How should we remember the Holocaust? – New Statesman
Posted By admin on January 22, 2021
As we approach Holocaust Memorial Day on 27 January the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz by the Red Army in 1945 we might spare a thought for the unsung David Morgan. He is the planning inspector whose task it is to make a recommendation to Robert Jenrick, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, on a proposal to create a national Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre located in the Victoria Tower Gardens, next to the Houses of Parliament. The proposal, originally made in 2015 by David Cameron, is supported by a range of eminent figures including other former prime ministers and more than 170 MPs and members of the House of Lords.
But in February 2020 Westminster City Councils planning committee rejected the application, saying it contravened planning rules on size, design and location. Objections to the proposal had come from a number of groups including Historic England, the International Council on Monuments and Sites, the London Gardens Trust, and the Royal Parks (to which Victoria Tower Gardens belong). Important archaeological remains would be obliterated by the excavations, it was said; there was a danger of flooding; trees would be destroyed; and the park, which forms part of a World Heritage Site, would be irreparably compromised.
The government now has taken the matter out of Westminster City Councils hands. Jenrick insisted that the government remains implacably committed to the construction of the Holocaust Memorial and education centre right at the heart of our democracy, beside our national parliament, to ensure that future generations never forget. A public enquiry into the decision opened on 6 October 2020 with Morgan in the chair. By the time it closed, on 13 November, 678 public comments had been received objecting to the memorial plan and 36 had been lodged in support. The volume of documentation publicly available online is immense. If Morgan completes his report, as promised, by the end of April, he will have mastered a truly Herculean task.
Why all the fuss? Surely no one could object to the idea of a national Holocaust memorial, particularly at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise across the world? Throwing his wholehearted support behind the proposal, Keir Starmer, no doubt worried about alienating the Jewish community, said: It is vital for our nation that we commemorate the six million Jewish men, woman and children murdered during the Holocaust. It is more important than ever that we educate current and future generations of the horrors of genocide and persecution. Who could possibly quarrel with this? Why then, is the proposal finding it so hard to secure approval?
Nobody, apart from anti-Semites, Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazis, could object to the idea of commemorating the Holocaust and its victims, and ensuring that future generations are made aware of historys greatest and most terrible crime. A string of witnesses appeared before the enquiry to present this justification for the idea of a national memorial. Yet despite all this, there are good reasons why objections to the proposal far outnumber endorsements.
The location of the proposed memorial in Victoria Tower Gardens is problematic, and not just because of the damage it will cause. The gardens are a much-loved oasis of quiet in one of the busiest parts of London. The proposal will remove over a quarter of one of Londons rare green spaces. The memorial itself will impede vistas onto the Houses of Parliament. It will dominate the other memorials on the site, including a fountain created by Charles Buxton in the mid-1860s to celebrate the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833]and moved to the gardens in 1957; RodinsThe Burghers of Calais, erected in 1911 to commemorate the civic virtue of six leading citizens of Calais who, in 1347, offered themselves to besiegers led by King Edward III, if he spared the rest of the citizens; and a memorial to Emmeline Pankhurst unveiled in 1930, with later additions, celebrating the victorious struggle for votes for women.
[see also:Defining genocide]
A group of 42 academics led by Dr Hannah Holtschneider, who teaches contemporary Jewish Studies at Edinburgh University, warned the enquiry that Victoria Gardens is a small space and the intended UK Holocaust Memorial would overpower all the existing statues and memorials there. They noted that in July 2005 the proposed Memorial 2007 by the Windrush Foundation for a smaller monument to commemorate the victims of slavery was denied by the Royal Parks on the basis that there was not enough space for any further memorials in Victoria Gardens. David Adjaye, the architect leading the Holocaust Memorials design team, has not endeared himself to opponents of the project by saying that disrupting the pleasure of being in a park is key to the thinking behind his proposal.
The memorial will consist of 23 bronze fins, with the gaps between the fins representing the 22 countries where the Holocaust destroyed Jewish communities. These aisles act as separate paths down to a hall named the Threshold leading into an underground learning centre, along with a contemplation court and hall of testimonies.
Why 22 countries? It depends on how you count them, but the figure is entirely arbitrary. From a historical point of view, it is important to count countries that existed in the 1940s separately because the processes and conditions of the Holocaust differed between them: thus it would make more sense to count as one country the Reich Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, and Slovakia as another where a puppet regime pursued its own anti-Semitic agendas. Similarly, the dynamics of the Holocaust differed between Serbia and Croatia, so it makes sense to treat them separately rather than subsume them into their previous existence as parts of the state of Yugoslavia. But we could also count countries as they exist today and not in the 1940s. Thus we could count separately deaths in present-day Belarus, Ukraine and Russia rather than merge them into the Soviet Union, though that would run the risk of implying that these modern-day states were in some way historically responsible for the Holocaust.
In any case it is inappropriate simply to count states whose Jewish communities were annihilated: a significant proportion of victims were foreign Jews, in most cases refugees, who were often the first to be handed over to the Nazis, as in Bulgaria, or Hungary, or France, precisely because they were foreigners.
Apart from these rather recondite problems there is also the more fundamental objection that the design itself is spectacularly ugly. Baroness Ruth Deech, one of the Jewish communitys leading objectors to the proposal, has compared it to a giant toast-rack. Lord Carlile, former independent reviewer of anti-terrorism laws, said that the site would be an obvious target for terrorist attacks. He reminded the enquiry that he had lost several relatives in the Holocaust. Having a site which combines the Houses of Parliament and the new British Holocaust memorial seems to me to be asking for trouble. Jenrick has reported that he and his family had received death threats from right-wing extremists because of his support for the memorial. Physical attacks on the memorial would be unavoidable. Others have suggested it would be a target for souvenir-hunters, and graffiti artists: the Buxton fountain was already vandalised and parts broken off some decades ago.
Would a memorial really help combat Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism? As Baroness Deech noted, anti-Semitism has been increasing in countries such as France and the US, and has not been prevented by the existence of Holocaust memorials and museums there. There are already a number of Holocaust memorials in Britain, including two in London. The UKs first Holocaust memorial, established in Hyde Park in 1983, is a garden of boulders surrounded by white-stemmed birch trees. There is also a statue in Liverpool Street Station commemorating the Jewish children saved from death by being brought to the UK from Nazi-dominated central Europe in theKindertransportscheme. These are fine monuments, but they have not prevented the rise in anti-Semitism in this country either.
Perhaps the proposed memorials underground learning centre would help. But this too is problematic. There already exist such institutions that are larger and better than anything the Westminster memorial could offer. Better than any learning centre is the Imperial War Museums Holocaust Exhibition, which attracts some 600,000 visitors in a normal year. It is linked to the museums significant archival collections, which make it an important location for research on the Second World War and theHolocaust.
The proposed memorial in Westminster would be an unnecessary duplication of the museums offerings. It would be on a smaller scale, and so less comprehensive and less effective, and would divert attention from the Imperial War Museums more important collections and displays. A significant expansion of the museums Holocaust Exhibition is under way and will soon be opened. In fact, the Imperial War Museum, located less than a mile away from the Palace of Westminster, is already the national Holocaust memorial centre and it remains the premier location for a comprehensive and scholarly coverage in the UK of this most tragic episode in human history.
There are other major research and learning institutions too, including the Beth Shalom Holocaust Centre in Nottinghamshire, the Holocaust Exhibition and Learning Centre in Huddersfield, and in London the Wiener Library for the study of the Holocaust and genocide. Compared to the vast collections of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum and the internationally important research centre associated with it, the Westminster memorial would only be an embarrassment for Britain if it laid claim to be the national institution of learning and research on the Holocaust.
The implication that a new memorial is needed because more research on the Holocaust is needed is also misleading. Britain, with its universities and its research institutions, is, along with Germany, the US and Israel, the worlds leading country for Holocaust research. Two excellent examples are the Holocaust Research Institute at Royal Holloway, University of London, and the research centred around the Parkes Library in Southampton. To suggest that recent and current Holocaust-related learning and research in the UK are inadequate or even non-existent does British scholarship and teaching in the field a grave disservice.
***
The designers of the Westminster project, if not all of its supporters, are aware that it cannot compete with these other research institutions, so they have proposed that it should focus not on the Holocaust itself, but on British reactions to the persecution and murder of European Jews. But this too is problematic. The location of the proposed memorial next to the Houses of Parliament has been justified on the grounds that it symbolises the importance of British values and parliamentary democracy as a bulwark against genocide. In 2016 David Cameron declared that the memorial was to stand beside parliament as a permanent statement of our values as a nation.
