Pearce’s Potshots #49: Homer & the Gospels | Dave Armstrong – Patheos
Posted By admin on October 17, 2021
Mythmaking Scholar Suggests the Story of Priam in the Iliad as the Model for a Fictional Joseph of Arimathea
Atheist anti-theist Jonathan M. S. Pearce is the main writer on the blog,A Tippling Philosopher.HisAbout pagestates: Pearce is a philosopher, author, blogger, public speaker and teacher from Hampshire in the UK. He specialises in philosophy of religion, but likes to turnhis hand to science, psychology, politics and anything involved in investigating reality. His words will be inblue.
*****
Presently, I am responding to his article, Mimesis, the Gospels, and Their Greek Sources (10-14-21).
Iforgot literally forgot to put in my Joseph of Arimathea section in myResurrection bookthe very robust theory that Joseph of Arimathea was modelled mimetically on Priam from HomersIliad.
I really do need to release a second edition already because there issoso much about the Gospels is a case are emulating openly and intentionally these Greek sources. . . .
I have been privy to [Dennis R.] MacDonalds Magnum Opus on this, hopefully forthcoming from someone, somewhere. Its masterful and leaves you with no doubt. After all, when every Greek writer would have learned Greek through reading and writing the Greek epics and classics, such as Homers works, then there is no surprise that such works end up being used and reformulated into the Gospels.
Lex Lata in the combox:
My inexpert sense is that some of MacDonalds connections might be on the unduly tenuous and speculative side, but his overall argument is pretty solid. Theres no question the NT authors were, if not actually themselves, Hellenized Jews and Christians who were literate in Koine Greek. And, as noted in this video, becoming literate in Greek in antiquity routinely involved memorizing, reciting, transcribing, and translating elements of particularly renowned works, such as the Iliad and other literary and philosophical classics. So, unsurprisingly, there is not only a substantial likelihood of direct or indirect narrative mimesis in certain NT passages, but also a number of known borrowings from pagan writers like Menander and Epimenides.
Early Christianity wasnt merely Judaism 2.0it was a fusion of Hebrew and Greco-Roman traditions, cultures, rhetoric, and metaphysics.
St. Paul mentioned Menander and Epimenides in the course of his evangelism, in order to connect with his particular audience of Greek intellectuals (in his interaction with Epicurean and Stoic philosophers on Mars Hill in Athens: Acts 17). But this is worlds away from supposedly grabbing elements in Greek literature as a basis of fabricated stories within an overall alleged fictional Gospel.
The scholar that Pearce is appealing to in this post is Dennis R MacDonald (born 1946). According to his Wikipedia page, he is the John Wesley Professor of New Testament and Christian Origins at the Claremont School of Theology inCalifornia. MacDonald proposes a theory wherein the earliest books of theNew Testamentwere responses to the Homeric Epics, including theGospel of Markand theActs of the Apostles. The methodology he pioneered is calledMimesis Criticism.
The article describes his central thesis:
InChristianizing Homer, MacDonald lays down his principles of literarymimesis, his methodology for comparing ancient texts. There are six aspects he examines 1) accessibility, 2) analogy, 3) density, 4) order, 5) distinctive traits, and 6) interpretability.[1]According to his hypothesis, not only was Homer readily available to the authors of the New Testament, but the Homeric epics would have been the basic texts upon which the New Testament authors learned to write Greek. MacDonald also argues that the number of common traits, the order in which they occur, and the distinctiveness thereof between the Homeric Texts and early Christian documents help to show that the New Testament writers were using Homeric models when writing various books.
In his earliest reviews, MacDonald only applied his hypothesis to works such asTobitand theActs of Peter. In later works, he posits the Acts of the Apostles, the Gospel of Mark, and Gospel of Luke merged two cultural classics of his time period in order to depict Jesus as more compassionate, powerful, noble, and inured to suffering than Odysseus.
