go to sleep. Its like a European siesta but all day long, and lets face it, we Jews need the rest.

Our homes in the city dont provide enough shade. For this reason, many go to The Mountains and build a home. This is a little more expensive than the hat methods, but it does keep the sun out of the eyes. Three hundred thousand dollars to get yourself out of the sun for a month seems like a wise investment. Or you could just buy sunscreen.

This is a great way to stay out of the sun during the winter. This works well for Ashkenazi Jew until they reach seventy. Then they want sun all the time. That is when they move to Florida for the winter. Or if they are smart, Israel. Celebrating seasons in the wrong time, when your neighbors cant, gives you something to feel good about. When you reach seventy, you need people to look down on.

Theres a famous story of the Jewish boy who goes to the beach with his parents and his mother yells, Dont go in the water, its cold, youll catch pneumonia Dont play in the sand, it will get in your eyes Dont look at the sun, youll squint. She then turns to a stranger, What a nervous child. It is thanks to great Jewish parents like these that we can go through the summer and never have to experience the heat.

Read this article:

How Jews Beat the Heat - Aish

As a gay Jew, I may face discrimination – but I still have white privilege – Forward

Posted By on July 21, 2020

For as long as I can remember, being Jewish has been my primary identity. Once I came out in my early 40s, I embraced being gay as my second primary identity. I am proud to be both. Yet, why am I reluctant about being white?

Growing up I never thought about this. You could count the number of non-white students in my Elementary school on one hand. And so I saw myself as white becausewhat else could I be?

Yet, eventually I realized that I didnt really think of myself as white. The reason was clear. To me, white was equated with white and ChristianI was not part of the Christian majority, therefore, I wasnt truly white.

Culturally, this was nothing new. For years Jews were not seen as, nor considered themselves to be, white. Jews were a separate race. It wasnt until the mid-twentieth century that this began to change, as Jews became more successful and well-educated. Of course, this narrative does not apply to the 12-20% of American Jews who are people of color. I am referring to the Ashkenazi Jewish American community, of which I am a part.

Not considering myself to be white is not about skin color, but instead about my sense of identity and belonging. Yet, if I dont see myself as white, does that mean I dont benefit from white privilege or in any way perpetuate white supremacy?

Following the events in Charlottesville in 2017, in which a woman was killed during the Unite the Right Rally, I wrote a blog post which addressed the conundrum that Jews are both targeted by white supremacist hate while at the same timesince most of us present as whitewe benefit from white privilege.

I am not pulled over for driving in the wrong neighborhood, nor am I followed by store security guards. I am not ignored or spoken over by others in the room. People dont cross the street when they see me walking towards them; they dont challenge my right to be swimming in a pool, watching birds in the park or walking in my own neighborhood. No one assumes, in a restaurant or hotel, that I am an employee. My job applications are not passed over because of my name.

Most powerful of all: as a parent, I never needed to have the talk with my children, especially my son, about how to act if they are stopped by police. I have never needed to worry that they might get profiled while out at night, or, accused, arrested or killed because of the color of their skin.

That is white privilege. It has nothing to do with socio-economic status. It is simply based on skin color.

This is not new. Our countrys unfair system of policing and incarceration originated in order to preserve slavery and later to control former slaves. Redlining, inequitable property taxes and employment regulations are all ways that white Americans have been privileged over Black Americans and other people of color.

Its not just about white supremacist hate groups. Its about the fact that our country was founded on the self-evident truths that all white people, especially men, were supreme. Eventually, Ashkenazi Jews became widely accepted as white, even if anti-Jewish hatred and violence continued. The descendants of enslaved Africans and other people of color did not achieve that same level of communal acceptance.

Cory Booker urged the Jewish and Black communities to unite in fighting violence and prejudice during a candid conversation with Jodi Rudoren. Missed it? Watch here.

There is something insidious about this. As a Black friend pointed out, the acceptance of Jews and others as white simply gave whites a stronger majority and more power to systemically oppress Blacks.

It would be easy for me to say that I bear no guilt for our national sin of slavery, since my ancestors didnt arrive until around 1900. However, in the words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, In a free society, some are guilty, but all are responsible. As a Jew, I may not carry guilt, but my white privilege means I still bear a responsibility to help dismantle the racist system.

As a gay Jew, I know that anti-Jewish and homophobic rhetoric and violence are both still present and increasing. Yet, I also know that when walking down the street, I am probably seen as white, and assumed to be Christian and straight. So I dont feel afraid.

In the past, I could have been arrested in America for being gay (and still can be elsewhere), and as a Jew I would have been forbidden to attend certain schools or belong to certain clubs. Yet, our nation was not created to oppress us as it was Black people.

I am proudly Jewish and gay; though both groups experience prejudice and persecution, we rise up and prevail in the face of hatred and violence and I am proud to stand tall under the banner of these identities.

However, I have no pride in being accepted as part of white America, which has built our unjust system. I have no pride in the fact that I dont have to worry when walking down the street because of the whiteness of my skin.

But it doesnt matter how I feel about being seen as white. De facto, I am white. I have a personal responsibility to not only fight racism, but to dismantle white supremacy. This begins by learning all I can about how and why systemic racism and white supremacy came to exist.

It is also my responsibility to help others in the Jewish and LGBTQ communities to understand our responsibility. Then, we need to work together with Black Americans and all people of color to break down the system and rebuild it from the ground up. Only then can we all truly dwell in one nation under God. Only then can all of us realize the self-evident truth that all humans are created in the image of God. Only then will everyone in our country treat one another with equity, compassion and justice for all. Only then will America truly be great.

Rabbi Steve Nathan is the Director of Jewish Student Life and Associate Chaplain at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA. He was ordained by the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, has a Masters Degree in Counseling Psychology and has studied Midrashic storytelling with Peninnah Schramm and Mindfulness meditation with Rabbis Jeff Roth and Sheila Peltz Weinberg. His Torah commentaries, original midrash, poetry and more can be found at http://www.mindfultorah.org.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Read more here:

As a gay Jew, I may face discrimination - but I still have white privilege - Forward

Thousands of protesters in Israel call on Netanyahu to resign – Deutsche Welle

Posted By on July 21, 2020

Thousands of Israelis on Tuesday protested outside the official residence of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, demanding the embattled leaderstep down as he faces a trial on corruption charges and as his government comes under fire over its handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

Protesters, defying orders to maintain social distancing requirements, chanted slogans and blew horns outside Netanyahu's residence. Anti-corruption activists had set up tents outside his home on Monday.

Some demonstrators carried placards that read: "Netanyahu's corruption makes us sick," "Netanyahu, resign," and "crime minister." Many held posters, saying: "You are detached. We are fed up," or saying there is "no way" a politician under indictment can be a head of state.

At least 50 people were arrested for the alleged involvement in the protests.

Reserve General Amir Haskel, one of the protest organizers, called on people to gather on July 14, the "231st anniversary of the French revolution" to "demand liberty, equality and fraternity."

Protester Laurent Cige, who came from Tel Aviv to participate in the demonstration, told French news agency AFP: "The most deadly virus is not COVID-19, but corruption."

Read more:What will Israel's West Bank annexation plans mean for the region?

Police said they were in force on the scene trying to restore order. Towards the end of the protest, security authorities clashed with some protesters in a small confrontation.

Late in the evening, several hundred protesters marched through central Jerusalem, with some blocking the city's rail line.

The protest took place as Israel's Health Ministry announced more than 1,400 new cases of the coronavirus in the past 24 hours.

Thousands also protested in Tel Aviv on Saturday against Netanyahu's economic policies amid the coronavirus crisis.

A country of some 9million people, Israel has registered more than 41,200 coronavirus cases with 368 deaths.

Read more:How are new coronavirus hot spots being contained?

Netanyahu's downfall

Netanyahu, who has been prime minister of Israel for over a decade, has seen his popularity plummet in recent weeks as he comes under fire from all directions.

Critics say he reopened the economy too quickly as Israel is now experiencing a surge of new COVID-19 cases. The country's unemployment figure remains above 20% and opponents say the out-of-touch leader has failed to help thousands of struggling Israelis.

Unemployment has jumped from 3.4% in February to 27% in April, before declining slightly in May to 23.5%.

Netanyahu faces his next trial date at a Jerusalem district court on July 19. He was indicted in January for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in three cases. He stands accused of receivinglavish gifts from billionaire friends and of trading favors with media moguls for more positive coverage of himself and his family.

On March 15, Netanyahu's corruption trial was delayed for two months due to concerns about the coronavirus outbreak.

Netanyahu denies wrongdoing and has refused to resign, maintaining that the charges were a ploy to drive him from office.

In May, Netanyahu formed a new coalition government with retired military chiefs Benny Gantz and Gabi Ashkenazi after more than a year of political unrest.

Under Israeli law, a ruling prime minister is only required to resign if convicted of a criminal offense with all appeals exhausted. Analysts say that in Netanyahu's case, this could take several years.

mvb/dr (AP, AFP, dpa)

Read more here:

Thousands of protesters in Israel call on Netanyahu to resign - Deutsche Welle

Will Jewish schools finally address their segregationist past? – Forward

Posted By on July 21, 2020

In the two months since George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police, American Jewish day schools have begun to rethink how they teach students about the brutal legacy of American racism.