This amounts to the political instrumentalisation of the Holocaust. Baroness Deech has warned the enquiry that a Holocaust memorial might suggest that it was not our fault. In statements about the design and location of the learning centre, she has said, there has been increased emphasis on the promulgation of British values, and anti-extremism and faith as the foundation of those values, to the extent that the project now appears to be a monument to those values rather than remembering the Holocaust itself.
But these arent British values, they are universal values. The signatories of Holtschneiders letter, who include some of Britains leading historians of anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, and Britains responses to the Nazi persecution of the Jews such as Tony Kushner, Donald Bloxham, Tim Cole, David Feldman, Mark Levene, Louise London and Bob Moore have told the enquiry that placing the Holocaust Memorial next to parliament was likely to create a celebratory narrative of the British governments responses to the Jewish catastrophe during the Nazi era and beyond. Situating it so close to parliament is almost certain to add to the mythology of Britain alone as the ultimate saviour of the Jews, which negates several decades of careful scholarship and research.
Their concerns were supported by Raphael Wallfisch, a leading international concert cellist whose mother, Anita Lasker-Wallfisch, also a professional cellist, was forced by the SS as a teenager to play in the infamous womens orchestra at Auschwitz. The proposed British Values Learning Centre, to be symbolically positioned at the heart of Westminster, he told the enquiry, must reflect, clearly and truthfully, the complete and unvarnished truth of Britains role before, during and after the Jewish Holocaust If, as I hope sincerely, planning is refused for the learning centre at this site, it might allow for additional time for the search for a more generous space which would enable a thorough and dedicated study of the history and present state of anti-Semitism in the UK and worldwide.
[see also:Why Trump isnt a fascist]
That study, Professor Geoffrey Alderman, a leading Jewish academic and commentator on Jewish affairs, pointed out, must include difficult topics such as the restrictions on immigration to Palestine imposed by the British government in the 1930s and 1940s. With parliamentary approval, he declared pointedly, the least possible number of Jews was permitted to enter the UK. The proposal for a monument in Westminster, he added, had sparked widespread incredulity, embarrassment, and cynicism in the Anglo-Jewish community.
One could add that the British governments acceptance of theAnschlussof Austria and its brokering of the Munich Agreement in 1938 in the name of appeasing Hitler brought hundreds of thousands of Jews under Nazi rule, with terrible consequences for them all. Anti-Semitism was widespread in the higher ranks of the British civil service, a disturbing fact brought to public attention by the historian Martin GilbertsAuschwitz and the Allies(1981), which found that the civil service played a significant part in dissuading the Allies from taking action against the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp when it was well within the range of British bombers.
The UK Holocaust Memorial needs a fundamental rethink. Whether it is located at the Imperial War Museum (an excellent institution whose title is, however, long overdue for revision) or somewhere else, it has to find a more appropriate place. As for Victoria Square Gardens, there is room for one more memorial at least, perhaps next to the Buxton memorial commemorating the Abolition Act of 1833.
In 2008 Boris Johnson, as mayor of London, enthusiastically endorsed the idea of a permanent memorial to the millions who lost their lives in Britains transatlantic slave trade and sugar plantations in the West Indies in the 17th, 18th and early 19th centuries. That trade was maintained by numerous British companies, who fought hard to prevent abolition, as recounted in the historian Michael Taylors bookThe Interest: How the British Establishment Resisted the Abolition of Slavery(2020).
Unaccountably, however, the present UK government has been unable to find the funds to construct such a slavery memorial.
Richard J Evanss new book is The Hitler Conspiracies: The Third Reich and the Paranoid Imagination (Allen Lane).