MacDonalds most famous work, however, isThe Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark. According to MacDonald, the Gospel of Mark is a deliberate and conscious anti-epic, an inversion of the Greek Bible of Homers Iliad and Odyssey, which in a sense updates and Judaizes the outdated heroic values presented by Homer, in the figure of a new hero.[4]
The book begins by examining the role that the Homeric Epics played in antiquitynamely that anybody who was considered educated at the time learned to read and write, and they did so by studying the Odyssey and Iliad. Students were expected, not only to understand the epics, but be able to rewrite the stories in their own words. Rewriting the Homeric Epics was commonplace and accepted in Biblical times.[4]
. . . Marks purpose, he argues, in creating so many stories about Jesus was to demonstrate how superior [Jesus] was to Greek heroes. Few readers of Mark fail to see how he portrays Jesus as superior to Jewish worthies He does the same for Greek heroes.[1]
The same article presents withering criticism of MacDonalds work from other scholars:
MacDonalds thesis has not found acceptance and has received strong criticism by other scholars.[5][6][7][8][9]Karl Olav Sandnes notes the vague nature of alleged parallels as the Achilles heel of the slippery project. He has also questioned the nature of the alleged paralleled motifs, seeing MacDonalds interpretations of common motives. He states, His [MacDonalds] reading is fascinating and contributes to a reader-orientated exegesis. But he fails to demonstrate authorial intention while he, in fact, neglects the OT intertextuality that is broadcast in this literature.
Daniel Gullotta from Stanford similarly writes MacDonalds list of unconvincing comparisons goes on and has been noted by numerous critics. Despite MacDonalds worthy call for scholars to reexamine the educational practices of the ancient world, all of the evidence renders his position of Homeric influential dominance untenable.[10]
Adam Winn, though adopting MacDonalds methods of mimetic criticism, concluded after a detailed analysis of MacDonalds theses and comparisons between Homer and Mark that MacDonald is unable to provide a single example of clear and obvious Markan interpretation of Homer because MacDonalds evidence is at best suggestive, it will ultimately convince few.[11]
David Litwa argues that problematic parts of MacDonalds thesis include that he construes both large ranges of similarity in addition to large range of difference as evidence for parallel, that he alters his parallels in order to make them more convincing like suggesting that Jesus walking on water is comparable to Athena and Hermes flying above water, that he has an inconsistent application of his own six criteria (where he often uses only one or two to establish parallel and thus relies largely on loose structural standards of similarity), and that he often has completely unconvincing parallels such as his comparison of Odysseus on a floating island to Jesus sitting in a boat that floats on water.[12]
What has Pearce so excited that he can hardly contain himself, is MacDonalds comparison of Joseph of Arimathea with the character Priam, in Homers Iliad. Encyclopaedia Britannica (Priam) describes the material that is the basis for such a comparison:
In the final year of the conflict, Priam saw 13 sons die: the Greek warriorAchilleskilled Polydorus,Lycaon, and Hector within one day. The death of Hector, which signified the end of Troys hopes, also broke the spirit of the king. Priams paternal love impelled him to brave the savage anger of Achilles and to ransom the corpse of Hector; Achilles, respecting the old mans feelings and foreseeing his own fathers sorrows, returned the corpse.
This is compared to the Gospel accounts:
Matthew 27:57-58 (RSV) When it was evening, there came a rich man from Arimathea, named Joseph, who also was a disciple of Jesus. [58] He went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. Then Pilate ordered it to be given to him. (cf. Mk 15:43-45; Lk 23:50-52; Jn 19:38)
Now note how MacDonald accuses the Gospel writers of pure fabrication:
Although it is possible that a woman of this name [Mary Magdalene] once existed, it is more likely that Mark created her to populate his narrative.
. . . It will not be Joseph of Nazareth who buries him but Joseph of Arimathea. Marks penchant for creating characters to contrast with Jesus family and closest disciples applies also to the names of the women at the tomb. (The Gospels and Homer, 2014, p. 95)
Id like to know how one proves that a named person didnt exist, but was merely made up? On what basis is that done? How does MacDonald know that it is more likely that Mark made up or created Mary Magdalene? The Christian would say that if the Gospel writers historical accuracy has been established times without number from archaeology and historical verification (as they assuredly have been), then they can be trusted in cases where they mention a person or event for the first time. MacDonalds skepticism is arbitrary and unfounded.
