Posted By  richards on March 7, 2015    
				
				    This series is a response to claims by various Jewish leftists        such as Antony Lerman thatwhile it used to be    okay to be a liberal Zionist, nowadays Israel politics is so    right-wing that being a liberal Zionist is a contradiction in    terms. While it was fine to be pro-Israel through the 1990s,    when the dream still lived, now they can only regretfully watch    from afar as Israel sinks into militarism, chauvinism, and    general illiberalism.  
    In     Part I of this series, I pointed out (a) that    theonly feasible alternatives to Zionism are    themselves illiberal, and (b) contrary to claims from various    leftists who have abandoned Israel,its entirely false    that Israeli politics have taken a sudden swing to the right,    and in fact the Israeli polity is significantly more liberal on    the issue of territorial compromise with the Palestinians than    it was, say, in the 1980s.  
    In     Part II of this series, I noted that claims of increasing    anti-Arab racism in Israel are false, and that in fact,    despite factors that would lead one to expect anti-Arab    sentiment in Israel to rise, it has in fact fallen slightly.  
    In     Part III of this series, I explained that just    before his assassination Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin,    representing the center-left Labor Party and hailed as a great    peacemaker, took public positions on negotiations with the    Palestinians that overall areto the    rightof the positions taken by the current    Netanyahu government.  
    For this installment, I commend to you     this article by Evelyn Gordon, who elaborates on all of the    points above and more. In particular, she also points to the    liberalization of the Israeli economy from its Socialist roots.    This might not seem to be something American liberals would    inherently appreciate, but back in the days of Labor    Party socialism when the government owned most of Israels    largest companies, ones employment prospects were tied to    ones connection with the political elite and the extent one    was in favor with the Histadrut labor federation, itself    an illiberal notion; worse yet, the political elite and labor    leadership was overwhelmingly composed of Jews of European    origin, leading to what amounted to state-sponsored    discrimination against Mizrahi (Eastern) Jews. More    generally, Gordon notes that discrimination against Mizrahim    has diminished significantly. (What she doesnt note, but I    will, is that Ashkenazi-Mizrahi marriages are so common today    that within a generation or two discussions of the social and    economic divide between the two groups will be anachronistic).  
    Moreover, not only are Israeli Arabs becoming more integrated    in Israeli society, especially with regard to higher education    and the burgeoning high-tech industry, but the progress has    been both dramatic and recent.  
    In short, concludes Gordon, Israeli politics [with    regard to the Palestinian issue] have shifted sharply to the    left; ideas once confined to the far-left fringe are now    mainstream. And civil rights, democracy, and treatment of    minorities have all been improving. So as Ive noted before,    if left-wing Jews are abandoning ties to Israel, its not    becauseIsrael has changed for the worse, but because they    have.  
      David Bernstein is the George Mason University Foundation      Professor at the George Mason University School of Law in      Arlington, VA. He is the author of Rehabilitating Lochner:      Defending Individual Rights Against Progressive Reform      (2011); You Can't Say That! The Growing Threat to Civil      Liberties from Antidiscrimination Laws (2003);    
Read the original:
Volokh Conspiracy: The phony end of liberal Zionism meme, part 4
				
Category: Ashkenazi |  
Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: The phony end of liberal Zionism meme, part 4                     
Tags: