Nathan Thrall calls out J St and other liberal Zionists for enabling apartheid Mondoweiss – Mondoweiss
Posted By admin on January 26, 2021
We all understand that this is a time of tremendous potential shift in the discourse of Palestine in the U.S. When Joe Biden comes in, liberal Zionists, who can take some credit for electing him, will make up the central branch of the Israel lobby inside the Democratic Party. Secretary of State Tony Blinken is their friend. So is his deputy Wendy Sherman. So liberal Zionists will own our Israel policy.
And Biden along with liberal Zionists will be coming under huge pressure from the Democratic left, the Sandersite progressives who have been fighting for Palestinian rights in the halls of Congress, to actually do something at last for Palestinian freedom.
The latest sign of this pressure are the official reports saying Israel is enforcing apartheid, notably Yesh Din last July and BTselem last week. These follow a similar declaration years ago by the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, among others. And when Israel is declared apartheid state, theres one plain outcome: Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions.
To this list of pressures Id add a brilliant analysis by Nathan Thrall in the London Review of Books, titled The Separate Regimes Delusion. Thralls thrust is that liberal Zionists have bolstered the persistence of apartheid by insisting that thats not happening in Israel, its only the West Bank. Israel is a democracy! There are two regimes here! Thralls piece is a careful and lacerating exposition of the damage caused by the claim that the two regimes can be separated. Apartheid has been the order of the day in Israel since 1948.
And: Thrall names names. The Jerusalem-based author of The Only Language They Understand (and recently-departed head of the Arab-Israeli project at International Crisis Group) calls out J Street, Peace Now, and New Israel Fund among others for trafficking in a lie that is crushing Palestinians lives.
The importance of this piece is underlined by Ken Roth, the head of Human Rights Watch, who tweeted: Supporters of Israel shouldnt pretend that the government within its 1967 borders is somehow different from the government presiding over the occupied territories. Its one government with responsibility for its conduct between the river and the sea.
Lets go to Thralls points. Liberal Zionists brag that they killed annexation. I think thats true. Israel might have gone ahead if the Democratic Partys Israel lobby hadnt organized Democrats to oppose annexation. Thrall writes acidly that they didnt really care about democracy but Israels image and the danger of fostering BDS:
[L]iberal Zionist groups. reasons for opposing annexation were telling. Concern for human rights was often secondary to the harm annexation might do to Israel. They warned that it would damage the perception of Israel as a democracy. They urged Israelis not to give impetus to campaigns promoting boycotts or the reduction of economic and military aid, and cautioned that annexation would only widen the divide between Israel and the Jewish diaspora. And they brandished the spectre most feared by the Zionist left: that Israel will eventually be forced to give citizenship to all Palestinians living under its control
But what kind of democracy is it if millions of Palestinians are having their political fate shaped by Jewish Zionists? My emphasis:
Palestinians were almost entirely absent from the debate on annexation. The questions of whether they would get a state, what territory and powers it would have, whether they would be granted citizenship, residency or some other status in the annexed territory, what rights they would or would not be given and which of them would be stripped of their Israeli citizenship were being decided solely by coalition negotiations [in 2020] between two Zionist parties.
Annexation threatened the liberal Zionist figleaf: that all that bad shit is happening in another place, the occupation, which is a temporary military affair Even the fiercest critics of annexation, Thrall writes, described Israel as a functioning democracy.
He doesnt accept the distinction.
The premise that Israel is a democracy, maintained by Peace Now, Meretz, the editorial board of Haaretz and other critics of occupation, rests on the belief that one can separate the pre-1967 state from the rest of the territory under its control. A conceptual wall must be maintained between two regimes: (good) democratic Israel and its (bad) provisional occupation. This way of thinking is of a piece with the general liberal Zionist belief that its legitimate to condemn Israeli settlements and even, for some, to boycott their products but not to call for reducing support to the government that planned, established and maintains them. What seemed most troubling about annexation for these groups was that it would undermine their claims that the occupation is occurring somewhere outside the state and that it is temporary, a 53-year-long departure from what liberal Zionist groups like the New Israel Fund call Israels liberal democratic founding values.
Thrall details the ways in which Israel is practicing apartheid in the West Bank, an argument familiar to our readers, and one that even liberal Zionists allow. But military occupation gives the liberal Zionists a legalistic copout. Theres two regimes, they say yes, for 53 years!