Among the subjects theyll have to examine? Their own history.

As the day school movement has expanded, its created a deep passion about the need for institutions that, in a secularized America, affirm and enrich Jewish identity. For day school communities, its impossible to imagine that the educational model that dominated the first half of the 20th century in which Jewish students attended public schools and received supplemental Jewish education might be a sufficient incubator of religious and cultural character.

But the origins of some day schools, particularly those founded in and after the 1970s, are connected to a dark narrative of 20th century American history: That of the backlash among white families against the racial integration of public schools. And as day schools reconsider how they teach students about the realities of American racism, they face questions about how those realities intersect with their own institutional heritage.

The Jewish day school movement was founded when the U.S. public schools integrated, said Ilana Kaufman, executive director of the Jews of Color Initiative, in a June 21 conversation hosted by Temple Emanuels Streicker Center, because there was white flight from U.S. public schools.

The actual story, say historians, is a little more complicated. (Kaufman did not respond to requests for comment.) As European immigration expanded the American Jewish population around the turn of the 19th century, said Jonathan Sarna, a professor of Jewish history at Brandeis University, American Jews developed the sense that the public school was crucial to the making of Americans, that it was truly un-American not to send your children to public school. For decades, attending public school was something Jewish immigrants and their children saw as a matter of principle. Jews were very proud that in America the schools accepted Jews, there were no quotas, everybody studied together, Sarna said.

In the late interwar period, that began to change. The day school movement starts in the 20s and the 30s, said Jonathan Krasner, a Brandeis professor currently writing a history of Jewish day schools. That, according to Krasner, was the first of several discrete periods in the evolution of the day school system. Next came a really big push in the post-war era, primarily from the Orthodox community. There were a lot of refugees that came here just before or after the war, and they didnt have the same allegiance to public schools, Krasner said. They were influenced more by things like the Holocaust and the creation of the state of Israel, events that, for some, prompted a renewed interest in ensuring that new generations would cultivate a strong Jewish identity.

But the day school movement didnt blossom until the 1960s and 70s, an era that proved particularly fruitful for community schools, non-Orthodox institutions catering to students who, while discontented with the public school system, were unlikely to attend rigorously religious alternatives.

What lay behind that discontent? One major and frequently forgotten factor, Sarna said, was the mass flight of Evangelicals into private schools after Supreme Court decisions in 1962 and 1963 effectively banned prayer from public schools. That exodus, Sarna said, dealt a serious blow to the Jewish belief in public schools: How could they truly be said to be essential to the American character, if so many of their students were abandoning them?

At the same time, much of American Jewry was on the economic ascent, entering class ranks in which private schools were increasingly considered the norm. The fear was, if we dont have Jewish schools, Jews will simply go to those private schools run by Protestants, Sarna said. And, in the late 60s, the country was transfixed by incidents like the Ocean Hill-Brownsville conflict, in which a predominantly Black school district in Brooklyn terminated the contracts of a number of white, Jewish teachers, drawing allegations of anti-Semitism and prompting a two-month-long teacher strike. Those very, very well publicized incidents suggested to Jews that the public schools were no longer friendly to Jews, Sarna said.

But in many communities particularly urban ones, according to Krasner the decisive moment for day schools came in the early 1970s, as the Supreme Court issued a series of decisions mandating that school districts use busing to integrate schools. (Brown v. Board of Education, the 1954 case establishing that school segregation was unconstitutional, didnt address the de facto school segregation that resulted from Black and white people living in largely different neighborhoods.) The impact of those decisions was particularly visible in Los Angeles, said Sara Smith, Assistant Dean at the Graduate Center for Jewish Education of American Jewish University.

Before busing, there were two Conservative elementary day schools in L.A., Smith said. After, there were five. Before busing, there was one Reform elementary day school in L.A. After busing, there were two. The increased number of schools wasnt the only indicator that Jewish parents were fleeing the public school system for the day school system: Enrollments skyrocketed, too.

There was really a sense community rabbis certainly spoke about this that on the one hand we as Jews should be supporting integration, because thats a value that we hold, Smith said. But, she said, there was a real fear and paranoia from parents who didnt want to send their kids to be bused across the city to go to schools that were going to be populated by non-whites. Between 1966 and 1980, Smith wrote in her 2017 NYU doctoral dissertation, the number of white students enrolled in Los Angeles public school system decreased by 269,373. That reduction was accompanied by a rise in the number of local private schools. Jewish students, and Jewish schools, were clearly identifiable participants in that change.