Visit link:
How should we remember the Holocaust? - New Statesman
- 10 Roles That Made Us Really Love Rachel Weisz: From 'The Constant Gardener' to 'The Favourite' | Anglophenia - Anglophenia - March 5th, 2021
- Utah rabbi says Holocaust education resolution is 'justified and necessary' as denial increases - KSL.com - March 3rd, 2021
- Utah Rabbi says resolution emphasizing Holocaust education is 'justified and necessary' as denial increases - KSL.com - March 3rd, 2021
- This is a sign of how much trouble the GOP brand is in - KCTV Kansas City - February 26th, 2021
- Government urged to close loophole that allows extremists to radicalise others - Sky News - February 26th, 2021
- Reckoning with a Nazi Father - The New Yorker - February 16th, 2021
- In the Wake of Holocaust Remembrance Week, A Mitzvah - The Times of Israel - February 16th, 2021
- Opinion | On human rights, Amazon is at a crossroads - Crosscut - February 9th, 2021
- Taking Action to Repair Our World - IDN InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters - February 7th, 2021
- Opinion: QAnon, conspiracy theories are no joke - DW (English) - February 7th, 2021
- The Wall Street Journal Misreads Section 230 and the First Amendment - Lawfare - February 3rd, 2021
- 'Misha and the Wolves' is a stranger-than-fiction documentary about a woman's Holocaust story - USA TODAY - February 1st, 2021
- Facebook still has Holocaust denial content three months after Mark Zuckerberg pledged to remove it - USA TODAY - February 1st, 2021
- UN experts urge renewed commitment to combat antisemitism, including Holocaust distortion and denial - YubaNet - February 1st, 2021
- The Holocaust, history and today's politics - The CT Mirror - February 1st, 2021
- On this remembrance day, lessons of the Holocaust take on new urgency - Bangor Daily News - February 1st, 2021
- ADL social media Holocaust denial report card: C's and D's all around - The Jewish News of Northern California - February 1st, 2021
- Antisemitism and Holocaust denial on the rise in Australia, Josh Frydenberg warns - The Guardian - February 1st, 2021
- PaleyIMPACT: The Medias Role in Combating Holocaust Denial, Misinformation, and Antisemitism - Yahoo Entertainment - February 1st, 2021
- Abraham Accords the turning point for Arabic Holocaust education -opinion - The Jerusalem Post - February 1st, 2021
- Coronavirus conspiracy theories could be a fast-track to Holocaust denial - The Independent - February 1st, 2021
- The Conversation - Indonesia (via the Good Men Project) featured Dyson Professor Adam Klein's column "How To Fight Holocaust Denial in Social... - January 22nd, 2021
- AJC, FBI Meet to Discuss Efforts to Combat Antisemitism in the US - PRNewswire - January 22nd, 2021
- WJC and ADL Call on Tech Companies to Enforce Policies Banning Antisemitic and Hate Products - YubaNet - January 22nd, 2021
- 'The White Voice, Experience, and Interest Dominate Education' (Opinion) - Education Week - January 22nd, 2021
- One-man Holocaust play goes online to teach a new generation - The Jewish News of Northern California - January 22nd, 2021
- Why are people fighting the IHRA definition of antisemitism? - The Jerusalem Post - January 22nd, 2021
- Pure hate finds a home: How Parler became the social media platform for millions of Trump supporters - Milwaukee Independent - January 4th, 2021
- Activists call on Facebook and Twitter to ban Armenian genocide denial - Business Insider - Business Insider - January 1st, 2021
- My Turn: What will we bear witness to as truth as we head into 2021? - The Recorder - December 30th, 2020
- Lipstadt and Eisen sign on to roster of those who minimize the Holocaust - JNS.org - December 30th, 2020
- Book: Intent to deceive: Denying the Genocide of the Tutsi | ICN - Independent Catholic News - December 27th, 2020
- Takoma Park Mayor Releases Statement on Recent Incidents - Source of the Spring - December 27th, 2020
- Facebook overhauling hate speech algorithms to prioritize anti-Black, anti-LGBTQ comments over anti-white - WDHN - DothanFirst.com - December 12th, 2020
- Noam Chomsky and the Left: Allies or Strange Bedfellows? - The Wire - December 12th, 2020
- What the Facebook antitrust lawsuits might mean for hate speech - Forward - December 12th, 2020
- All I want for Hanukkah are these 8 human rights wishes - opinion - The Jerusalem Post - December 12th, 2020
- 'The Tehran Children: Iran's Unexpected & Suppressed Connection to the Holocaust' program set - timesobserver.com - December 5th, 2020
- Facebook's Updating its Approach to Hate Speech to Combat 'The Worst of the Worst' Cases - Social Media Today - December 5th, 2020
- Yes, Palestinians have the right to speak about antisemitism - Forward - December 5th, 2020
- How to fight Holocaust denial in social media with the evidence of what really happened - The Conversation US - December 4th, 2020
