Page 16«..10..15161718..3040..»

A review of Party policy on Zionism and Palestinian self-determination – Communist Party USA

Posted By on April 11, 2024

A recent article, Our position on Palestine cannot be formed unilaterally, explains that the Partys position on Palestinian self-determination is drawn from our fraternal parties. While this is certainly the case, there are gaps within the article which could be precarious in the current moment. In light of the ongoing genocide in Gaza, it is necessary for us as a Party to examine and elaborate on the development of our understanding of zionism and Palestinian self-determination. While our stances on international issues draw from the analyses of our fraternal parties, elevating and highlighting some key points in our own Partys approach throughout its history can be instructive for us to meet the political moment.

Important to emphasize is that the Party has opposed zionism since before the Nakba in 1948. Before the establishment of Israel, this position was made evident in the The Peoples Front, a book which, while controversial, can be looked at as a defining ideological text of the period of the late 1930s. In it, Earl Browder, then General Secretary of the CPUSA, made clear that the Party opposes zionism, arguing:

All Jewish workers who have been supporters, or have been influenced by, Zionism, and who have been hostile to the Communist Party because our Party opposed its political program, should really be prepared to do some hard and fundamental thinking about the latest British proposal for partition of Palestine, and to draw some serious lessons from the crisis in Zionism that it produced

Is it not clear that the British imperialists deliberately prepared for this debacle of Zionism by setting Jews against the Arabs, and by creating conditions that make friendly cooperation between the two people more difficult

Is it not clear that any program of a dispersed people, which looks to support of the British imperialists for realization inevitably becomes simply a tool in the hands of the imperialists?

Even prior, in 1935, the editors of New Masses in their preface to the article Brown Shirts in Zion by Robert Gessner, which highlights the fascist orientation of Zionist leaders like Vladimir Jabotinsky, argued that:

Zionism is a tool of British imperialism which needs Palestine for its own purposes; Zionism is dispossessing the Arab peasants and is conducting a colonization by conquest with the aid of British bayonets; No nation can solve its problems by emigrating to another country, even if Palestine were not so small and so thickly populated; Zionism draws away the attention of the Jewish masses from the problems of the countries where they live; Zionism separates them from the masses of other nationalities; as a chauvinist movement it is a breeding ground for fascism.

Beyond simply opposing zionism, the Party was clearly aware of the colonialist and fascist basis of its attitude toward Palestine over a decade before the Nakba happened. These are essential details in understanding the Partys position from the beginning.

Equally imperative to emphasize is that the Party has also long understood zionism as a fundamentally racist project. In 1975, William L. Patterson, longtime leader of the Communist Party, wrote an article titled Zionisms Actions Prove Zionisms Racism, in the Daily World. In it he explains that Racism is a doctrine, a philosophy of the worlds warmongers. It is a vicious incitement to genocidal tactics in all social relations. Following from this he explains that the conclusion that zionism is racism flows logically from the history of zionist relations with the Arab peoples of Palestine, the Oriental Jews and Black Jews. In further illustrating his argument, he notes that zionism, itself, is antisemitic and that zionist support for Rhodesia and South Africa not only highlights that the zionists treatment of the Palestinians is analogous in some respects to that of South Africas racist murder clique toward Blacks, but that this support reveals the racism at zionisms core. Additionally illustrative of zionisms racism is its imperialist orientation, by which zionism threatens the successful implementation of the African and Asian liberation movements, as well as world peace.

This particular component is an important insight into our Partys position on zionism. Our Partys opposition to zionism as a racist, colonial, and expansionist project is imperative in expressing our support for the Palestinian right to self-determination. It is following from this position that we form our understanding of the Nakba as an ongoing, fundamentally violent, settler-colonial process, the responsibility of which lies with the Israeli occupation and zionism. We see this continued process of slaughter and mass displacement continuing through the unfolding genocide in Gaza and must work to combat Israels continued assaults on the Palestinian people. Zionisms racism is also central to the question domestically, as we see a rise in the repression of Palestinians, Arabs, and Palestinian solidarity activists. We are experiencing a climate of increased anti-Palestinian, anti-Muslim, and anti-Arab propaganda pushed by zionist politicians and institutions. Understanding these points is indispensable in locating the root of the current violence against the Palestinian people.