To date, Smiths dissertation is the only intensive work of scholarship on the intersection between the desegregation of public schools and the rise of Jewish day schools. But Rivka Press Schwartz, a research fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute of North America and associate principal at Riverdales SAR High School, is sure that the pattern Smith identified in L.A. was replicated across the country. There is a great deal of evidence of people moving to the suburbs, pulling their kids out of public schools and putting them in private schools, Schwartz said. It is 100% true that Jewish parents, then and now, cared about their kids Jewish education, and sacrificed to afford their kids a meaningful Jewish education. But it can also be true that if your neighborhood public school was all of a sudden about to be subject to busing, then sending your kid to a Jewish school might appeal more.

Were adults, she said, and more than one thing can be true at the same time.

How should the day school system reckon with this history? First, said Krasner, its important to note the scale of the issue, which largely doesnt involve Orthodox schools; the Orthodox commitment to day schools, he said, is more fundamental than any change that took place within American society. A 2013-2014 survey by the Avi Chai Foundation, Krasner said, suggested that about 13% of Jewish day school students in the U.S. attend non-Orthodox schools. A fair proportion of those schools were founded before the start of desegregation efforts, meaning that the number of schools whose history was genuinely informed by a rejection of desegregation may be comparatively small.

For those schools, what comes next? The legacy is the legacy, and thats the way that it happened. And, these institutions have done many great things for Jewish identity for many people, Smith said. To meaningfully grapple with their history when it comes to race, she said, schools have to start thinking about real intentional ways to build bonds that dont just feel like service. Too often, she said, day schools fail to place value on cultivating student relationships with those from other communities. In her view, its time for that value to become central to day school curriculums.

What do we do with complicated, painful parts of our history? Schwartz asked. While shes worked to incorporate a more comprehensive education about structural racism into SARs curriculum, shes long had the sense that turning the conversation to the origins of the day school system would be unproductive. Pirkei Avot says, dont say something that cant be heard, she said. I did have the sense this was something that couldnt be heard.

But in the last three months, Schwartz said, those around her have suddenly become more interested in the issue of day school origins. So far, she said, discussions around that subject have been preliminary; the educators in her sphere, preoccupied with the difficult educational conditions imposed by the coronavirus pandemic, have yet to begin planning around whether and how to incorporate that history in their teaching. There are certain things that make it hard for the Jewish community to come into this conversation, she said. Its not just youre racist, or youre clueless, or youre living out your lives as upper middle class white people. There genuinely are things that make it very difficult, which the people who want to make this conversation happen have to also think about.

Smith says that as she wrote her dissertation, she spoke with the founders of several of the Los Angeles schools whose histories she was researching. They werent surprised by what she was uncovering, she said, but they also werent particularly interested in it. I think people understood that these schools are able to exist and thrive because of busing, and that was just the way that it was, she said. Now I think were turning back, and trying to understand, ok, how did we get here?

Read more here:
Will Jewish schools finally address their segregationist past? - Forward

Leading evangelical says no annexation could cost Trump election. Others disagree. – Forward

Posted By on July 21, 2020

WASHINGTON (JTA) Israels potential annexation of parts of the West Bank may not be a top election issue for American Jews, or even a top issue right now for most Israelis.

But some evangelical Christians in America are hoping to make it an animating issue for evangelical voters in this falls presidential election.

Thats especially true for Mike Evans, the evangelical writer who founded a museum celebrating Christian supporters of Israel, the Friends of Zion Heritage Center in Jerusalem. His Jerusalem Prayer Team Facebook page has more than 73 million followers.

This year, Israel is going to be the number one thing they take into the voting booth, and Ill tell you why, Evans told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency this week. The one thing that unites all evangelicals concerning Israel is Genesis 12:3: I will bless them that bless thee and curse them that curse thee. So Ive got 73 million evangelicals on my Jerusalem Prayer Team Facebook site alone, and I know them. The only thing they believe they can do to get God to bless them is to bless the land of Israel.

The flipside, Evans said, is that if Trump stands in the way of annexation, he could face a backlash from evangelicals at the voting booth.

But exactly how many evangelical voters there are, and how much they are animated by the annexation issue, is unclear.

Gallup citing the proportion of people who answer yes to the question Would you describe yourself as born-again or evangelical? says evangelicals have for decades comprised just over 40% of the population. And a 2017 poll commissioned by pro-Israel evangelicals found that the percentage of evangelicals who believe that the establishment of Israel was a fulfillment of prophecy was astronomically high 80%.

