Yes, Palestinians have the right to speak about antisemitism – Forward
Posted By admin on December 5, 2020
Earlier this week, a group of 122 prominent Palestinian and Arab scholars and intellectuals signed a petition about antisemitism. In it, they took on the question of whether anti-Zionism is inherently antisemitic, taking aim at the definition of antisemitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. Among other things, the IHRA working definition holds that denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination is antisemitic, a proposition which, the letter writers argue, leads to the suppression of Palestinian rights. The suppression of Palestinian rights in the IHRA definition betrays an attitude upholding Jewish privilege in Palestine instead of Jewish rights, and Jewish supremacy over Palestinians instead of Jewish safety, they argue.
No doubt, many in the Jewish community will dismiss a group of Palestinian intellectuals as unqualified to weigh in on antisemitism. After all, they are not its primary targets or victims, so what gives them the right to express their views on such a sensitive issue?
But Palestinians and their supporters are deeply implicated in the swirling controversy over antisemitism and anti-Zionism, for it is their criticism of Israel at which the formulators of new definitions of antisemitism take aim. The equation of opposition to Israel with antisemitism is actively and often opportunistically advanced by American politicians at national and state levels in order to target Palestinian activists, including President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has consistently focused on the BDS movement as undeniably antisemitic.
In this regard, Palestinians have standing to be heard on the subject of antisemitism.
The 122 petitioners begin by making clear that no expression of hatred for Jews as Jews should be tolerated anywhere in the world. Nor, they declare, can Holocaust denial, which has reared its head in the Palestinian world (including, infamously, in Mahmoud Abbas dissertation), be tolerated.
Where they depart from the discourse on antisemitism as formulated by the IHRA is on Zionism and Israel. The scholars argue against the identification of all Jews with the Zionist project. This is, as an empirical matter, true, especially if we focus on the population of Haredim who have traditionally been opposed to or agnostic about Zionism, though that is weakening over time.
Still, it is reasonable to assume that a majority of Jews in the world, including in the U.S., have a strong and positive identifications with Israel. And its a tactical mistake for Palestinians to deny this statistical reality, or to lapse into the business, as sometimes happens, of telling Jews what the real basis of their identity is (religious versus national). These moves play into the same game in which Jews tell Palestinians that they arent really a people but rather a scattered patchwork of tribes and clans. No good will come of this shared denialist project.
And yet, their critique of the IHRA definitions overreach cannot be ignored, especially with regard to the clause about denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination. The matter is far less straightforward than it seems, for there is no consensus in international law what the term self-determination means. It could mean nation-state sovereignty, but it also could mean other forms of political organization for example, a federation or national cultural autonomy that reflect a groups nationalcharacter.
In light of this, one could readily imagine a binational state in Israel/Palestine that recognized the national character of the Jews alongside a Palestinian nation as a fulfillment of the standard of self-determination. And yet, adherents to the IHRA definition would almost certainly deem it antisemitic.
What about the recurrent calls for the state of Israel to become a state of all its citizens, which is a different model of governance than a binational state. Is this antisemitic?
Here it is necessary to perform the same act of empathy that Jews demand of the nations of the world. What does the question look like through the eyes of Palestinians? They have been subjected to the major trauma of the Nakba and have had their self-determination consistently denied. Nearly five million Palestinians live in the West Bank and Gaza under some form of Israeli military control without political rights. Nearly two million Palestinians are formal citizens of Israel, but often feel disenfranchised in a state that repeatedly affirms, as did the 2018 Nation State Law, that it is built of, by, and for Jews.
Is it antisemitic to express the desire for full political enfranchisement by defining Israel as a state of all its citizens including Jews and Arabs alike? Or, as the Palestinian letter writers ask, is it forbidden to espouse support for all non-Zionist visions of the future of the Israeli state, such as the advocacy of a binational state or a secular democratic one that represents all its citizens equally?