Thrall calls out J Street and its donors and acolytes, and the politicians it influences, for trafficking in falsehoods:
By asserting the existence of two regimes, liberal Zionist groups like J Street can tell donors, legislators and university students that they are pro-Israel, while criticising an occupation that allegedly exists somewhere beyond the state. But the attempt to separate Israel from the criticisms, and consequences, of its policies in the West Bank also leads to absurd and false assertions, such as J Streets recent claim that Israeli settlers are demolishing [Palestinian] homes. In fact, it is not the settlers one in ten Israeli Jews but the government of Israel, which J Street supports, that destroys Palestinian homes in the West Bank. The government does so at the behest of elected ministers and legislators.
The separate-regimes fiction allows liberal Zionists and their Democratic Party friends to cling to a supposed solution and avoid the undemocratic truth of both sides of the Green Line.
The fiction of separate regimes allows liberal Zionists to promote a politically correct two-state solution based on the pre-1967 lines, while avoiding the more equitable remedy demanded by the recognition that the Israeli state extends to all the land under its control. Such a remedy would require not only an end to occupation but also to ethnic discrimination throughout the territory.
Liberal Zionists arent for equality. They use the separate regimes b.s. to preserve inequality in Israel, which is itself apartheid.
The Zionist left doesnt call for Jewish and Palestinian citizens of Israel to have full equality within pre-1967 Israel. Instead, leading liberal Zionist organisations seek to ensure Israel remains a Jewish-majority state that can continue to provide to its Jewish citizens land and immigration rights that are denied to citizens from the indigenous Palestinian minority.
Annexation was a threat because it would destroy the liberal Zionist claim that there is an apartheid regime in the West Bank separate from the Israeli state.
But this is a misunderstanding of the crime of apartheid as described in international law. Like torture, apartheid does not need to be applied uniformly or everywhere in a country to be criminal: in international law there is no such thing as an apartheid regime, just as there is no such thing as a torture regime. The word regime doesnt appear anywhere in the original 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
Thrall goes on to say that the idea that only annexation will make Israel into an apartheid state has become intrinsic to left-wing Zionist ideology. For instance, a report from a thinktank headed by Zehava Gal-on of Meretz who is part of J Streets inauguration party tomorrow night says that even if Israel went forward with annexation that doesnt make it an apartheid state but rather a state operating a regime with apartheid characteristics in the occupied territories. Thrall blows that distinction up!
By this standard, apartheid South Africa was a democracy like all democracies, an imperfect one operating a regime with apartheid characteristics in the townships and Bantustans. Those Bantustans, incidentally, had their own flags, anthems, civil servants, parliaments, elections and a limited degree of autonomy not unlike that of the Palestinian Authority.
Thrall points out the importance of Europe and the U.S. to maintaining apartheid in Israel. The The U.S. and Europe have tirelessly maintained Israeli impunity for its actions at the UN and ICC.
He concludes by insisting on the South Africa parallel, going back to the founding of the state. And liberal Zionist responsibility.
European and American policymakers, together with the liberal Zionist groups that lobby them, maintain that the two-state solution isnt dead but merely embattled and, therefore, permanently alive. In the meantime, millions of Palestinians continue to be deprived of basic civil rights and subjected to military rule. With the exception of those six months in 1966-67, this has been the reality for the majority of Palestinians living under Israeli control for the entire history of the state. South Africas apartheid lasted 46 years. Israels is at 72, and counting.
Thats a devastating last line, and the piece is a devastating read, read it in full here.
Thralls broadside follows on several blows delivered by American Jews/former Zionists in the last year, Peter Beinart, Ian Lustick, and Jerome Slater, that suggest an erosion at last in the mainstream discourse of Palestine.
Of course, it is tragic and unfair that the dismantling of the Zionist idea is to be effected by Jews. But thats the other side of the coin of the lobby itself, which I maintain is the only game in town for Joe Bidens Middle East policy. For now anyway.