Elizabeth Oldmixon, a University of North Texas political scientist who studies evangelicals and their relationship to Israel, has estimated that about a third of evangelicals are likely to put Israel policy at the center of their electoral decision-making. (Other issues that drive evangelical voting include abortion rights and religious liberty.)

Oldmixon told Vox in 2018 that a subset of the evangelical community for whom the status of Israel is really, really important because of the way they understand the end of time would constitute about 15 million people.

But many of those voters might have been satisfied by Trumps moves already. Sarah Posner, an author who has written about the evangelicals affinity for Trump, said evangelicals were not likely to be preoccupied with the ins and outs of annexation.

Theyre very happy with the embassy move and are not going to give up on judges and policy they have long sought to enact (here) over annexation, she said. Honestly, I think most evangelicals dont truly understand the annexation issue and were more wowed by something like the embassy move.

Last month two pro-Israel evangelical leaders, Robert Jeffress and Joel Rosenberg, told The New York Times that evangelicals were indifferent to annexation and that they even might turn on Trump if he blesses annexation and it triggers regional turmoil.

I dont see any pickup among evangelical voters for this move, and theres a risk that you could lose some evangelical votes, in the very states where you might be more vulnerable, Rosenberg told the newspaper.

Notably, these figures might be heeding whispered counsel from the Israeli leaders with whom they are close who, despite their public statements, may be eager to avert a drastic step at a time that Israel is coping with a second wave of the coronavirus, and increased tensions with Iran.

But Rosenberg outlined in a detailed paper posted on his website that it was conversations with Palestinian and Arab leaders that had given him the most pause. He wrote that unilateral annexation would heighten instability in the country that evangelicals care so much about.

Now would be a good time to be praying for the peace of Jerusalem and the region, and praying that Israeli and American leaders will have true wisdom at this critical moment, Rosenberg wrote on his website. Please pray for the Palestinian people who are feeling increasingly hopeless and left out of the process and seeing the U.S. and Israel make decisions without them. And pray, too, for the leaders and peoples of the moderate Arab states who are increasingly in favor of peace with Israel and see extraordinary opportunity for enhanced prosperity for all sides if treaties can be signed and trade relationships opened. Strange times in the Epicenter these days.

With both the United States and Israel facing a surge in coronavirus cases, annexation feels far less pressing than it did July 1, the first date that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could have formally proposed the move. A top Israeli official said this week that issue is landing on the back burner because the United States was paying it little attention.

Still, Evans said his followers, too, would be praying for annexation to move forward, aggrandizing the land under Israels control.

These people are terrified right now, that God is not happy with America, he said. Theyre looking at the riots, theyre looking at the plague of corona, and theyre worried, Is God unhappy, is he cursing us? Theyre not sure, and they want God to bless them.

The post A leading Evangelical says nixing West Bank annexation could cost Trump the election. Others disagree. appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Leading evangelical says no annexation could cost Trump election. Others disagree.

See more here:
Leading evangelical says no annexation could cost Trump election. Others disagree. - Forward

The Fight Over Hagia Sophia is About More Than a Building – The National Interest

Posted By on July 21, 2020

One of the architectural wonders of the world, the Hagia Sophia cathedral was conquered once before. It was converted into a mosque by its Ottoman conquerors; minarets were added, and its ancient Byzantine mosaics were whitewashed. More recently, it has functioned as a museum for decades. Now, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan has decreed that the historic Hagia Sophia church should be reverted into a mosque once again.

This aggressive move is about much more than a UNESCO World Heritage Site. It reveals Erdogans agenda to assert his vision for an expansionist Islamist Turkey, endangering Christians and other religious minorities in Turkey and throughout the Middle East.

Built as a cathedral by the Emperor Justinian I in 537, Hagia Sophia is still central to Orthodox Christianity. Upon the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottomans, it was converted to a mosque in 1453 as a sign of the Ottomans triumph and domination of the Christian population.

Centuries later in 1934, the secular founder of modern Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, turned Hagia Sophia into a museum open to all. It had remained a museum until now. The recent change back into a mosque has upset Christian leaders around the globe who remember the Ottoman Empires brutal treatment of Christians. Some from the Orthodox tradition find the move traumatic.

When courts affirmed the validity of Erdogans plan for the cathedral, he declared, Hagia Sophia became a mosque again, after eighty-six years, in the way Fatih the conqueror of Istanbul had wanted it to be. Erdogan has long fantasized about resurrecting a neo-Ottoman state. This swing back toward the time of Ottoman sultan Fatih SultanMehmet (known as Mehmed the Conqueror) rightly alarms Christian communities throughout the Middle East because they stand in the way of Erdogans vision of a new empire.