Finally, the Partys present position of supporting a two-state solution, as is developed from the position of the Palestinian Peoples Party, also requires additional elaboration.

The CPUSA has long perceived the creation of two states as a tactical step to a more long-term solution for Palestinian liberation and the end of occupation and apartheid. Particularly relevant on this point is the work of Hyman Lumer, who in 1975 published The Palestinian Question and the Middle East Conflict in Political Affairs. In this piece he makes clear that the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state in the West Bank and the Gaza strip is no more than a first step toward the solution of the problem of self-determination. He elaborates:

Such a state, with its small, divided territory and meager economic resources, has serious problems of economic viability to cope with. Second, the establishment of such a state leaves unresolved the future of the rest of the Palestinian populationin the East Bank, in Lebanon, in Israel and elsewhere. And most important, it leaves the problem of refugees yet to be resolved on the basis of their right to return to their homes or receive compensation for their property. The process of self-determination would therefore have to continue beyond this initial step

Following from this, the Partys position was not that a two-state solution was a final end goal, but that it sought to support the change in the balance of forces that the establishment of two states could provide on the international arena. In doing so, the Party has hoped to see long-term de-zionization, as Hyman Lumer referred to it, leading to what Lumer outlined as a hopeful future based on ongoing negotiations and struggles: a unified Palestinian state as a binational state of voluntary union founded on the equality of the two peoples. While our Party, drawing from our fraternal organizations, recognizes the immediate demand for the establishing of a Palestinian state along 67 borders, it also has had a more far-reaching view of Palestinian liberation: de-zionization, an end to occupation, an end to the ongoing Nakba, and a future unified, democratic state of Jews and Palestinians living in equality.

Thus, the Partys position has not just been a cut and dry support for a two-state solution, but an understanding of the establishment of two states, with emphasis on the right of return and an end to the occupation, as a first step in pursuance of a longer, more just, and more sustainable resolution to the struggle for Palestinian freedom. Emphasizing these specific points is key in providing clarity and guiding us to action in this moment, to direct our work for a ceasefire, for ending U.S. aid to Israel, and for supporting Palestinian self-determination.

Images: Palestine solidarity protest, Berlin by Hossam el-Hamalawy (CC BY 2.0 Deed); We Cant Bomb Our Way To Peace by Diane Krauthamer (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Deed); End the Occupation by Becker1999 from Columbus, OH via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

Read more here:
A review of Party policy on Zionism and Palestinian self-determination - Communist Party USA

On Zion, Zionism, and Zionists: A Biblical History – Hannah Arendt Center

Posted By on April 11, 2024

04-07-2024

Roger Berkowitz

Jim Sleeper begins his long essay on the many forgotten historical and religious foundations of the shallow modern understanding of claims like zionism, settler colonialism, and antisemitism by quoting T.S. Eliot who writes, "Humankind cannot bear very much reality. Sleeper is seeking to offer manifold correctives and complexities to any and all simplified narratives of justification: justifications for Hamas October 7th atrocities and war crimes in the service of its stated genocidal aims; Israels vengeful response that has flaunted the laws of war in the name of wrathful collective punishment; the claims of American evangelicals who see Israel and the United States both as divinely sanctioned ethno-states; and Israeli apologists, and radical left-wing pro-Hamas ideologues. Sleepers basic point is that we cant understand the volcanic eruptions in both the Middle East and in the United States without facing up to the ancient religious passions that drive both American and Jewish history. He writes:

But larger eruptions of hatred and mayhem in Americas increasingly divided, uncivil society are driven not by antisemitism or by today's Jews, nor by the riptides of global capital and technology and the desperate migrations and belligerent nationalisms that they accelerate. More than most of us recognize, theyre driven by ancient religious passions that figured deeply in Israels and America's origins. Both nations professedly liberal and civic-republican cultures are profoundly and perhaps fatally conflicted, in ways that prompt not only news headlines but also biblically resonant upheavals, even when the participants dont consider themselves religious at all.

