Page 1,559«..1020..1,5581,5591,5601,561..1,5701,580..»

As More Teams Host Gay Pride Events, Yankees Remain a Holdout – New York Times

Posted By on July 7, 2017

Those events have ranged from the infamous Disco Demolition Night once staged by the Chicago White Sox to the Mets Jewish and Irish heritage nights. The San Francisco Giants will host an African-American heritage night in September.

The Yankees have in recent years largely shied away from promotions with an ethnic or cultural flavor, although there are regular instances when they honor a cause with a brief pregame ceremony, such as last years Puerto Rican Day Parade.

And while the Yankees have chosen to refrain from holding a gay pride event at Yankee Stadium, a team spokesman, Jason Zillo, said there had been involvement behind the scenes.

Among the examples he cited: the work by General Manager Brian Cashman and the assistant general manager Jean Afterman with organizations that assist lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youths; a pregame ceremony last year to acknowledge those killed in a mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Fla.; and an invitation to Billy Bean, the gay Major League Baseball executive who promotes inclusion, to speak with Yankees players on the major and minor league levels.

Everyone of every nationality, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation and/or preference is welcome at Yankee Stadium every day, Zillo said in a statement. We are a long-term believer in diversity and inclusion, and have always looked to create a safe and supportive environment for all fans to enjoy their experience here.

Years ago, the doors of the old Yankee Stadium were opened for the closing ceremony of the 1994 Gay Games, and 40,000 people showed up. Nevertheless, in an era when Major League Baseball has taken steps to promote inclusiveness, most notably with the hiring of Bean in 2014, the Yankees have shown no inclination to hold a night for L.G.B.T. fans.

The Cubs are believed to be the first team to have had such an event, in 2001, and by the end of this season, only three teams besides the Yankees the Los Angeles Angels, the Cincinnati Reds and the Milwaukee Brewers will apparently not have had one, according to the website Outsports.com and news reports.

(In addition to the Yankees, the Angels confirmed that they had not had a pride event. The Brewers and the Reds did not respond to requests for comment.)

If big-market teams like the Dodgers, Cubs and Nationals can do it, it begs the question: Why arent the Yankees doing it? said Bill Gubrud, who helped organize the initial event at Wrigley Field.

The Yankees, not unlike their uniforms, which look essentially the same on Aaron Judge as they did on Joe DiMaggio, are often not quick to change. They have been steadfast in their decades-old grooming policy, which keeps players from having long hair or beards. And while the Mets and other teams have extended netting down the foul lines this season in an effort to further protect fans from foul balls and shattered bats, the Yankees have not taken that step.

Most pride days, or nights, are not generated by a major league team itself, but by an outside organization. Gubrud was selling ads for a gay newspaper in Chicago when he called the Cubs years ago about buying an ad. When they agreed, he asked how many tickets would have to be sold to have a gay-themed event at Wrigley Field.

He was told 2,000.

Ill take them all, Gubrud said.

The Philadelphia Phillies began hosting their pride night soon after, when Larry Felzer, a lawyer, organized what would become an annual event. The Phillies took it over last year, but the events infrastructure had been established by Felzer. The Dodgers pride night, begun four years ago, has become so popular that promoters are bidding to host it.

David Kilmnick, the chief executive of the L.G.B.T. Network, was the person who spurred the Mets to resume their pride night last season (the team had one more than a decade earlier), and he also approached the Yankees. He met with Yankees representatives at a diversity meeting sponsored by Major League Baseball during spring training in 2016 and pitched them for 15 minutes on the idea of a pride event as well as workplace-sensitivity training.

It was the last he heard from the team, he said. I havent received any interest, he added.

Though Bean has worked closely with the Yankees in other areas of inclusiveness, the team has not spoken with him about a pride event.

If the Yankees approached me, Id be front and center in getting it done or putting it out there, Bean said. This is a process. I dont want teams to feel like theyre pressured. It has to be organic.

Bean, who spoke at the Yankees major league and minor league camps in spring training, said that the team had been supportive and that the conversation about pride events was relatively new.

The idea of a team not hosting a pride night is not a complete assessment of its stance on inclusion, especially where baseballs responsibility lies, he said.

Still, Bean cited the importance of having such events, especially in a place like New York. Too many L.G.B.T. baseball fans, he said, have memories of being ostracized in Little League or hearing disparaging comments while sitting in the stands at a major league game.

When teams host pride events, Bean said: Its part of us getting better and understanding the value of being inclusive. Theres a massive significance to that message.