He asserts this numerous times in this book:
Mark . . . adds fifteen other place names, five of which are not independently attested: Dalmanoutha, Bethphage, Arimathea, Gethsemane, and Golgotha. As we shall see, he likely created them. (Ibid., p. 2)
In fact, Bethphage occurs in several Talmudic passages where it may be inferred that it was near but outside Jerusalem; it was at the Sabbatical distance limit East of Jerusalem, and was surrounded by some kind of wall. (International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Bethphage). The Talmud was based on Jewish religious teachings and commentary that was transmitted orally for centuries (Encyclopaedia Britannica: Jerusalem Talmud), Thus. MacDonald is wrong about its non-biblical attestation.
[T]he Markan Evangelist apparently did not inherit most of his characters and episodes from antecedent traditions and texts; he created them by imitating classical Greek poetry, especially the Homeric epics, the Odyssey above all. (Ibid., p. 2)
She assumes that Mark inherited this tale from oral tradition, but more than likely he created it in imitation of Il. [Iliad] 24. (p. 101)
Virtually all solutions have presumed that the anointing story [Mt 26:6-13] was pre-Markan, but it is more likely that Mark himself created it with an eye to Eurycleias anointing of Odysseus . . . (p. 156)
If Mark created Jesus prayer from antecedents in Od. [Odyssey] 10.496-501 . . . (p. 223)
Luke . . . apparently created a story . . . (p. 239)
Mark . . . more than likely created his account from literary models. (p. 241)
If Mark created the choice between Jesus and Barabbas by imitating the suitors choice between Odysseus and the violent beggar Irus . . . (p. 297)
If Mark were responsible for creating the episode of Judass betrayal after the treachery of Homers Melanthius . . . (p. 318)
Protestant theologian Ronald V. Huggins offers an exhaustive critique of MacDonalds questioning of the existence of Judas Iscariot and the stories about him: Did Judas Exist? A Friendly Critique of Dennis R. MacDonalds Easter Time Blog (4-22-16). Other critical pieces:
Homer in the New Testament? (Margaret M. Mitchell, The Journal of Religion,Volume 83, Number 2 Apr., 2003).
Imitatio Homeri? An Appraisal of Dennis R. MacDonalds Mimesis Criticism (Karl Sandnes, December 2005, Journal of Biblical Literature 124(4):715).
Arbitrary claims that the Gospel writers simply made up fictional elements in real-life persons, based on characters in Homer or other Greek writers cant be proven. Its subjective mush: like much of atheist exegesis of the Bible and delusional, fictional, self-serving theories of Bible-writing.
The ridiculous notion that any conceivable similarity with pagan Greek literature in the Bible must be because of deliberate causation (and furthermore, in the service of supposed invention of mythical persons and events),is the fallacy (among others, no doubt) ofpost hoc ergo propter hoc(Latin: after this, therefore because of this).
Atheists (in this case and others, drawing from skeptical, anti-traditional, heterodox Christian scholars) have all these theories about how the biblical stories came to be, without any hard evidence that it is so. They dont, of course, believe in revelation as we do. We think the Bible is historically reliable (for various reasons: independent confirmation from history, archaeology, etc.), and believe in faith that it is inspired, in part based on this reliability, and so we accept its report on miracles.
With the atheist, on the other hand, with no God and no miracles or supernatural phenomena, the burden is to prove things strictly based on the hard evidence of historiography, texts, etc.What evidence would there be for this theory? None that I can see . . . So there was a similarity between Joseph asking for the body of Jesus and a character in The Iliad.Sowhat? One could findhundredsof similarities, and they all would prove exactlynothing.
To some extent its true that the gospels were influenced by Greco-Roman literary culture. Influence is always a factor: just by the nature of ideas and thinking persons. What orthodox Christians oppose is the notion of deliberate mythmaking.
***
Photo credit: Marble terminal bust of Homer. Roman copy of a lost Hellenistic original of the 2nd c. BC. From Baiae, Italy. In the British Museum [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]
***
Summary: Atheist Jonathan MS Pearce enlists NT scholar Dennis R. MacDonald, who writes on Homer & the Gospels & posits widespread mythical creation in the Gospels.