Turkeys expansionist bent is bad news for religious minorities and anyone else that does not fit Erdogans Islamist vision for the Middle East. When Turkey launched an incursion into Kurdish-led Northeast Syria last fall, a region known as an oasis of religious freedom and equality, it fired on civilians and forced hundreds of thousands of people to flee. In areas of Syria where Turkey remains in charge, women are forced to wear head coverings, and Yazidis have been forced to convert to Islam. Many religious minorities who fled are unlikely to return if Turkey remains in the area.

Yazidis and Christians were also targeted by Turkish military aggression in northern Iraq when Turkey led an air and ground attack against Sinjar in June. It was supposedly a campaign against the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), but PKK affiliates in Sinjar have never attacked Turkey. Those that paid the highest price were the civilians trying to rebuild their lives in this war-torn region. They are still feeling the effects of the Islamic States onslaught in 2014. And now, Christian villagers were forced to flee airstrikes. Everywhere Turkey moves in, religious minorities live in fear, and innocent civilians are attacked.

After what Erdogan called resurrecting Hagia Sophia, he promised to liberate al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. By planning to liberate the iconic mosque in Israels capital, Erdogan rallies his political base by fostering dreams of the subjugation of the Jewish state. He shows disregard for the governments of regional neighbors and that is likely to raise tensions if the Turkish government continues to make public statements like this.

Inside Turkey, non-Muslims do not fare much better. At least sixteen Christian workers have been expelled so far this year. Most training for Protestant leaders is conducted by foreign workers on long-term residence visas.

These restrictions on foreign nationals participating in ministry are a direct attack on Protestant churches growth and well-being in Turkey. It is worth remembering that it was not so long ago that the government imprisoned American pastor Andrew Brunson for two years on bogus charges ofaiding a coup attempt. The darkness of religious oppression is growing in Turkey, and that should concern us all.

When Hagia Sophia is formally reverted to a mosque later this month, it will be yet another manifestation of Erdogans vision for a conquering Islamist Turkey. Erdogan relishes the Ottoman empires history, which is a threat to religious minorities in Turkey and its surrounding countries. Ignoring Hagia Sophias legacy as a church and embracing its Islamist domination as a mosque is a dangerous sign pointing to Erdogans larger attempt to re-shape Turkey and the Middle East. Western countries should take note of the changes happening under Erdogans leadership. In his mind, the Islamization of the Hagia Sophia is just the beginning.

Arielle Del Turco is the Assistant Director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Family Research Council.

Image: Reuters

Go here to see the original:
The Fight Over Hagia Sophia is About More Than a Building - The National Interest

Wisconsin man pleads guilty to vandalizing synagogue as part of neo-Nazi group plot – Cleveland Jewish News

Posted By on July 21, 2020

A Wisconsin man has pleaded guilty to federal charges for vandalizing a synagogue in support of a neo-Nazi group plot to damage minority-owned property, including property used by Jewish citizens.

Yousef O. Barasneh, 23, was arrested in January.

He was charged with conspiring to violate citizens rights to use property free from threats and intimidation when he allegedly spray-painted swastikas and anti-Semitic words on the exterior of Beth Israel Sinai Congregation in Racine, Wisc., last September. He was also planning other acts of vandalism towards minority-owned property, according to the plea agreement.

It all occurred while he was part of a network known as The Base, which discussedthe recruitment of prospective members, the creation of a white ethno-state, acts of violence against minorities (including African-Americans and Jewish Americans) military training camps, and ways to make improvised explosive devices (IED), according to the plea agreement.

Six other people have been arrested for allegedly being part of The Base, according to court documents.

Barasneh faces up to 10 years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. A sentencing date has yet to be scheduled.

The post Wisconsin man pleads guilty to vandalizing synagogue as part of neo-Nazi group plot appeared first on JNS.org.

The rest is here:

Wisconsin man pleads guilty to vandalizing synagogue as part of neo-Nazi group plot - Cleveland Jewish News

The Pope who Printed the Talmud – Aish

Posted By on July 19, 2020

Pope Leo X allowed a remarkable group of men to produce the first printed set of Talmud.

A volume of the Talmud dedicated to the Pope? It seems unlikely but the very first printed edition of the Talmud was in fact dedicated to Pope Leo X, who reigned as pope from 1513 until his death in 1521.

For millennia, copies of the Talmud had been painstakingly written by hand. It could take many years to complete a set of all 63 masechtot, or tractates, of the Talmud.