To some, like Kilmnick, pride nights are an opportunity to further a conversation and to extend engagement with teams beyond a night at the ballpark. He noted that there had still not been an openly gay major leaguer. (David Denson, a low-level minor league player for the Milwaukee Brewers, came out as gay two years ago; he has since retired.)

Pride night was more than about ticket sales and its more than just another theme night or promotion night, Kilmnick said. It was about having a place at the ballpark for the L.G.B.T. community to come down and feel safe, and believe especially for the younger people that they could be a major leaguer and not hide.

Kilmnick said his organization, which does antibullying work with Long Island and New York City schools, had plans to do a pride night with the New York Cosmos of the North American Soccer League in September.

He was surprised to learn that the Yankees had never had such an event, but then the lifelong Mets fan in him emerged.

The Mets have been the underdog and the Yankees have been the elite, he said. In that way it doesnt surprise me. Youd think the Mets would come out for those underdogs in society, but I think its time the Yankees stand up and do something for the L.G.B.T. fans and the Bronx.

Read the original here:
As More Teams Host Gay Pride Events, Yankees Remain a Holdout - New York Times

Jay-Z lyric plays into Jewish stereotypes, Anti-Defamation League says – Washington Post

Posted By on July 7, 2017

Jay-Zs newest album 4:44 may be a critical and commercial smash, but not everyone is pleased with it.

The Anti-Defamation League criticized the rapper for a couple of lyrics it considered anti-Semitic soon after its release last Friday.

In the song The Story of O.J., he rapped, You wanna know whats more important than throwin away money at a strip club? Credit/ You ever wonder why Jewish people own all the property in America? This how they did it.

A spokesperson from the ADL told Rolling Stone that whilethe organization doesnt believe Jay-Z meant to promoteanti-Semitism, the lyric isconcerning.

The lyric does seem to play into deep-seated anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jews and money. The idea that Jews own all the property in this country and have used credit to financially get ahead are odious and false. Yet, such notions have lingered in society for decades, and we are concerned that this lyric could feed into preconceived notions about Jews and alleged Jewish control of the banks and finance.

The statement comes after some fans reacted negatively to the lyrics on social media, as the album shotto platinum status.

Jay-Zexplains that the antisemitic theory of Jewish owning all the property in America is the result of smart business practices, tweetedone user.

Though the rapper himself hasnt commented on the controversy, several notable members of themusic community rushed to Jay-Zs defense.

Guy Oseary, the Jerusalem-born manager to acts like Madonna and U2, posted a photo of himself with Jay-Z to Instagram.

If you read the lyrics out of context I can understand why people are jumping to that conclusion, he wrote in the posts caption. But if you listen to the song in its entirety you will hear that the whole of the song is based on exaggerated stereotypes to make a point.

In fact, Oseary said, the rapper was trying toshowcase a community of people that are thought to have made wise business decisions. As an example of what is possible and achievable.

In my opinion, Jay is giving the Jewish community a compliment, he concluded.

In a series of tweets, meanwhile, hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons said, First, let me state that mischief makers would like to take Jays statements about theculture and practices that exist within some parts of the Jewish community (notice I say some). The fact is this culture that promotesgood business and financial well being is and has been a guiding light to the black and specifically the hip-hop community.

Jay-Zs lyrics being met with simultaneous praise and criticism is par for the course at this point.

Since his 1996 debut record Reasonable Doubt, theres been a strange dichotomy to his work. On one hand, hes long been praised for being one of the earliest (and loudest) voices in a liberating genre, one that gave black artists a mainstream voice in music. On the other hand, critics say, his lyrics have often been tinged with misogyny, homophobia and now anti-Semitism.

Given that Jay-Z has released albums now for more than two decades, the examples are plentiful.

In his early work, for example, Jay-Z used the word faggot with some regularity, always seemingly meant as an insult. [An example from Heart of the City (Aint No Love): Faggots hate when you gettin money like athletes.] Years later, though, he came out in support of gay marriage. On his newest record, in fact, his mother Gloria Carter came out as a lesbian.

By Jay-Zs own accounts, his life experiences have informed some of his lyrical changes. After he and wife Beyonc had their daughter Blue Ivy Carter in 2012, the rapper said he would no longer use the word bitch in his songs. By that point, though, he had used the word in 109 out of his 217 songs, according to Time, which added, Thats 50.2% of Jay-Zs entire lyrical output.

Jay-Zs involvement with politics, though, arguably sparked the most criticism of his former lyrics. The rapper publicly supported both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, endorsements which launched a thousand opinion pieces focusing on his past lyrics.