Read the original:
Pearce's Potshots #49: Homer & the Gospels | Dave Armstrong - Patheos
- The Supremacy Of Torah - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - May 22nd, 2022
- Thanking G-d For Who You Are And Who You Are Not - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - May 22nd, 2022
- Shabbat Behar: Valuing the Land J-Wire - J-Wire Jewish Australian News Service - May 22nd, 2022
- Celebrate with our community at the Jewish Federation Annual Meeting - Jewish Community Voice - May 18th, 2022
- Here comes Alice Walker and the Jews, again - The Jewish Star - May 18th, 2022
- Torah prioritizes the mother's life and health | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle - thejewishchronicle.net - May 18th, 2022
- Baseless Hatred is Destroying Our Nation - The Stream - May 18th, 2022
- The Year Of Slipping Away (Part I) - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - May 18th, 2022
- Seeking help both for ourselves and fellow Jews - The Jewish Star - May 18th, 2022
- Baddiel: Jews Don't Count TV documentary will have 'surprising' differences to book - Jewish News - May 18th, 2022
- In Israel, Tzaddikim Are Buried All Around - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - May 18th, 2022
- The Fight is Part of the Mitzvah - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - May 18th, 2022
- Planting the seeds of inclusivity - Jewish News - May 18th, 2022
- The Opening of the Shema Prayer Explained - jewishboston.com - May 18th, 2022
- Why Ed Koch's response to AIDS was very political and not very Jewish - Forward - May 18th, 2022
- The Scandalous History of the Aleppo Codex - aish.com - Aish - May 16th, 2022
- Loving And Living With Dead Jews - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - May 16th, 2022
- Buffalo shooting: how white replacement theory keeps inspiring mass murder - The Guardian - May 16th, 2022
- What's the Omer? - J-Wire Jewish Australian News Service - May 14th, 2022
- The Fall of 'Roe' would also be an attack on religious liberty - St. Louis Jewish Light - May 14th, 2022
- This bird you cannot change | Yardaena Osband | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - May 14th, 2022
- The Eight Genders in the Talmud | My Jewish Learning - April 20th, 2022
- A Class of Their Own - Tablet Magazine - April 20th, 2022
- How Matzah and the Teshuvas HaRashba Saved Yidden from Terrorism - VINnews - April 20th, 2022
- Do We Have the Game All Wrong?: Natasha Lyonnes Cosmic Journey Into Russian Doll Season 2 - Rolling Stone - April 20th, 2022
- First night of Passover and Good Friday bonding. - KABC - April 20th, 2022
- Holding The High Line: Rapids Charlotte Preview - Last Word on Soccer - April 20th, 2022
- Ascending from slavery: Why I fight for the Temple Mount - The Times of Israel - April 20th, 2022
- "I live my life my way and my wife lives hers as a religious person. It does not have to fit in" | CTech - CTech - April 20th, 2022
- Does Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine Portend The Coming Of Mashiach? - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - April 20th, 2022
- Missouri moves closer to legalized sports betting. Are Jews allowed to gamble? - St. Louis Jewish Light - April 13th, 2022
- Why did Jesus dip a piece of food and give it to Judas? - Aleteia - April 13th, 2022
- Should we forgive slave owner Tobias Rustat? | Derek Taylor | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - April 13th, 2022
- The Pundit: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Nomination and the Jewish Approach to Textual Interpretation - The Commentator - The Commentator - April 13th, 2022
- In Egypt, Walking in the Footsteps of the Exodus - aish.com - Aish - April 13th, 2022
- The Prince of Egypt Gets Part of The Exodus Wrong - Solzy at the Movies - April 13th, 2022
- Israel's Minister of the Hyphen - Tablet Magazine - April 13th, 2022
- Gemara: The Essence of the Talmud | My Jewish Learning - April 9th, 2022
- Who Was Elijah and Why Do Jews Open the Door for Him on Passover? - jewishboston.com - April 9th, 2022
- The Contemporary Metropolis and Reshut HaRabbim - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - April 9th, 2022
- March Madness for Jews: Why the Sarachek tournament is such a big Orthodox deal - Forward - April 9th, 2022