In 1450, a German bookmaker named Johannes Gutenberg invented the very first printing press. He used it to print pamphlets and calendars, and several copies of the Bible. The Gutenberg Bible is considered the very first printed book ever produced in Europe. In the ensuing years, other printers copied Gutenbergs invention and began printing books. Several Jewish books were printed using the new mechanical invention but nobody ever attempted to print an entire copy of the Talmud. For years, sets of the Talmud continued to be written laboriously by hand.

That changed in 1519, after years of bitter debates, when the very first complete edition of the Talmud was produced using the new invention the mechanical printing press.

One of the very first printers to produce Hebrew books in Europe was Daniel Bomberg, a Christian printer who moved from his native Antwerp to Venice in 1515 and opened a printing press business there. Venice at the time was home to a vibrant Jewish community, and Bomberg realized that he could prosper by catering to this under-served market.

Printing Jewish books wasnt so easy. His initial requests for a license were repeatedly turned down by Church and city officials. Bomberg started offering local officials ever larger bribes to allow him to print Jewish books. After paying 500 ducats an enormous sum he was granted a ten-year license to print Hebrew books.

Bomberg got to work immediately, hiring learned Jews to help him. He petitioned Venices officials for permission to hire four well-instructed Jewish men. Jews living in Venice at the time could only live in the Ghetto and were forced to wear distinctive yellow caps whenever they left the Ghettos gates. Bombergs assistants were granted permission to wear black caps like other non-Jewish workers.

Together, they started printing copies of the Chumash, the Five Books of Moses, and other Jewish books. Bomberg and his Jewish assistants decided to include the text of Targum Onkelos, the translation of the Hebrew text written by the celebrated First Century Jewish scholar Onkelos, a popular custom still in practice today.

Bombergs pro-Jewish business activities were made somewhat easier by the climate in Europe overall, which was becoming more tolerant of Jews, thanks in part to an Austrian Jewish physician named Jacob Ben Jehiel (also known as Jacob Lender).

Very little is known about Jacob Ben Jehiels personal life. Whats clear is that he was a learned Jew, fluent in Hebrew, who worked as a doctor. He died in about 1505 in Linz, Austria. Unusual for a Jew, he rose to become one of the most influential men in the Holy Roman Empire, working as the personal assistant of Emperor Frederick III, who ruled from 1452-1493. It was noted that the two men were fast friends, and Jacob Ben Jehiels friendship influenced Frederick III to be sympathetic to his Jewish subjects. At the time the emperors enemies complained he was more a Jew than a Holy Roman Emperor. Jacob was so beloved by the Emperor that Frederick III knighted him, raising him from a lowly Jewish outcast to the ranks of the nobility.

One day, a young German nobleman named Johann von Reuchlin contacted Jacob, asking for his help in learning Hebrew. Hed studied with a Jew named Kalman in Paris, von Reuchln explained, and had learned the Hebrew alphabet. Now he wanted to learn more. Jacob Ben Jehiel agreed to tutor the Christian nobleman and taught him to read and write Hebrew. They struck up a friendship that would lead to von Reuchlin defending Jewish scholarship across Europe and to the first printing of the Talmud.

Now fluent in Hebrew, Reuchlin championed Jewish books, defending Jewish scholarship from Catholic zealots who wanted to ban Jewish literature and burn Jewish books. He had many Jewish friends and was remarkably tolerant of Jewish viewpoints and scholarship. When Catholic officials demanded that he and other scholars condemn the Talmud, von Reuchlin replied contemptuously that one not condemn what one had not personally read and understood. The Talmud was not composed for every blackguard to trample with unwashed feet and then to say that he knew all of it.

Johann von Reuchlin

In the early 1500s, von Reuchlin engaged in what was known as the Battle of the Books, arguing that Jewish scholarship had merit and that Hebrew books ought not to be banned.

Reuchlins main adversary in the Battle of the Books was Johannes Pfefferkorn, a Jew who converted to Christianity. He turned on his fellow Jews and caused years of pain and misery for Jewish communities across Germany.

Pfefferkorn was a butcher by trade but he was also in trouble with the law. He was arrested for burglary in his 30s, spent time in prison, and subsequently found himself unemployable. In order to reverse his ill fortune, he volunteered to convert to Christianity and to have his wife and children convert as well. Pfefferkorn embraced Catholicism under the protection of the Dominicans, the strict Catholic order that administered the feared Inquisition. The Dominicans wasted no time in using Pfefferkorn to help bolster their attempts to persecute Jews and to ban Jewish books.