The 17th-century English Calvinists who colonized lands that they called New England and Virginia, and whose 18th-century legatees participated in founding the American republic, pursued strategies remarkably similar to those of todays Israeli settlers in the West Bank and today's military invaders of Gaza, some of whom claim a divine mandate and others a manifest destiny to impose one ethno-religious identity at the expense of longtime inhabitants.

The settler-colonial paradigm (or accusation) touted by today's American progressives in attacking Israel certainly fits the early American Puritans, who had no ancestral roots or claims on the lands they were settling and seizing. Yet their pivot backward toward ancient Israelites divinely promised Zion has infected Americas civic-republican culture in ways that still drive Protestants and Jews obsessions with Israel's presence in the Middle East.

That Jews, unlike Puritans, actually do have ancestors in their promised land was confirmed in 1947 by the discovery of scrolls transcribed in Hebrew and buried in caves near the Dead Sea seven centuries before Islam existed and before Arabic was spoken in the region. That complicates the settler-colonial paradigm, which applies readily to English Puritans but more ambiguously to Jews. Yet those passages also contain prophetic warnings that Israelites territorial claims were contingent on keeping the covenant sealed at Sinai or, as we might put it now, on transcending narrow tribalism to meet a higher, more universal standard. If they didnt, God would punish them at the hands of their enemies:

Woe to those who are at ease in Zion, and to those who feel secure on the mountain of Samaria, the notable men of the first of the nations, to whom the house of Israel comes! . Go down to Gath of the Philistines. Are you better than these kingdoms? Or is their territory greater than your territory, O you who put far away the day of disaster and bring near the seat of violence? Woe to those who lie on beds of ivory and stretch themselves out on their couches, who drink wine in bowls and anoint themselves with the finest oils, but are not grieved over the ruin of Joseph! [Amos 6]

The reluctant but overwhelmed prophet Isaiah reported that God would punish the Israelite elites arrogance by destroying their Zion "until the cities lie ruined and without inhabitant, until the houses are left deserted and the fields ruined and ravaged, until the Lord has sent everyone far away and the land is utterly forsaken."

There's no question that Hamas intentions toward Jews are genocidal and nihilistic, and that it's a despotic, destructive force for the Palestinians under its rule. That doesnt cancel out the historical reality that Winthrop, Mather and other English settlers who founded Harvard and our republic were as genocidal as the biblical Hebrews they self-consciously modeled themselves upon. Condemning only one sides bloodlust, or blaming American campus protesters for (allegedly) defending it, while ignoring the other sides equivalent nihilism serves neither justice nor a civic-republican ethos that began on this continent with Puritan efforts to balance personal autonomy with strong community. Such selective outrage can only intensify the pathologies of Nakba-traumatized Palestinians and Holocaust-traumatized Jews who play fast and loose with Americans grievances and hopes.

What Adam Shatz has called "vengeful pathologies" inflame not only those tied ancestrally or materially to one or another side in this war but also those with no such ties or interests who protest it more passionately than numerous more devastating conflicts in recent memory. Thousands of American young people didn't take to the campus quads to condemn the killing of approximately 100,000 civilians and more than a million combatants in the 1980s Iran-Iraq war. Very few seemed to lose sleep over the murder of tens of thousands of Chechens in Russia's counter-insurgency war of the 2000s, which Human Rights Watch called "unparalleled in the area since World War II for its scope and destructiveness."

These and other recent horrors are surely as hideous as the IDFs killing of more than 30,000 Gazans, including many women and children, and the destruction of their homes, schools and hospitals. We should also note the unmatched sadism of Hamas body-camera footage depicting the murder of 1,200 or so Israelis, most of them civilians, some of whom were forced to watch family members killed or brutalized before being slaughtered themselves. Campus organizations, churches, labor unions and social justice advocates who mobilized against Israel's retaliatory attacks have said very little about Hamas evident strategy of using thousands of Palestinian civilians as human shields.