Here is the original post:
Nathan Thrall calls out J St and other liberal Zionists for enabling apartheid Mondoweiss - Mondoweiss
- The real problem with anti-Zionism | Nathaniel Helfgot | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - March 3rd, 2021
- Students seeking to silence critic of Israel hit a wall of opposition - TRT World - March 3rd, 2021
- Biden administration needs creativity to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - Palm Beach Post - March 3rd, 2021
- Zionist is not hate speech, activists say - The Real News Network - March 3rd, 2021
- The 'Most Brutal Attacks' on Jews in Europe Driven by Anti-Zionism, Says Algemeiner Editor-in-Chief - Algemeiner - March 3rd, 2021
- Jewish Voice for Peace Fights to Preserve Anti-Zionist Hatred Online - Algemeiner - March 3rd, 2021
- Oberlin College's 'Professor of Peace urged elimination of Jewish state - The Jerusalem Post - March 3rd, 2021
- The President of Tunisia Slanders the Jews - besacenter.org - March 3rd, 2021
- Catering company accused of anti-Zionist posts back in court in April - Toronto Sun - March 3rd, 2021
- Facebook warned against making Zionism protected category 8min - PRESSTV - February 26th, 2021
- Revisiting the Jewish Question | New Voices - New Voices - February 26th, 2021
- At Zionist hero's memorial, Netanyahu invokes Purim to threaten Iran - Cleveland Jewish News - February 26th, 2021
- Action urged over Bristol academic who called to 'end Zionism as an ideology' - Jewish News - February 19th, 2021
- Anti-Semitism accusations used in attempt to prevent Ken Loach speaking at Oxford University - WSWS - February 19th, 2021
- Attack on the Synagogue in Spokane and the rise of Anti-Semitism - Bulletin - February 19th, 2021
- MPs tell Bristol it is giving 'green light to anti-Jewish incitement' - The Tab - February 19th, 2021
- Pressure mounts on Bristol Uni over academic accused of 'antisemitic tropes' - Jewish News - February 19th, 2021
- The Charedi Rabbi Who Changed His Mind On Zionism: An Interview With Rabbi Moshe Lichtman - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - February 19th, 2021
- I'm tired of waiting for my uni to act against conspiratorial hatred - Jewish News - February 19th, 2021
- LETTERS: Wise up, CA progressives; Hooray for Dr. Fauci; etc. - The Jewish News of Northern California - February 19th, 2021
- Canada should say no to racism at the United Nations - iPolitics.ca - February 19th, 2021
- IfNotNow smears IHRA definition as a 'threat' to progressivism - JNS.org - February 19th, 2021
- Facebook might censor criticism of Zionists. Thats dangerous - The Guardian - February 16th, 2021
- Lost letter on Zionism from Father of the Chinese Nation surfaces - The Jerusalem Post - February 16th, 2021
- California progressives get pushback on Zionism 'litmus test' J. - The Jewish News of Northern California - February 16th, 2021
- Why are Jewish groups fighting the IHRA antisemitism definition? -opinion - The Jerusalem Post - February 16th, 2021
- Why the success of Israel's strategy to silence critics is far from assured - Middle East Eye - February 16th, 2021
- Pro-Zionist letter by 'father of modern China' Sun Yat-Sen resurfaces in Israel - Cleveland Jewish News - February 16th, 2021
- Father of the Chinese nation supported Zionism | IJN - Intermountain Jewish News - February 16th, 2021
- Likud alliance with Religious Zionist party is unholy - editorial - The Jerusalem Post - February 16th, 2021
- Masorti Movement warns JNF move to buy West Bank land may endanger fund - The Times of Israel - February 16th, 2021
- Netanyahu: Kahanist wont be in my government - The Jerusalem Post - February 16th, 2021
- Reform threatens KKL-JNF with High Court petition over West Bank purchase - The Jerusalem Post - February 16th, 2021
- Activist Marc Lamont Hill Says Black Lives Matter Supports the 'Dismantling of the Zionist Project' - Algemeiner - February 16th, 2021
- Portugal hero of 1974 revolution shares antisemitic theories on Twitter - The Jerusalem Post - February 16th, 2021
- Iran may be more democratic than the U.S. nowadays - Tehran Times - February 16th, 2021
- The bad faith behind Zionist activists latest try to win the left - Forward - February 7th, 2021
- Bayit Yehudi is over - Does their public need a party anymore? - The Jerusalem Post - February 7th, 2021
- Israel and the Temple Mount's five Muslim rivals - JNS.org - February 7th, 2021
- Working With 28. Jun, A United Nations Consultant And Forbes Nonprofit Council Member - Severna Park Voice - February 6th, 2021