I think here of a recent Palestinian-American student of mine. He possesses the same connection to his familys homeland that many American Jews toward Israel do except that hes never had an opportunity to visit Palestine. He is as open-minded and open-hearted as any student Ive met and has nary a shred of antisemitism in him.
Is it reasonable to deny him the right to advocate for a state that defines itself as democratic rather Jewish? Is his preference antisemitic? Should we also subject him to some form of formal or informal punishment because he believes that Israel is a racist endeavor?
This, according to the IHRA, merits designation as antisemitic. But what is my student to think when he calls to mind the occupation regime under which his relatives in the West Bank live the Wall, the constant electronic surveillance, the restrictions on movement, the separate roads and infrastructure, and the denial of equality? What is he to think when he compares his familys status to the 650,000 Israeli Jewish settlers in the West Bank?
The disparate condition of Jews and Palestinians in the West Bank, as prominent Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard has carefully documented, amounts to a regime of apartheid.
Under such conditions, it is understandable why one would use the language of racism with respect to the occupation of Palestinians in the West Bank. One could argue that not only is it not antisemitic to use such language, but that it is a Jewish obligation to do so.
On different grounds, the Palestinian letter writers make a strong point: To level the charge of antisemitism against anyone who regards the existing state of Israel as racist, notwithstanding the actual institutional and constitutional discrimination upon which it is based, amounts to granting Israel absolute impunity. Israel can thus deport its Palestinian citizens, or revoke their citizenship or deny them the right to vote, and still be immune from the accusation of racism.
This is not to deny that the accusation of racism is deeply wounding to Jewish ears. It is. But offense of this sort does not necessarily mean antisemitism. To stigmatize as antisemitic those who imagine Israel as a state of its citizens or who regard its policies as racist is effectively to deny them the right to advocate for justice for Palestinians.
And to equate these advocates to antisemites who plot and execute murderous attacks on Jews is a dangerous deflection, as well as an injustice both to the fight against antisemitism and to the struggle for justice for Palestinians.
David N. Myers teaches Jewish history at UCLA, where he directs the Luskin Center for History and Policy. He is the president of the board of the New Israel Fund.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.
More here:
Yes, Palestinians have the right to speak about antisemitism - Forward
- 10 Roles That Made Us Really Love Rachel Weisz: From 'The Constant Gardener' to 'The Favourite' | Anglophenia - Anglophenia - March 5th, 2021
- Utah rabbi says Holocaust education resolution is 'justified and necessary' as denial increases - KSL.com - March 3rd, 2021
- Utah Rabbi says resolution emphasizing Holocaust education is 'justified and necessary' as denial increases - KSL.com - March 3rd, 2021
- This is a sign of how much trouble the GOP brand is in - KCTV Kansas City - February 26th, 2021
- Government urged to close loophole that allows extremists to radicalise others - Sky News - February 26th, 2021
- Reckoning with a Nazi Father - The New Yorker - February 16th, 2021
- In the Wake of Holocaust Remembrance Week, A Mitzvah - The Times of Israel - February 16th, 2021
- Opinion | On human rights, Amazon is at a crossroads - Crosscut - February 9th, 2021
- Taking Action to Repair Our World - IDN InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters - February 7th, 2021
- Opinion: QAnon, conspiracy theories are no joke - DW (English) - February 7th, 2021
- The Wall Street Journal Misreads Section 230 and the First Amendment - Lawfare - February 3rd, 2021
- 'Misha and the Wolves' is a stranger-than-fiction documentary about a woman's Holocaust story - USA TODAY - February 1st, 2021