[Obama describes his bond with Jay-Z]

President Barack Obama celebrates Jay-Z and elicits his support, yet it is difficult to believe POTUS the parent would ever want his adolescent daughters exposed to Jay-Zs serial characterization of women as bitches and hos,' wrotecolumnist Norman Chad in 2013.

Jay Z repeatedly drops n-word, f-bomb during concert for Hillary Clinton, read a 2016 Business Insider headline.

[For artists of color, President Obama leaves a musical legacy, too]

Even Donald Trump, as a presidential candidate, brought up Jay-Zs lyrics.

I actually like Jay-Z, but you know the language last night, Trumpsaid during a 2016 campaign event. I was just thinking maybe I should just try it, should I use that language for one event? Can you imagine if I said that? So he used every word in the book. I wont even use the initials, because Ill get in trouble, theyll get me in trouble. He used every word in the book last night.

On the other hand, though, Obama quoted Jay-Z in a speech on the 50th anniversary of Alabama state troopers attacking nonviolent, mostly blackprotesters marching from Selma to Montgomery. Recently, in fact, the former president helped induct Jay-Z into the Songwriters Hall of Fame, calling hima true American original.

More from Morning Mix

Delta says passenger attacked flight attendant, forcing flight to turn back

Did Lena Dunham invent story of her abused dog Lamby? Animal shelter says yes.

Fox Business host Charles Payne suspended amid sexual harassment claims

Instagram bug deletes and disables accounts, angers users

See the rest here:
Jay-Z lyric plays into Jewish stereotypes, Anti-Defamation League says - Washington Post

Anti-Defamation League Criticizes JAY-Z for The Story of OJ Jewish Lyric – Pitchfork

Posted By on July 7, 2017

Since releasing his new album 4:44 last week, JAY-Z has come under fire for anti-Semitism perceived in a line from his song The Story of O.J. He raps on the track, You wanna know whats more important than throwin away money at a strip club? Credit/ You ever wonder why Jewish people own all the property in America? This how they did it. Now, the Anti-Defamation League has publicly criticized JAY-Z for the lyric. An ADL representative told Rolling Stone that while JAY-Z had spoken out against anti-Semitism and racism in the past, the line still fed into stereotypes. Such notions have lingered in society for decades, and we are concerned that this lyric could feed into preconceived notions about Jews and alleged Jewish control of the banks and finance, they stated.

In the days since criticism over the lyric has circulated, U2 and Madonnas manager Guy Oseary posted a lengthy defense on Instagram. Russell Simmons also spoke up on his behalf. Besides releasing an animated short for that particular song, JAY-Z invited Kendrick Lamar, Will Smith, and others to discuss racism in an accompanying clip titled Episode One: Footnotes for The Story of O.J. Pitchfork has reached out to JAY-Zs representatives for comment.

Read more:
Anti-Defamation League Criticizes JAY-Z for The Story of OJ Jewish Lyric - Pitchfork

Anti-Defamation League Speaks Out Ahead of Planned Rally – NBC 29 News

Posted By on July 7, 2017

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (WVIR) -

The Anti-Defamation League is speaking out ahead of Saturdays planned Ku Klux Klan rally.

The group says it has been tracking groups like the KKK for several years.

The league says there are more than 40 groups in 33 states. Half have formed in the last three years with fewer than 100 members in each group.

The league is also taking note of the increase in each group's visibility.

The political atmosphere has emboldened haters to come out and express themselves. Weve seen this on the right. Weve also seen it to some extent on the extreme left. But there is definitely a heightened divisiveness and an emboldening of folks to speak in hateful ways, said Doron Ezickson, of the Anti-Defamation League

The Anti-Defamation League says the groups main effort is to disseminate hate literature in the form of flyers but also take to social media.

See the article here:
Anti-Defamation League Speaks Out Ahead of Planned Rally - NBC 29 News

Anti-Defamation League Defends Jay-Z Sort Of – Forward

Posted By on July 7, 2017

Everybody who is anybody (or, at the very least, Amy Schumers manager) is talking about whether or not Jay Zs new album dabbles in anti-semitism with the lyrics You wanna know whats more important than throwin away money at a strip club? Credit/ You ever wonder why Jewish people own all the property in America? This how they did it.

And now, the Anti-Defamation League is joining the debate.

The organization told Rolling Stone, We do not believe it was Jay-Zs intent to promote anti-semitism. On the contrary, we know that Jay-Z is someone who has used his celebrity in the past to speak out responsibly and forcefully against the evils of racism and anti-semitism.

But the ADL did express concern that the lyrics could feed into preconceived notions about Jews and alleged Jewish control of the banks and finance.

Good intentions, poor execution. Seems like a fair assessment.

Becky Scott is the editor of The Schmooze. Follow her on Twitter at @arr_scott

See more here:
Anti-Defamation League Defends Jay-Z Sort Of - Forward

Media allows bogus civil rights group ADL to smear Israel critics and Black Lives Matter activists – Salon

Posted By on July 7, 2017

This article originally appeared on AlterNet.

In the wake of the Virginia congressional baseball practice shooting by James T. Hodgkinson, a former Sanders volunteer who targeted Republican Congressman Steve Scalise in early June, trend piece-giddy journalists rushed to publish horseshoe theory takes on the rise of the extreme left and how it too poses a threat to the fabric of society. In many of these articles, civil rights organization Anti-Defamation League was there to reinforce this false balance and populate its articles with warnings of emerging left-wing violence.

Take, for starters, this recent scare piece in Vice:

I think were in a time when we cant ignore the extremism from the Left, said Oren Segal, the director of the Center on Extremism, an arm of the Anti-Defamation League. Over the past few months, the ADL, which hosts regular seminars on homegrown extremism for law enforcement officials, has begun warning of the rising threat posed by far-left groups, most recently at a seminar just this past Sunday. When we have anti-fascist counterprotests not that they are the same as white supremacists that can ratchet up the violence at these events, and it means we can see people who are violent on their own be attracted to that, Segal said. I hate to say it, but it feels inevitable.

This posturing was undermined by the followup sentence in the next paragraph: The evidence is so far largely anecdotal.

Anecdotal, as in not proven to exist in any meaningful sense. The ADL, to maintain its just calling balls and strikes image must denounce extremism on both sides and though it sometimes notes right and left violence are not equal, it is happy to help frame the problem as such.

Warning of the potential for another Greensboro Massacre a 1979 street battle in North Carolina between communists and the KKK that left five leftists dead ADLs Mark Pitcavage told Politico, My big concern is sooner or later is that were going to have another Greensboro Massacre type of event.

The Vice article went on to call the Black Panthers a left-wing extremist group. Its unclear if the rampant institutional racism, police brutality, and the ongoing skilling of hundreds of thousands of Indochinese by the U.S. government the Black Panthers fought to undermine is also considered extremist in their calculation, but the parameters of acceptable violence have been laid out, no matter how arbitrary.

Nowhere in any of these reports, and nowhere in the ADLs official statement, was Hodgkinsons history of domestic violence noted, a trait thats afar bigger predictor of mass shootings than liberal ideology. Also left unmentioned was that in addition to being a Sanders fan, Hodgkinson wasobsessedwith the Trump-Russia collusion theory, a narrative that spans the center-left to the neocon right. Hodgkinson had to be jammed into a vague far left label and any evidence that ran counter to this narrative was ignored by both the ADL and the reports its quotes help populate.

Smearing Black Lives Matter activists

Another tendency of the ADL is to smear Black Lives Matter activists who couple their struggle with those of the Palestinians.

In an op-edlast weekin Time magazine titled Anti-Semitism Is Creeping Into Progressivism, ADL president Jonathan Greenblatt went out of his way to smear the Movement For Black Lives, a confederation of grassroots Black Lives Matter organizations, as anti-Semitic:

Last summer, a plank in the platform of the Movement for Black Lives bizarrely accused Israel of genocide. . .We were outraged by the baseless accusations made against Israel in the M4BL platform released last summer.

Nowhere in his drive-by potshot does Greenblatt specify what he found objectionable, other than vaguely alluding to the Movement for Black Lives claim that Israel was committing genocide against the Palestinian people.

No rebuke is necessary, no understanding of the broader context of their grievance. M4BL had a 32,000-word manifesto and put Israels violence against the Palestinians in the broader context of U.S. military aggression against black and brown people throughout the globe, a common anti-imperialist critique leveled by everyone from Noam Chomsky to Malcolm X. Whether or not the charge of genocide is appropriate is debatable, but theres no evidence it was coming from a place of hatred against Jews.

But so it goes with the ADL which, by its own admission, makes little distinction between criticizing Israel and libeling Jewish people. It allows for legitimate criticism of Israel around the margins, but never clearly defines what this is or how polite nudging among liberals will ever compel right-wing forces within Israel to cease settlement activity or recognize Palestinians right to self-determination.

Anti-BDS lobbying

The ADL has a history of doubling as a pro-Israel public relations firm. Earlier this year, the ADL co-authored a report with hard line Israeli think tank Reut Institute highlighting how to combat the growing Palestinian solidarity movement and establish what they called a pro-Israel network to defend the legitimacy of Israel as Jewish state.

Does this sound like the activities of a civil rights organization or a lobby acting on behalf of a nation-state? To the ADL, its both it makes little distinction between Zionism and Judaism and thus little distinction between meaningful criticism of Israel and irrational hatred of Jews. Nonetheless, its ideological aims are clear. While ADL does do important workhighlighting and documentingright-wing extremism, its broader aim is running spin for Israel. A search of the ADL website makes this clear. Israel returns 29,300 results, whereas white supremacist returns 6,560, KKK 777, African American 2,490, and islamophobia a paltry 361.

ADL president Greenblatt spends a considerable amount of time attacking the boycott, divestment, sanctions (BDS) movement designed to isolate Israel over its 50-year military occupation of the West Bank. So lets see BDS for what it is, he wrote last year, a continuation, a modern version if you will, of an irrational hatred of the Jewish people.

Greenblatts smear continues:

Linda Sarsour, a leader of the womens rights movement, has lambasted Zionismas incompatible with feminism and advocates for the exclusion of pro-Israel Jews from activist groups. And some in the anti-Israel movement have accused Israel of pink-washing, claiming that Israel and its supporters celebrate freedoms enjoyed by the LGBTQ community in Israel to divert attention from Israels treatment of the Palestinians.

For an organization like the Anti-Defamation League, which was founded both to combat anti-Semitism and protect the Jewish people but also to secure justice and fair treatment to all Americans, these manifestations are upsetting.

Nowhere does not Greenblatt specify what Sarsour or critics of pink washing said that was anti-Semitic. He just asserts they are and and moves on. The reason he doesnt, of course, is that to drill down on their arguments one would see Sarsours criticism of Zionism isnt rooted in hate, but rather an objection to a specific ideology and the policies of a specific country. Instead Greenblatt is given free rein to pin on her and other activists the most vile of labels without consequence.

The BDS movement rose out of necessity. With an automatic U.S. veto at the U.N. on behalf of Israel, a corrupt Israeli-sanctioned Palestinian leadership with little legitimacy and 50 years of humiliating military occupation, Palestinians had no other recourse. Despite vague, decades-long appeals to a bilateral peace process which the ADL always insists they try Jewish settlements in Palestine grow geometrically, rendering a contiguous Palestinian state a physical impossibility. Greenblatt puts the bulk of the blame on Palestinians he says have practiced rejectionism, whatever that means. Meanwhile, the occupation goes on and the lack of progress is always blamed on some broad moral failing within Palestinian society manifested as mindless anti-Semitism.

Denounce terrorism and practice nonviolence, Palestinians are told. After doing just this via BDS they are then told that this, itseslf, is racist hate speech. Palestinians cant win and the ADL is on the ideological vanguard setting out to make sure they never can. How, one is compelled to ask, does this serve the cause of civil rights?

Follow this link:
Media allows bogus civil rights group ADL to smear Israel critics and Black Lives Matter activists - Salon

‘Zionism and Maccabiah come from the same spirit’ – Arutz Sheva

Posted By on July 6, 2017

Fireworks at the opening ceremony of the 20th Maccabiah Games in Jerusalem

Yonatan Sindel/Flash 90

President Reuven Rivlin on Thursday evening officially opened the 20th Maccabiah Games, being held this year with the theme of celebrating 50 years of a united Jerusalem.

Also speaking at the opening ceremony was Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. The event was attended by around 30,000 athletes and their supporters, and saw a procession of 80 national teams from all the countries represented at the Games.

Welcome to Jerusalem, welcome to Israel. Welcome home. How great it is to see you all here in Jerusalem the rebuilt and free, eternal capital of Israel for the opening of the 20th Maccabiah Games, Rivlin began his remarks.

This is the biggest ever Maccabiah since the Games began 85 years ago. Then, in the year 1932, the skies over Europe had already began to darken. And today, today we stand here, marking the 20th Maccabiah Games themed around the 50th anniversary of liberation of Jerusalem, he noted,

The President quoted Yosef Yekutieli, one of the leaders and initiators of the Maccabiah Games who said the aim of the Games was to elevate not just physically, but also spiritually.

The sporting spirit as we feel it, pushes us to break down the barriers of the body and soul. It pushes us to break through existing barriers. To create a new reality. To assess the boundaries, and to each time reach higher, be faster, stronger. This is the same spirit from which came Zionism. This is the same spirit from which came the Maccabiah. This is the spirit we expect from you also today, here at these Games, in the competitions, on the sports fields, in the swimming pools. I know the innovative and brave sporting spirit, which spreads its wings and reaches for the sky. In just a few short moments, the adrenaline and the elation will burst forth, and will fill the tracks and fields of Jerusalem, in Haifa, and across the country, from north to south. Together, we will all join in the true festival of sport, a festival of mind and body.

Rivlin went on to speak of the memory of the athletes who were killed in the tragedy at the 15 Maccabiah Games, and of the Israeli athletes who were murdered by terrorists at the Munich Olympics some of whom he noted, were Maccabiah champions.

Our hearts are with their families, he said.

The President concluded by declaring the Games open, and wished all the sportsmen and women, the many spectators in the stadiums and at home uplifting days, days of fun, enjoyment and tension, record-breaking moments; personal records, national, and international records. My dear athletes, our land is your land, our home is your home.

Congratulations to all of us, on the opening of the 20th Maccabiah Games, here in Jerusalem!

Read more:
'Zionism and Maccabiah come from the same spirit' - Arutz Sheva

The Fantasy Writer, Der Nister, and His Ambivalence Towards Zionism – Forward

Posted By on July 6, 2017

This article originally appeared in the Yiddish Forverts.

Der Nister, a master of fantasy tales who later turned to Soviet-style realism in his writing, was a complicated man and rarely opened himself up to strangers. There were books of memoirs written about him but they deal, for the most part, with his earlier years. The 1930s, during which Der Nister experienced a crisis of creativity and took on his new literary style, remain the most mysterious years of his life. After bitter attacks by Soviet party-line critics in 1929, he became extremely cautious with his ideas, even among friends.

Yuri Smolich, the Ukrainian writer whose memoirs reveal fascinating aspects of Der Nisters personality and ideology

Luckily, we have one source of memoirs which sheds some fascinating light on Der Nisters personality. Written by the Ukrainian writer Yuri Smolich, this book is now part of a collection of Der Nisters papers in the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art in Moscow.

Smolich was a distinguished literary official in Soviet Ukraine, and his printed memoirs contain a lot of valuable cultural and historical details about that era. (His chapter about Der Nister was, predictably, not included in the official Soviet edition.) Smolich was Der Nisters neighbor in Kharkiv in the 1930s, and they became good friends after the Soviet Ukraines capital was moved from Kharkiv to Kiev in 1934. Both writers remained in Kharkiv and felt unproductive.

Smolich recalls their first encounter: Der Nister was sitting on a bench in the courtyard of the writers club and was enjoying the first warm rays of the May sun. Further down, some people were playing volleyball. On the side, a small group of writers were standing and smoking, likely taking a break from some meeting or discussion at the club. Apparently, they were also talking about the sacrosanct issue of Zionism.

As a Ukrainian, Smolich was not well versed in Jewish ideological issues and asked Der Nister for his opinion on Zionism. Der Nister replied angrily: Thats all evil gossip. There is no Zionism in any of my work. Its foolishness, I hate it, do you understand? Smolich was shocked at Der Nisters heated reaction.

But after the meeting concluded, Der Nister ran after Smolich and apologized: Forgive me, Comrade Smolich, I thought you were one of them! He was referring to the proletarian critics who had berated him for his Zionism. The two writers chatted for a while, and Der Nister explained at length why he truly didnt like Zionism: Why does an impoverished Jewish man need a state controlled by the Brodskys and the Rothschilds, ruled by Hasidic rabbis? Even if ten million Jews were to actually reach Palestine would a small state ever become independent in our lifetime? Or will it be stolen by the rich men and politicians of leading capitalist countries?

Yet, Der Nister was just as skeptical of the Soviet projects for Jewish agricultural colonization and didnt even believe in a future for Jews in the Jewish autonomous region, Birobidzhan. He explained his doubts to Smolich, asking ironically: What would you say if a Ukrainian state were proposed to be created in Australia?

Even during the 1930s, Der Nister remained as firm a believer in the Jewish Diaspora as he was before the revolution. He hoped that the Soviet power would continue to support Jewish cultural and social institutions founded in the Soviet Union a decade before.

At the same time, Der Nister set out to master realism in his writing. He penned a series of works in a style that was directly opposed to his previous fantasy tales. Smolich believes that the reason for this was not to acquiesce to new Soviet ideological demands, but rather to learn how to portray realism as a literary tool.

Smolich met Der Nister again in 1943, when the latter was just returning from the evacuation of Jews to Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Der Nister was sitting in a far corner in the Moscow State Jewish Theatre, which was his home at the time. Smolich writes: Der Nister looked very depressed. Smolich, he said to me, Tell me that Im sleeping. Say that this is just a bad dream, and wake me up, wake me up! People cant be so evil!

As evidenced from research recently published by Dr. Dov-Ber Kotlerman, of Bar Ilan University in Israel, Der Nister changed his opinion of Birobidzhan after the war. He visited the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in 1947 and was delighted by the enthusiasm of the new settlers from the Ukraine. It isnt clear whether he ever revised his attitude to Zionism after the establishment of the State of Israel. Among his very last works was a eulogy for Solomon Mikhoels, artistic director of the Moscow State Jewish Theater, who was murdered by Stalin in January 1948.

Der Nister himself was arrested a year later and died in a prison camp in 1950.

(Translation by Mallika Viswanath)

__

Read more:
The Fantasy Writer, Der Nister, and His Ambivalence Towards Zionism - Forward

Modi in Israel: Prime Minister makes impromptu visit to grave of … – The Indian Express

Posted By on July 6, 2017

By: PTI | Jerusalem | Published:July 4, 2017 11:39 pm Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visit the tomb of Theodor Herzl, in Jerusalem, Israel on Tuesday. PTI Photo

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday made an impromptu visit to the grave of Theodor Herzl, who is considered as the founding father of Zionism, at the suggestion of his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu. Modi, who visited the Yad Vashem Museum and honoured the victims of the Holocaust, was suggested by Netanyahu, apparently spontaneously, that they visit the grave of Herzl born Benjamin Zeev Herzl which lies adjacent to the memorial.

Prime Minister Modi agreed on the suggestion and the two leaders visited the marble tomb at Mt. Herzl. Modi placed a small rock on the marble tomb as Netanyahu watched with a smile.

PM Netanyahu and @PMOIndia Modi visited Mt. Herzl in Jerusalem, and paid their respects to the founder of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, the official Twitter account of the Office of the Prime Minister of Israel tweeted. It also posted a brief video that showed Modi placing his hand on the tomb.

Before departing the Yad Vashem complex the leaders visited the Grave of Theodor Herzl Chozeh HaMedinah (lit. Visionary of the State), Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Gopal Baglay tweeted. Herzl was an Austro-Hungarian journalist, playwright, political activist, and writer who is considered the founding father of Zionism a movement to establish a Jewish homeland.

He died in 1904 at the age of 44 and buried in a cemetery in Vienna. In 1949, his remains were moved from Vienna to be reburied on the top of Mount Herzl in Jerusalem, named in his memory.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

Follow this link:
Modi in Israel: Prime Minister makes impromptu visit to grave of ... - The Indian Express

Bava Batra 158 and 159 – Jewish Link of New Jersey

Posted By on July 6, 2017

May these words of Torah serve as a merit leiluy nishmat Menachem Mendel ben Harav Yoel David Balk, ah.

This week we learned Bava Batra 158 and 159. These are some highlights.

Bava Batra 158: The air of the Land of Israel makes you wise. Why, then, is Halacha in accordance with the Babylonian Talmud? Shouldnt the Jerusalem Talmud win the disputes?

Our daf relates that Rabbi Zeira moved from Bavel to the Land of Israel. In Bavel, he had one opinion about a law. After he settled in Israel, he reversed himself and arrived at a different conclusion. He explained his actions. The air of the Land of Israel makes one wise. Living in Israel had made him wiser and it had led him to a new conclusion. In Bava Metzia (85a) the Gemara relates that Rabbi Zeira fasted one hundred fasts to forget his learning that he has absorbed in Bavel and to merit to successfully acquire the Torah from scholars in Israel. In the Midrash (Bereishit Rabba 16:4) we are taught, Ain Torah keYorat Eretz Yisrael, There is no Torah like the Torah of the Land of Israel, Vlo chochma kchochmat Eretz Yisrael, and there is no wisdom like the wisdom of Israel.

We possess two Talmuds. There is a Talmud that was put together in Israel under the leadership of Rabbi Yochanan, the Jerusalem Talmud, and there is a Talmud that was put together by Rav Ashi in Babylonia, the Babylonian Talmud. The Babylonian Talmud is studied far more than the Jerusalem Talmud. When we have a dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud, Halacha accepts the rulings of the Babylonian Talmud. This is true even when the Babylonian Talmud is more lenient than the Jerusalem Talmud (see Rif end of Eruvin, Introduction to the Talmud by Rabbi Shmuel Hanagid, and Semag Lavin 65).

Why was the Babylonian Talmud accepted so broadly? Dont the Sages in Israel benefit from the holy air of the Land of Israel? Why, then, does Halacha follow the rulings of the Babylonian Talmud and not the rulings of the Sages of the Holy Land?