In the years between 1507 and 1509, Pfefferkorn wrote a series of booklets claiming to illuminate the secret world of Jewish thought. Although Pfefferkorn's writings show that he had a very poor grasp of Jewish scholarship, that didnt deter him as he churned out booklet after booklet excoriating Jews and the Jewish faith. His pamphlets were written in Latin and aimed at Catholic scholars and priests. They had names such as Judenbeichte (Jewish Confession) and Judenfeind (Enemy of the Jews), and Pfefferkorn falsely claimed that Jews were devious and blasphemous and that their literature ought to be banned. Though he wasnt educated enough to study it himself, Pfefferkorn demanded that the Talmud be banned in Europe.

Using Pfefferkorns booklets as proof, Dominical authorities demanded that Jews be expelled from towns which had large Jewish communities, including Regensburg, Worms and Frankfurt. Their campaign succeeded in Regensburg and the citys Jews were expelled in 1519.

Pfefferkorn and his supporters managed to convince Emperor Maximilian I to briefly ban the Talmud and other Jewish books in cities across Germany and to destroy any and all Jewish books that could be found. This alarmed more liberal Catholics, including Johann Reuchlin, whod spent so long learning Hebrew and studying Jewish holy books with Jacob Ben Jehiel. Reuchlin objected and wrote passionate defenses of the Talmud and other Jewish books. Eventually, Maximilian I reversed his decree.

The Battle of the Books raged across German cities and was debated among the educated class: should the Jewish Talmud and other holy books be banned, or were they worthy of preservation and study? Historian Solomon Grayzel notes that There was not a liberal Christian in Europe, nor a single critic of the forces of bigotry within the Church, who failed to range himself on the side of Reuchlin in defense of the Jewish books Everyone who was not a peasant in Europe was thus ranged on one or the other side in the controversy. The only people who were forced to stand aside and not participate were the ones most directly concerned the Jews. (From A History of the Jews by Solomon Grayzel. Plume: 1968)

Reuchlin eventually gained a powerful ally: Pope Leo X. A cultured, educated man, Leo X came from the fabulously wealthy Medici family. He was disposed to be tolerant towards Jews so much so that at one point the Jews of Rome wondered if his benevolence towards them was a sign that the Messiah was on his way: community elders even wrote to Jewish leaders in the Land of Israel asking if they, too, had seen signs of the Messiah coming.

Pope Leo X

In 1518, Leo X took a public stand in the Battle of the Books: not only should the Talmud not be banned and burned, he stated, but he gave a Papal Decree allowing it to be printed using the new mechanical printing presses that were all the rage in Europe. Some individual volumes of the Talmud had already been printed; now, the Pope was allowing a complete set of all 63 volumes of the Talmud (called Shas in Hebrew) to be produced. Joannes Bomberg, whod already built up a Jewish business at his printing press in Venice, was given the commission to print this first complete set of Shas on his printing presses. It was an unprecedented show of support for Jews in Europe.

But Pope Leo X imposed one crucial condition: Daniel Bomberg could print the Talmud only if he included anti-Jewish polemics in the books. Realizing that this would alienate potential readers, Bomberg successfully lobbied against including anti-Jewish screeds in his Jewish books. He did, however, make one concession to the Popes generosity: the first four volumes of the set of Talmud he was printing were dedicated to Pope Leo X.

Bomberg Babylonian Talmud, Venice Pesachim

Local Jews were reluctant to buy expensive new volumes of the Talmud dedicated to a Catholic leader whose Church regularly persecuted Jews and Jewish communities across Europe, even if Pope Leo X himself was sympathetic towards Jews. Sales were sluggish and Bomberg realized he had to make some changes, including dropping the dedication to the Pope. He also turned to Jacob ben Chaim ibn Adonijah, a Jewish proofreader from Tunisia, for help. (There is some evidence that ibn Adonijah might have converted to Christianity, like some other printers who specialized in Hebrew books in Venice at the time.)

Bromberg and ibn Adonijah devised a layout of their printed editions of the Talmud that is still in use today. They placed the Talmud text in the middle of the page, and included key commentaries on the Talmud around the central text. The commentary by Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki (known as Rashi), a Medieval French scholar was printed on one side of the page. Commentaries by a group of other Medieval Jewish sages known as the Tosefotists are found on the opposite side of the page.

This layout made it easy to read and study, and proved an immediate hit with customers. Though their title pages no longer carried a printed dedication to Pope Leo X, these beautiful books continued to be printed with his permission, enabling even more Jewish communities to study and learn from complete sets of the printed Talmud.

For further reading, see these books:

Read the original:

The Pope who Printed the Talmud - Aish


Page 1,114«..1020..1,1131,1141,1151,116..1,1201,130..»

matomo tracker