- Facebook still has Holocaust denial content three months after Mark Zuckerberg pledged to remove it - USA TODAY - February 1st, 2021
- UN experts urge renewed commitment to combat antisemitism, including Holocaust distortion and denial - YubaNet - February 1st, 2021
- The Holocaust, history and today's politics - The CT Mirror - February 1st, 2021
- On this remembrance day, lessons of the Holocaust take on new urgency - Bangor Daily News - February 1st, 2021
- ADL social media Holocaust denial report card: C's and D's all around - The Jewish News of Northern California - February 1st, 2021
- Antisemitism and Holocaust denial on the rise in Australia, Josh Frydenberg warns - The Guardian - February 1st, 2021
- PaleyIMPACT: The Medias Role in Combating Holocaust Denial, Misinformation, and Antisemitism - Yahoo Entertainment - February 1st, 2021
- Abraham Accords the turning point for Arabic Holocaust education -opinion - The Jerusalem Post - February 1st, 2021
- Coronavirus conspiracy theories could be a fast-track to Holocaust denial - The Independent - February 1st, 2021
- The Conversation - Indonesia (via the Good Men Project) featured Dyson Professor Adam Klein's column "How To Fight Holocaust Denial in Social... - January 22nd, 2021
- AJC, FBI Meet to Discuss Efforts to Combat Antisemitism in the US - PRNewswire - January 22nd, 2021
- WJC and ADL Call on Tech Companies to Enforce Policies Banning Antisemitic and Hate Products - YubaNet - January 22nd, 2021
- 'The White Voice, Experience, and Interest Dominate Education' (Opinion) - Education Week - January 22nd, 2021
- One-man Holocaust play goes online to teach a new generation - The Jewish News of Northern California - January 22nd, 2021
- How should we remember the Holocaust? - New Statesman - January 22nd, 2021
- Why are people fighting the IHRA definition of antisemitism? - The Jerusalem Post - January 22nd, 2021
- Pure hate finds a home: How Parler became the social media platform for millions of Trump supporters - Milwaukee Independent - January 4th, 2021
- Activists call on Facebook and Twitter to ban Armenian genocide denial - Business Insider - Business Insider - January 1st, 2021
- My Turn: What will we bear witness to as truth as we head into 2021? - The Recorder - December 30th, 2020
- Lipstadt and Eisen sign on to roster of those who minimize the Holocaust - JNS.org - December 30th, 2020
- Book: Intent to deceive: Denying the Genocide of the Tutsi | ICN - Independent Catholic News - December 27th, 2020
- Takoma Park Mayor Releases Statement on Recent Incidents - Source of the Spring - December 27th, 2020
- Facebook overhauling hate speech algorithms to prioritize anti-Black, anti-LGBTQ comments over anti-white - WDHN - DothanFirst.com - December 12th, 2020
- Noam Chomsky and the Left: Allies or Strange Bedfellows? - The Wire - December 12th, 2020
- What the Facebook antitrust lawsuits might mean for hate speech - Forward - December 12th, 2020
- All I want for Hanukkah are these 8 human rights wishes - opinion - The Jerusalem Post - December 12th, 2020
- 'The Tehran Children: Iran's Unexpected & Suppressed Connection to the Holocaust' program set - timesobserver.com - December 5th, 2020
- Facebook's Updating its Approach to Hate Speech to Combat 'The Worst of the Worst' Cases - Social Media Today - December 5th, 2020
- How to fight Holocaust denial in social media with the evidence of what really happened - The Conversation US - December 4th, 2020
- Chautauqua Institution joins Holocaust Memorial Museum for 'The Tehran Children' - Olean Times Herald - December 4th, 2020
- Twitter, Facebook to update hate speech moderation | TheHill - The Hill - December 4th, 2020
- Publishers are not obliged to give bigots like Jordan Peterson a platform - The Guardian - December 4th, 2020
- Facebook said It would ban holocaust deniers. Instead, its algorithm provided a network for them - The Next Web - December 1st, 2020
- Facebook banned Holocaust denial but it's still easy to find - The Jewish News of Northern California - December 1st, 2020
- Facebook's ban has done little to rid the platform of Holocaust denial - Haaretz.com - December 1st, 2020