Some explanations for this are plausible but not entirely convincing. One is that U.S. efforts on Israels behalf reflect the foreign policy establishments effort to manage largely unmanageable upheavals in the post-World War II order. Another is that globalized communications, commerce and finance have enabled a new regime of profiteering and power-grabbing by an array of bad actors: social media managers, demagogues, propagandists and lobbyists for authoritarian regimes. Those developments have undermined the promise of democracy that seemed to emerge during the Arab Spring rebellions of 2011. Authoritarians have adapted the new technologies to serve what William J. Dobson calls The Dictators Learning Curve. A more plausible but still inadequate answer contends that young Americans protesting the Gaza war are indulging a form of politics that privileges their zeal to find themselves in moralistic posturing and ideological positioning. This concern for the Palestinians is not a matter of anti-Semitism so much as it is a reflection of self-absorption, Shatz wrote in The Nation in 2014. "Palestinians are for the radical Western left what Algerians were for Third Worldists: natural-born resisters, fighting not only Israel but its imperial patrons. Palestine is still the question because it holds up a mirror to us. Too many people want to save Palestine one activist said to me. But it could just as well be said that too many people want to be saved by Palestine.

An all-consuming preoccupation with America and Israel, Shatz continued, has left some progressives strangely incurious about the crimes for which the West cant be blamed and the developments, such as the politicization of sectarian identity, that are shaking the region far more profoundly than the Israeli-Palestinian arena. Why arent progressives who champion freedom of speech, conscience, sexual identity and reproductive choice chanting, From Tehran to Tripoli, Muslims will be free?

My criticism of the left is not meant to excuse the Zionist movement and Israel's degrading treatment of Palestinians since at least the 1930s, when leaders such as Zeev Jabotinsky were unapologetically racist, or since 1967, when Israel conquered and occupied Gaza and the West Bank. But I also cannot condemn Israel uniquely, when it is invoked by Americans whose ancestors destroyed Indigenous peoples and enslaved millions of Africans. "Forgetfulness, and I would even say historical error, are essential in the creation of a nation, noted Ernst Renan, the 19th-century scholar of Semitic languages and civilizations. Equally essential, it would seem, are demagogic leaders who safeguard their own nations' false memories by ginning up moralistic condemnations of other peoples vengeful pathologies.

See more here:
On Zion, Zionism, and Zionists: A Biblical History - Hannah Arendt Center

Take a Gap Year to Israel Now? Convince me! – The Times of Israel

Posted By on April 11, 2024

There are great reasons to consider taking a gap year to Israel right now. Consider these as you and your teen contemplate how to spend your time this coming Fall.

The Zionism argument

Being a Zionist right now in North America is hard. Whether you have been firmly committed in your Zionism or are looking to understand more about what it means to have a strong relationship with Israel, a gap year in Israel will take you out of your social media echo chambers and bring Israel IRL (into real life) from 2-D to 3-D, particularly through your encounters, mifgashim, with Israelis. Being a Zionist isnt a spectator event and before one can become an activist of any political shade or color, spending a significant amount of time in Israel is not just advisable but crucial to being a part of the Zionist story.Nothing else even comes close to true solidarity than living as a local, and immersing oneself in Israeli culture, politics, and society. A gap year in Israel is an all-encompassing experience that engages all sense and mental faculties.

Historically, there were different types of Zionism, but today it seems that, at least in North America, Zionism has been painted with one broad brush stroke. But take a look at how Israelis are expressing their Zionism today, and you will see and how multivocal it is. On Young Judaeas Year Course, you will experience two commitments to Zionism. One is big tent Zionism, which blends our commitment to pluralism and diversity with Zionism. We welcome different expressions of Zionism and create a community by learning through one another, and from our experiences in Israel. Each participant leaves the gap year having deepened their own personal connection to Israel.

The other approach is aspirational Zionism, the belief that together we can build tomorrows Israel. Theodore Herzl once said, If you will it, it is no dream and I would say the inverse is true as well, if you dont will it, it will only be a dream. While it is so much easier to disengage, Zionism calls us to roll up our sleeves and get involved in helping Israel become the place we want it to be. This aspirational Zionism is manifested by spending the year in Israel, studying, volunteering, connecting with Israelis, and making your voices heard.

The deepen your Jewish pride argument

Whether you are from a small rural town or a large urban city, these past few months, no one has been immune to the growing antisemitic sentiments. While this has led to a swell of Jewish pride for some, many more are hiding their visibly Jewish symbols concerned about the comments or actions that they may confront if they are discovered. If you are one of the only Jews in your town or your school, spending time in Israel will be a welcome change. You will discover the magic of being in a place where you are immersed in Jewish culture, religion, and Hebrew, and you arent constantly on the defensive. If you are coming from a big city, meeting Jews on Year Course from across North America and Europe will certainly broaden your perspective about what life outside of the big city bubble can be like for Jews and what you take for granted on a daily basis. Further, being a part of Young Judaeas Year Course, you will meet Jews with varied backgrounds and beliefs. You can comfortably carry on the traditions you grew up with or choose to try on new ones. Throughout the year you will gain ownership of your Jewish identity as an individual and as part of a collective community. But most important, spending the year in this positive and joyful Jewish community, you will deepen your sense of Jewish pride carrying that into the rest of your life.

The ready-set-defend preparing for Israel on college campus argument

When did it happen that 18-year-olds were expected to be expert ambassadors and defenders of Israel? A On a growing number of college campuses, the tone and tenor for Jewish students is increasingly becoming unwelcoming and hostile. You dont even have to be vocalize your connection to Israel, just being Jewish puts students on the spot to engage on Israel related events. Even students who are deeply committed and have been active in social justice and progressive spaces, now find themselves uninvited and on the defense. Spending a year immersed in a gap year program can give you the opportunity and exposure necessary to make your own, informed decisions before taking on the wider discourse. Young Judaeas approach is not one of advocacy, hasbarah, rather we encourage the deep exploration of questions through critical inquiry and exposure to diverse perspectives. Being on a Young Judaea gap year, part of a community of diverse young adults, you will spend meaningful time learning how to engage with people who think differently than you do. You will also learn to ask deep questions and how to listen rather than simply spew factoids. In addition, you will also spend time learning the history of how we got to this moment, and the ideologies that might inspire you to shape how we get to the next moment.

The I am not ready for college yet argument

The last few years have been really hard on teens. Between Covid quarantines, virtual high school, and a rapidly changing world, many teens are simply not ready for college. And there is NO SHAME in that. You are not alone. Participants of gap year programs say that a year abroad led to deep personal growth and transformation. From learning basic life and executive function skills like time management, to the responsibilities of living in a communal setting (laundry, cooking, cleaning). These are but a few areas of practical maturation that will lead to greater independence. In addition, participants will practice social skills necessary for living in community and spend time with inspirational mentors and teachers who will gently guide participants into deep personal reflection and growth. Parents and teens say that this one year of growth sets them up for college and life beyond high school in measurable ways.

The make friends for life argument

The nature of an immersive gap year program is that you spend intensive time with a like-minded group of people building shared experiences and lifelong bonds. Alumni of our gap year programs tell us that their closest friends to date are those they met on Year Course. These friends become your trusted circle, the group of friends that gets you, that you can be vulnerable and real with. During this particularly challenging year, since October 7th, we have heard numerous stories of Year Course alumni turning to their Year Course community for support and safe and honest conversation. And that is so important, particularly now. Years later, we hear of Year Course friends staying connected, roommates in college or in a first apartment, networking for jobs, sharing important life cycles, and in some cases, Year Course couples who found their life partners on their gap year. We cant promise that for everyone but friends for life we all but guarantee!

But back to our central question and naming the elephant in the room. You want me to commit to going on a gap year in the middle of a war? It is true that we are living through a historic moment in Israels history, with no clear path to what the future holds. Still, wouldnt you rather be part of shaping history than observing from the sidelines? And what about safety and security? At Young Judaea we take this very seriously. We have been operating gap year and other Israel travel programs for over 70 years, through peaceful times and during wars. We are prepared to make the necessary adjustments to ensure the safety and security of our participants and the quality of the experience. Of course, this is a very personal and individual decision for each family, but hundreds of teens have made this decision before you. Just ask them, they are sure to add their own argument for why you should seriously consider a gap year to Israel this coming year.

So, what are you waiting for?

Adina H. Frydman is the CEO of Young Judaea Global. Having spent 12 years at UJA-Federation of New York, first spearheading the synagogue department, SYNERGY and then as executive director of Community Resources, Adina focused on strengthening the NY Jewish community and its organizations through Talent Development, Synagogue and Day School Initiatives, Community Volunteerism, and Crisis Mobilization. In addition, she contributed to thought leadership in the area of synagogue change by producing leading research in areas such as Voluntary Dues, Data Driven Decision Making, Synagogue Engagement of Young Adults, Russian Speaking Jews, and Empty Nesters, as well as developing key attributes for a thriving synagogue. Before coming to New York in 2008, Adina was the Director of Focus Israel at the St. Louis Jewish Federation, where she worked to foster engagement between synagogues and Israel. In addition, Adina received a Bachelor of Music from Stetson University and Cantorial Investiture from Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute for Religion. Adina founded the music program at the Brandeis Institute for Music and Art (BIMA), directed several choirs through HaZamir: The International Jewish Teen Choir. Adina is the proud mother of four children.

Original post:
Take a Gap Year to Israel Now? Convince me! - The Times of Israel

‘This is Zionism’ campaign seeks to ‘instill confidence’ in students – JNS.org

Posted By on April 11, 2024

(April 10, 2024 / JNS)

A new effort from a watchdog group aims to strengthen and motivate student activists combating antisemitism on the front lines of American academia.

CAMERA on Campus announced its new This is Zionism initiative on April 9.

Our campaign seeks to instill confidence in Zionist students worldwide during a period of rampant campus antisemitism. Empowering students through education is the cornerstone of our campaign, emphasized Douglas Sandoval, managing director for CAMERA on Campus, to JNS.

Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace have fueled antisemitic attacks against Zionist students through their doubling down on the false and ludicrous equation of Zionism to something harmful and nefarious, said Sasha Chernyak, content and campaigns manager for CAMERA on Campus.

She said the new website (www.zionism.me) would provide students with the facts about Zionism and Israel, enabling them to tackle head-on the most common attacks we see on Zionism.

Chernyak noted that following Oct. 7, students are facing an uphill battle with hate groups like SJP and JVP attempting to vilify and intimidate Zionist students like never before.

The campaign strengthens Zionist students worldwide with a simple, yet important message: you are not alone and the facts are on your side, Sandoval told JNS.

You have read 3 articles this month.

Register to receive full access to JNS.

Read more from the original source:
'This is Zionism' campaign seeks to 'instill confidence' in students - JNS.org

Jewish Anti-Zionist Artists Withdraw From Contemporary Jewish Museum Show – Hyperallergic

Posted By on April 11, 2024

A group of anti-Zionist Jewish artists is withdrawing artwork they submitted for the forthcoming California Jewish Open at the Contemporary Jewish Museum (CJM) in San Francisco, citing the institutions inability to meet artists demands, including transparency around funding and a commitment to BDS [Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions]. In a statement on Thursday, April 4, California Jewish Artists for Palestine added that the CJM has been a target of the BDS Movement for having received funding directly from the State of Israel as well as private zionist philanthropists.

The statement was signed by 11 artists, including seven whose work had originally been accepted into the exhibition and four whose work had not: Micah Bazant, Liat Berdugo, Jules Cowan, Rebekah Erev, Rebecca Maria Goldschmidt, Steph Kudisch, Kate Laster, Ava Sayaka Rosen, Sophia Sobko, Arielle Tonkin, and Irina Zadov.

The California Jewish Open is an open-call exhibition featuring 47 Jewish-identifying artists living in the state and organized around the prompt of how Jewish culture, identity, and community [can] foster, reimagine, hold, or discover connection. In a press release on Thursday, the museum acknowledged the artists who withdrew from the show and said the space on the walls where their artwork was to hang would be left blank, in a gesture to both honor the perspective that would have been shared through these works, and to authentically reflect the struggle for dialogue that is illustrated by the artists decisions to withdraw.