- The Second Season of 'The New Black' Is Even Better Than the First - Algemeiner - April 9th, 2022
- Expel that yeast! (And get rid of the thorn from your own life) J. - The Jewish News of Northern California - April 9th, 2022
- Leading the people back to Egypt | Joshua Berman | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - April 9th, 2022
- Stop trying to get Jews to date each other and start focusing on nurturing friendships - Forward - April 9th, 2022
- Q & A: The Mitzvah Of Maggid (Part III) - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - April 9th, 2022
- Q & A: Will The 'Real' Adar Please Stand Up? (Part I) - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - March 12th, 2022
- The UK's immigration system is not fit to respond to the Ukrainian refugee crisis - PoliticsHome - March 12th, 2022
- Correlating the Nuremberg Nazis and the 10 Sons of Haman - VINnews - March 8th, 2022
- Yichud And Its Messages For Therapists - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - March 8th, 2022
- Im a cantor in Texas and parent of a trans child. My states assault on trans youth is terrifying - Forward - March 8th, 2022
- Broken Box Mime Theater to Present World Premiere of TAKE SHAPE - Broadway World - March 8th, 2022
- We Jews of Ukraine ask: Why is Israel abandoning our country? - Haaretz - March 3rd, 2022
- Opinion: The fight to criminalize abortion is about religion, and as a non-Christian, it's a violation of mine - Columbia Chronicle - March 3rd, 2022
- A Scholarly Rabbi Comments on the Book of Esther and More - San Diego Jewish World - March 3rd, 2022
- Join Rabbis Stiffman, Goldstein to learn The Spirituality of Laughter - St. Louis Jewish Light - March 3rd, 2022
- After departing Ukraine, Kyiv rabbi says hes working to help those left behind - The Times of Israel - March 3rd, 2022
- It is not yet time to unmask - The Jewish Standard - March 3rd, 2022
- Last Chance: Lowest Prices of the Year Ends at Midnight! - VINnews - February 26th, 2022
- Jewish history is repeating itself in Ukraine. This time, we must fight Putin back - Forward - February 26th, 2022
- The women's precious gifts, made with consummate skill - The Times of Israel - February 26th, 2022
- Malice In Wonderland - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - February 26th, 2022
- Royal Family: The disgusting reason why the Queen's most famous 3billion crown is purple - My London - February 26th, 2022
- Tying The Knot - aish.com - Aish - February 26th, 2022
- At 78, a long-anticipated theatrical debut (with thanks to Edward Albee) - Forward - February 26th, 2022
- 5 ways Jewish culture shaped 'Star Trek,' from Gates of Heaven - Albany Times Union - February 26th, 2022
- Why Are There Two Talmuds? The Answer: The Diaspora - Algemeiner - February 21st, 2022
- MOScout Daily Update: Kehoe Gets FOP for 2024 - Steve West Again... - Reaction to Danforth Plan and more... Missouri Scout - Moscout - February 21st, 2022
- Of God and war - The Jewish Standard - February 21st, 2022
- Rapids Podcast: CCL Fever, Chris Cartlidge Interview - Last Word on Baseball - February 21st, 2022
- Now Is the Time! ArtScroll's 30%-Off Talmud and Mishnah Sale - VINnews - February 11th, 2022
- Rabbinic Rabies and Rabid Rabbis the 'Mad Dog' in Talmudic Texts - The Media Line - February 11th, 2022
- Opinion | In the Jewish Tradition, the Words We Choose Matter - The New York Times - February 11th, 2022
- Written in the Book of Life: On Kathryn Schulz's Lost & Found - lareviewofbooks - February 11th, 2022
- Why the Torah cares so much about these two little sheep J. - The Jewish News of Northern California - February 11th, 2022
- True colors | Meirav Kravetz | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - February 11th, 2022
- How inclusive are we willing to be? | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle - thejewishchronicle.net - February 11th, 2022
- Raunchy, sarcastic TikTok Talmud commentary isn't profane; it's Torah - The Times of Israel - January 30th, 2022
- Talmudic Legal Thinking: Author Brings Humor, Sports and Celebrities to this Serious Topic Detroit Jewish News - The Jewish News - January 30th, 2022
- Former teacher banned 'indefinitely' over charges of sexual misconduct - Jewish News - January 30th, 2022
Comments