- Fury as Amazon Alexa spreading antisemitic conspiracies that Jews run the world and Holocaust denial - The Sun - December 1st, 2020
- Facebook announced It would prohibit holocaust deniers. Rather, its algorithm donated a network for them - Stanford Arts Review - December 1st, 2020
- Gen Z's Perception of the Holocaust | Eli Yissar Josefson | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - December 1st, 2020
- Palestinian rights and the IHRA definition of antisemitism - The Guardian - December 1st, 2020
- 'Facebook needs to improve': Social media giant to face scrutiny as backlash intensifies - Sydney Morning Herald - December 1st, 2020
- Forum: Europe needs proper distinction between freedom and rights - The Straits Times - December 1st, 2020
- Parler is bringing together mainstream conservatives, anti-Semites, and white supremacists as the social media platform attracts millions of Trump... - December 1st, 2020
- The Meaning of Hitler Review: A Look At Why the Icon of 20th-Century Hate Lives on in the 21st - Variety - December 1st, 2020
- Muslims v the west, in France and beyond - newagebd.net - December 1st, 2020
- Six weeks ago, Facebook announced a ban on Holocaust denial. It's still easy to find. - Cleveland Jewish News - November 25th, 2020
- Opinion: Nazi resistance fighters, Holocaust victims and the nonsense of COVID-19 denial - DW (English) - November 25th, 2020
- MPs demand Amazon explain why Alexa 'offers messages from antisemitic websites and conspiracy theories' - Sky News - November 25th, 2020
- In the first-ever expulsion, Lord Nazir Ahmed forced to quit from House of Lords - India New England - November 25th, 2020
- Yad Vashem is selling its soul to shady right-wing racists and populists - Haaretz.com - November 25th, 2020
- How David Adjaye Became the Worlds Most Beguiling Public Architectand Its Most Subversive - Robb Report - November 25th, 2020
- The Impact of Toxicity on Retention and LTV. - Gamasutra - November 25th, 2020
- Wiesenthal Center warns about Parler opening 'the door wide' to anti-Semitism - JNS.org - November 25th, 2020
- For 75th Anniversary of Nuremberg Trials, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Makes Available Full Sound Recordings of Trials and Film Used as... - November 21st, 2020
- EmTech Stage: Facebooks CTO on misinformation - MIT Technology Review - November 21st, 2020
- Wiesenthal Center warns about Parler opening the door wide to anti-Semitism - Cleveland Jewish News - November 21st, 2020
- A former right-wing media creator on how a different reality became so prominent. - The New York Times - November 21st, 2020
- Checking in with chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov - Jewish Insider - November 21st, 2020
- US elections and Jewish vote: Priorities of American Diaspora, implications for Israel - JNS.org - November 21st, 2020
- What I learned about teshuvah (and the internet) when I sat down with a repentant white supremacist - Heritage Florida Jewish News - November 21st, 2020
- Angered by Facebook and Twitter, conservatives jump to alternatives - AZFamily - November 21st, 2020
- Hungary Now Safest Place in Europe for Jews - Rabbi Kves at the Hungary at First 'Site' Conference - Hungary Today - November 21st, 2020
- The Latest: Romney slams Trump efforts to overturn election as 'undemocratic' - pressherald.com - November 21st, 2020
- Repressed grief is bad for the soul: Covid victims must be commemorated - Evening Standard - November 11th, 2020
- In its troubled hour, polling could use an irreverent figure to reset expectations - Huron Daily Tribune - November 11th, 2020
- Singh says government must move to counter hate groups, which have tripled since 2015 - Kamloops This Week - November 11th, 2020
- As the Trump era comes to an end, what happens to Big Tech? - The Bozeman Daily Chronicle - November 11th, 2020
- Revered Polish Jew, Holocaust survivor joins protests over top appointment at Yad Vashem - Haaretz.com - November 9th, 2020
- After The Defeat Of Donald Trump, Sacha Baron Cohen Turns His Attention To Mark Zuckerberg - Forbes - November 9th, 2020
Comments