- Chautauqua Institution joins Holocaust Memorial Museum for 'The Tehran Children' - Olean Times Herald - December 4th, 2020
- Twitter, Facebook to update hate speech moderation | TheHill - The Hill - December 4th, 2020
- Publishers are not obliged to give bigots like Jordan Peterson a platform - The Guardian - December 4th, 2020
- Facebook said It would ban holocaust deniers. Instead, its algorithm provided a network for them - The Next Web - December 1st, 2020
- Facebook banned Holocaust denial but it's still easy to find - The Jewish News of Northern California - December 1st, 2020
- Facebook's ban has done little to rid the platform of Holocaust denial - Haaretz.com - December 1st, 2020
- Fury as Amazon Alexa spreading antisemitic conspiracies that Jews run the world and Holocaust denial - The Sun - December 1st, 2020
- Facebook announced It would prohibit holocaust deniers. Rather, its algorithm donated a network for them - Stanford Arts Review - December 1st, 2020
- Gen Z's Perception of the Holocaust | Eli Yissar Josefson | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - December 1st, 2020
- Palestinian rights and the IHRA definition of antisemitism - The Guardian - December 1st, 2020
- 'Facebook needs to improve': Social media giant to face scrutiny as backlash intensifies - Sydney Morning Herald - December 1st, 2020
- Forum: Europe needs proper distinction between freedom and rights - The Straits Times - December 1st, 2020
- Parler is bringing together mainstream conservatives, anti-Semites, and white supremacists as the social media platform attracts millions of Trump... - December 1st, 2020
- The Meaning of Hitler Review: A Look At Why the Icon of 20th-Century Hate Lives on in the 21st - Variety - December 1st, 2020
- Muslims v the west, in France and beyond - newagebd.net - December 1st, 2020
- Six weeks ago, Facebook announced a ban on Holocaust denial. It's still easy to find. - Cleveland Jewish News - November 25th, 2020
- Opinion: Nazi resistance fighters, Holocaust victims and the nonsense of COVID-19 denial - DW (English) - November 25th, 2020
- MPs demand Amazon explain why Alexa 'offers messages from antisemitic websites and conspiracy theories' - Sky News - November 25th, 2020
- In the first-ever expulsion, Lord Nazir Ahmed forced to quit from House of Lords - India New England - November 25th, 2020
- Yad Vashem is selling its soul to shady right-wing racists and populists - Haaretz.com - November 25th, 2020
- How David Adjaye Became the Worlds Most Beguiling Public Architectand Its Most Subversive - Robb Report - November 25th, 2020
- The Impact of Toxicity on Retention and LTV. - Gamasutra - November 25th, 2020
- Wiesenthal Center warns about Parler opening 'the door wide' to anti-Semitism - JNS.org - November 25th, 2020
- For 75th Anniversary of Nuremberg Trials, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Makes Available Full Sound Recordings of Trials and Film Used as... - November 21st, 2020
- EmTech Stage: Facebooks CTO on misinformation - MIT Technology Review - November 21st, 2020
- Wiesenthal Center warns about Parler opening the door wide to anti-Semitism - Cleveland Jewish News - November 21st, 2020
- A former right-wing media creator on how a different reality became so prominent. - The New York Times - November 21st, 2020
- Checking in with chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov - Jewish Insider - November 21st, 2020
- US elections and Jewish vote: Priorities of American Diaspora, implications for Israel - JNS.org - November 21st, 2020
- What I learned about teshuvah (and the internet) when I sat down with a repentant white supremacist - Heritage Florida Jewish News - November 21st, 2020
- Angered by Facebook and Twitter, conservatives jump to alternatives - AZFamily - November 21st, 2020
- Hungary Now Safest Place in Europe for Jews - Rabbi Kves at the Hungary at First 'Site' Conference - Hungary Today - November 21st, 2020
- The Latest: Romney slams Trump efforts to overturn election as 'undemocratic' - pressherald.com - November 21st, 2020
- Repressed grief is bad for the soul: Covid victims must be commemorated - Evening Standard - November 11th, 2020
- In its troubled hour, polling could use an irreverent figure to reset expectations - Huron Daily Tribune - November 11th, 2020
- Singh says government must move to counter hate groups, which have tripled since 2015 - Kamloops This Week - November 11th, 2020
- As the Trump era comes to an end, what happens to Big Tech? - The Bozeman Daily Chronicle - November 11th, 2020
- Revered Polish Jew, Holocaust survivor joins protests over top appointment at Yad Vashem - Haaretz.com - November 9th, 2020
- After The Defeat Of Donald Trump, Sacha Baron Cohen Turns His Attention To Mark Zuckerberg - Forbes - November 9th, 2020
Comments