Rav Hai Gaon (quoted in Sefer HaEshkol Hilchot Sefer Torah) gives an answer. The Sages of Israel are wiser than the sages of Babylonia. However, Israel was a place afflicted with challenges when the Talmud was composed. There were many persecutions from the Romans and Christians. In Babylonia, the Sages were under the rule of the Persianswho were tolerant and allowed for the free practice of our faith. While the air and Sages of Israel were more gifted, the persecutions in Israel prevented the scholars there from reaching the heights of knowledge that the scholars of Babylonia reached. In Babylonia they were able to better their learning. Halacha therefore accords with them.

Maharik (Shoresh 91) gives another reason for the centrality of the Babylonian Talmud. The Babylonian Talmud was composed by Rav Ashi many years after the completion of the Jerusalem Talmud. Rav Ashi had in front of him the Talmud Yerushalmi when he composed the Talmud Bavli. He knew the conclusions of the Sages of Israel, and yet he sometimes chose to rule against them. In Halacha we usually accept the last point of view. When later Sages argue with their predecessors, we accept the view of the later authorities. Earlier Sages were greater scholars. Yet, the later ones knew their arguments and still reached different conclusions. We usually therefore accept the later conclusions for they took into account the earlier proposals and rejected them (See Rosh Sanhedrin 4:6, Tosafot Kiddushin 45b s.v. Hava, Rama Choshen Mishpat 25:2). (Meorot Daf Hayomi)

Bava Batra 159: Does a grandson inherit the rabbinic position of his maternal grandfather?

Our Gemara has a fascinating discussion about the law that a grandson inherits the assets of his grandfather. How does this law work? Is it that the assets come to the domain of the son, in the grave, and the grandson then receives them from his deceased father, or do the assets move directly from the grandfather to the grandson since the son is not alive? The difference between these understandings would be in regard to people who lent money to the deceased son. If the assets of the grandfather first go to his son and then to the grandson, the creditors would be entitled to seize assets. They had been in the domain of the son, the son owed them, so the lenders could seize the property for their debts. But if the assets move directly from grandfather to grandson, then the lenders to the son would not be entitled to take any of the assets. The properties were never owned by the person who owed them money and therefore they could not seize anything. Our Gemara mentions that there is a point of view that holds that a grandson inherits directly from his grandfather.

If Rabbi Yaakov gets appointed as the rabbi of a city and then passes away, Rama (Yoreh Deiah 245:22) rules like Rivash (Siman 271) that his son should inherit the position. What about a rabbi who only had a daughter? She had a son. Does a grandson inherit the rabbinic position of his maternal grandfather? If the inheritance of a grandson comes through his father in the grave, in our case, the grandson should not inherit. His mother is not entitled to the rabbinic position of her father. But if the grandson inherits directly from the grandfather, perhaps a grandson can inherit the rabbinic position directly from his maternal grandfather.

Poskim discuss the law of a son-in-law. Would a son-in-law inherit the rabbinic position of his wifes father? Shut Avodat HaGershuni (Siman 49) rules that a son-in-law does not inherit his father-in-laws rabbinic post. A husband can inherit his wifes property. However, a wife has no claim to serve as the rabbi. Judaism does not allow for women rabbis. Therefore, if the father-in-law died, the son-in-law has no claim to the position. Shut Beit Yitzchak (Yoreh Deiah Chelek Bet Siman 69-70) disagrees. The son claiming a position of his father is not normal inheritance. It is not money or an item of value moving from one generation to the next. The Torah commanded that when a rabbi passes away his son should receive the position. A son-in-law can fulfill this task as well. If the son-in-law is deserving, the son-in-law is the one the community should appoint. Beit Yitzchak argues that in the case when the son-in-law passed away and there is a grandson, even Avodat HaGershuni should agree that the grandson inherits the position. Our Gemara taught that a grandson might inherit directly from his grandfather. A daughter is not entitled to her fathers position; however, the grandson has a direct link to his zayde. The community should appoint the grandson if the grandfather passes away. Shut Simchat Yom Tov (Siman 6) disagrees with Beit Yitzchak. He argues that according to Avodat HaGershuni a grandson is not entitled to the position of his mothers father. (Mesivta)

By Rabbi Zev Reichman

Rabbi Zev Reichman teaches Daf Yomi in his shul, East Hill Synagogue.

Go here to see the original:

Bava Batra 158 and 159 - Jewish Link of New Jersey


Page 1,559«..1020..1,5581,5591,5601,561..1,5701,580..»

matomo tracker