- The incredible life of David Carll and his five generations who've raised families on his property - KABC-TV - February 6th, 2021
- Civil Society and the Question of Palestine - NGO Action News 4 February 2021 - occupied Palestinian territory - ReliefWeb - February 6th, 2021
- Facebook is getting pulled into a fight about the politics of Israel - The Verge - February 6th, 2021
- The Threat of Linking Zionism with Christianity in Iraq - International Christian Concern - February 6th, 2021
- Facebook draws ire after employee says the site could police the term 'Zionists' - thejewishchronicle.net - February 6th, 2021
- Fatah: elections will be held in Jerusalem against the Zionist entity's will - Middle East Monitor - February 6th, 2021
- Farewell to Ezra Nawi, a Mizrahi Jew who refused to live by Zionism's rules - +972 Magazine - February 6th, 2021
- Far-right parties led by Smotrich and Ben Gvir, a Kahane disciple, join forces - The Times of Israel - February 6th, 2021
- Who raised $280 million at $1.4 billion valuation and is Zionist an offensive term? - CTech - February 6th, 2021
- Professor Pushing Conspiracy Theories at University of Leeds Has Got to Go - Jewish Journal - February 6th, 2021
- BDS Might Use 'Non-violent Means' Against Israel, But It Is 'Very Violent In Its Ends' - CBN News - February 6th, 2021
- 'Totalitarian' school renaming; Equating twerps with Nazis; Enjoy your plastic straws! J. - The Jewish News of Northern California - February 6th, 2021
- Club Z Summit Discusses Shifting the Zionist Narrative - Jewish Journal - January 26th, 2021
- Normalize this! | Susan M. George | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - January 26th, 2021
- With Biden, Israel has a true Zionist in the White House - Ynetnews - January 26th, 2021
- How the Israeli flag became a symbol for white nationalists - +972 Magazine - January 26th, 2021
- ASUCR tables bill aimed to have UCR adopt the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism - Highlander Newspaper - January 26th, 2021
- Banned Anti-Zionist Student Group at Fordham University Will Appeal Ruling to Highest Court in New York State - Algemeiner - January 26th, 2021
- Grapevine, January 24, 2021: What to expect in 2021 - The Jerusalem Post - January 26th, 2021
- UC Merced Professor Who Tweeted of 'IsraHell' and Zionist 'World Domination' Will Not Teach Spring Semester After Outcry - Algemeiner - January 26th, 2021
- Coming to terms with my year of Bashert - The Jerusalem Post - January 26th, 2021
- Here's a course in anti-Zionist musicology - Slipped Disc - January 18th, 2021
- US-Zionist axis trying to disintegrate Islamic nations - Mehr News Agency - English Version - January 18th, 2021
- The Battle Over Jewish Students and the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism - Algemeiner - January 18th, 2021
- Pompeo accused Iran to gain Zionists support in 2024 election - Mehr News Agency - English Version - January 18th, 2021
- Trump's parting gift to Israel - Middle East Monitor - January 18th, 2021
- This week in history: January 18-24 - WSWS - January 18th, 2021
- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Was A Zionist - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - January 18th, 2021
- Report: New bleak forecast says Israel could see large new COVID wave in March - The Times of Israel - January 18th, 2021
- A Conversation on A Critical Political Economy of the Middle East and North Africa (14 Jan) - Jadaliyya - January 18th, 2021
- Moroccan Islamist groups reject normalizing ties with Israel - Reuters - December 16th, 2020
- At US Jewish anti-Zionist group anti-Semitism panel, speakers say they love Jews - The Times of Israel - December 16th, 2020
- Opinion | The real lesson in the Roald Dahl apology? Anti-Zionists hate Jews. - Forward - December 16th, 2020
- The fulfilment of the Zionist vision - Australian Jewish News - December 16th, 2020
- Turkish media vows to take over Tel Aviv, calls opposition terrorists - The Jerusalem Post - December 16th, 2020
- Hanukkahs lesson about antisemitism on the Left - Forward - December 16th, 2020
- Equating Zionism With White Supremacy in the Age of Trump - The Jewish Voice - December 16th, 2020
- Doha, Muscat oppose tie normalization with Zionist Regime - Mehr News Agency - English Version - December 16th, 2020
- The People of Israel's Hanukkah Gift to themselves - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - December 16th, 2020
- Zionist regime has no place in future of region - Mehr News Agency - English Version - December 16th, 2020
Comments