In Leopoldstadt, Tom Stoppard shows that theres a difference between a Jew of culture and a cultural Jew – Forward

Posted By on October 4, 2022

Brandon Uranowitz, Caissie Levey, Faye Castelow and David Krumholtz in Leopoldstadt. Photo by Joan Marcus

By PJ GrisarOctober 03, 2022

The first, and strongest, scene in Tom Stoppards Leopoldstadt is abuzz with activity and ideas.

The play opens in 1899 in a wealthy, bourgeois apartment off the Ringstrasse in Vienna. Theres a Christmas tree bearing candles, soon to be claimed as interfaith courtesy of a Star of David topper. The adults are looking at books: Herzls Judenstaat, Freuds Interpretation of Dreams, a racy, unpublished play by Arthur Schnitzler. The Catholic wife of the master of the house mentions that shell be sitting for a portrait for Gustav Klimt. Theres also a family photo album, a key prop that gets lost in the shuffle.

At some point, the many children some baptized and with a Christian parent scuttle off to see a nativity scene. In the lull, two brothers-in-law, the upwardly mobile and newly Christianized Hermann (David Krumholtz) and Ludwig (Brandon Uranowitz), a Jewish mathematician denied professorship by quotas, discuss the Jewish question.

Hermann, having come of age during the emancipation of Austrias Jews, believes assimilation will win out in the new century.

We worship culture! Hermann insists, listing the luminaries of the empire from Haydn to Brahms, and dismissing the bygone pogroms and expulsions that will, in the course of two hours and four generations, return to afflict the family.

Ludwig is less sanguine. A Jew can be a great composer. He can be the toast of the town. But he cant not be a Jew, he says. In the end if it doesnt catch up on him, it will catch up on his children.

This ineradicable Jewishness seems to have finally caught up with Stoppard, who, almost from short pants to middle-age, lived a life largely unaffected by his Jewish background.

Of course there is a paradox: This most Anglophilic of writers only wound up in England by dint of his Jewishness. He arrived there from India (by way of Singapore), having fled the Nazi invasion with his family when he was around 18 months old. Stoppard now may call himself an English playwright of Jewish heritage, but might I hazard another description?

Stoppard is a Jew of Culture not one raised with Yiddishkeit, but a Jew obsessed with culture and history often to the detriment of feeling. Cerebral, Stoppardian detachment strikes again, but it is more disappointing given this plays material and, in the end, its desire to confront familial alienation head on.

Leopoldstadt is in many ways grandly ambitious, following the prosperous Merz family of garment manufacturers and the humbler Jacobovicz clan, who have relations back in Galicia, from the end of the 19th century to Kristallnacht, with a small coda in the 1950s for Stoppard to self-flagellate over his earlier indifference to the past. But too often it insists on letting us know what exactly is happening on the world stage, caring less for what else is affecting the large cast of characters.

After a contrived subplot featuring a dragoon and an affair, were whisked away to the 1920s. We know its the 1920s because someone is doing the Charleston. But we also know because theres a wounded veteran of the Great War, Hermanns son, Jacob (Seth Numrich, doing too much), who were meeting for the first time. He declaims about the politics of the day alongside relatives who range from a socialist to a Marxist disposition. Offstage the family awaits a mohel. Its too broad and farcical, and that may be because Stoppard, having no firsthand experience with a bris at least as an adult apparently deferred to Fran Lebowitz for insight.

Instead of developing relationships, or even providing us with some steady reminder of who everyone is now that theyve been aged up or just made their first entrance, Stoppard is intent on giving us a history lesson. (He is a sometimes spotty student, if I can nitpick. Would Hermann really first be discovering Judenstaat nearly four years after it was published and two years after the First Zionist Congress? How is a character just returning from the Evian Conference in July 1938, just in time for Kristallnacht that November?)

Director Patrick Marber, who also helmed the West End production, marshals a large cast to great, efficient effect. The penultimate scene, when the Nazis arrive, is chilling, but not for its particulars. Though weve been with the family for well over an hour, and seen the changes in some, we scarcely know who half of them are. We may recall their views on Zionism or Jewish identity, but so much is steamrolled to make a point about the grand reversal of fortune and the shifting political winds that there is no room left for much else. In a way, this is the point, illustrated by a matriarchs remark that its like a second death, to lose your name in a family album, but dramatically this is little consolation.

When I learned that this play was two hours long, I wondered if this would be a speed-through of things Stoppard would rather not discuss. One cant avoid the fact that, in his masterpiece Arcadia, he spent well over two hours meditating on past and present via Georgian-era landscaping and, in Coast of Utopia, devoted over nine hours to pre-revolutionary Russian socialists. One would expect his own Jewish autobiography to warrant a bit more stage time. Though profiles have promoted the play as a final confrontation with a past Stoppard was ashamed not to have interrogated, is it in fact another dodge?

In a sense its not, as it is not much of an autobiography at all. Everything, down to the decision to set the drama in Austria rather than Czechoslovakia, appears guided more by Stoppards veneration of cultural figures and historical factors. That and a concern for the dramatic. Its not simply that he may prefer Freud or Klimt or Schnitzler (who hes adapted) as a touchstone over Kafka, but that it is richer to debate the status of Jews in the land that produced Hitler.

If assimilation, as well as the refugee crisis and the emergence of fascism, are meant to align with contemporary concerns, they are too granular in their renderings to carry much resonance for me. And, though this is likely the point of the intermissionless runtime, the developments are too rushed.

In the plays final movement, things slow down and do go somewhat deep with Stoppards psyche. The cast is whittled down to three, the set stripped bare. Were meant to feel the absence, but also the plays reason for existing. Leo Chamberlain (formerly Leopold Rosenbaum, played by Arty Froushan), a self-satisfied young Brit with a bit of a literary career, turns up in Vienna to meet his surviving relatives. An undisguised self-insert, Leo has a case of foot-in-mouth disease, at one point telling his cousin who survived Auschwitz, Im sorry you had a rotten war.

Leo, who escaped to Britain and led a charmed, lucky life, at last recalls a history hed forgotten in a room where he once lived. And in a moment that may be drawn most fully from Stoppards own experience, the other relative draws him a family tree, and tells him the fate of each branch.

Stoppard should be kinder to himself. Unlike Leo, he was too young to have forged a memory of his homeland and the people murdered miles from its borders. Should you know little of the playwrights own history, Leos short time on the stage may feel out of place. It does, however, return to a central theme about assimilation and its limits.

In the opening scene, Ludwig lays it out for Hermann. We worship culture, he concedes. But, Hermann, assimilation doesnt mean to stop being a Jew.

For much of his life and career, Stoppard seemed to test this axiom. Leopoldstadt announces Stoppards arrival as a writer on Jewish themes, but a worshipper of culture above all.

More here:

In Leopoldstadt, Tom Stoppard shows that theres a difference between a Jew of culture and a cultural Jew - Forward

Related Post


Comments are closed.