While several artworks referencing Free Palestine were accepted into the exhibition,the artists were told bySenior Curator Heidi Rabben in a March 22 email thattheir work would be presented in proximity to artwork(s) by other Jewish artists which may convey views and beliefs that conflict with [their] own, leaving open the possibility of curatorial both sides-ism.

The group also expressed concern over a stipulation preventing them from modifying or removing their artwork, a condition they think may be linked to a recent incident in which artists altered their work with messages of Palestinian solidarity in the Bay Area Now 9 triennial at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts.

The group demanded the ability to modify or remove their works and control over curatorial framing of their pieces, as well as transparency in funding and a full divestment from Israeli governmental and pro-Zionist foundation funding.

Among these funders is the Helen Diller Family Foundation, which has been criticized in the past for its grants to Canary Mission, a group accused of doxxing anti-Zionist students, and to the American Freedom Defense Initiative, which was labeled an anti-Muslim extremist group by the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2022.

In response to Hyperallergics request for comment, CJM Executive Director Kerry King said that the Contemporary Jewish Museum had a transparent dialogue with this group of artists, but ultimately was not able to meet all of the conditions outlined. She added that the contract was typical and that its terms predated the protest at Yerba Buena, and that funding sources are publicly listed for each exhibition. (The artists, however, noted several anonymous donors in the highest donation brackets.)

We cannot tie an artists decision to participate to potential funding to support the exhibition and programming that may be secured closer to the opening, King told Hyperallergic. In response to the artists condition that their wall text could appear as they proposed unedited, she told the artists that she wanted to be transparent about what the museum could and could not do.

The CJM was not putting forth that anti-Zionism was antisemitism, but was requesting to work with the artists to jointly develop language that would clearly articulate their intention in a way that was clear and legible to the Museums many audiences, she continued.

Regarding divestment from Israeli governmental funding, the museum told the artists that this condition cannot be met. A spokesperson told Hyperallergic thatthe Consulate General of Israel to the Pacific Northwest has provided small amounts of funding for exhibitions and talks, adding that the CJM has not received any funding from the Consulate General or any Israeli organizations since 2021.

It is our connection to Jewishness: activism, diaspora, and the spirit of adaptation that brings us here, wrote one of the artists, Kate Laster, in the group letter.

As Jews, we refuse to allow any justification, any weaponization of our generational trauma, or to give our consent to normalize apartheid, Laster continued. There is power in refusal its a form of honoring rebellion and imagining what cultural arts ecosystems could be like beyond Zionism.

Editors Note, 4/8/2024, 1:23pm:An earlier version of this article misstated that information shared with the artists over email was included in their contract. This has been corrected.

Read more:
Jewish Anti-Zionist Artists Withdraw From Contemporary Jewish Museum Show - Hyperallergic

Mehring Yaynclk publishes Turkish edition of The Logic of Zionism: From Nationalist Myth to the Gaza Genocide … – WSWS

Posted By on April 11, 2024

Mehring Yaynclk is pleased to announce the publication of the Turkish edition of The Logic of Zionism: From Nationalist Myth to the Gaza Genocide by David North. We encourage all readers of the World Socialist Web Site in Turkey to buy the book, available here.

The volume features four lectures given by David North in response to Israels NATO-backed genocide in Gaza. North is the chairperson of both the Socialist Equality Party in the United States and the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site. He has played a leading role in the international socialist movement for more than a half century.

Norths first lecture, delivered at the University of Michigan on October 24, 2023, placed the Israeli onslaught against Gaza in the context of the Zionist oppression of the Palestinian people.

The second lecture, given at Birkbeck, University of London on November 18, 2023, reviewed the history, dating back to the 19th century, of socialist opposition to Zionist politics and ideology.

In the third lecture, presented at Berlins Humboldt University on December 14, 2023, North subjected the claim of the German government that opposition to Zionism is antisemitism to withering criticism.

In the fourth lecture, delivered at the University of Michigan on March 12, 2024, North draws the political lessons of US Air Force member Aaron Bushnells self-immolation in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., chanting Free Palestine.

North concluded his lecture:

We are confronted with great political questions and challenges. They can be solved. But to solve them, we must build a revolutionary party. This party must win the allegiance of the great masses of the working class. Thats the basic, fundamental lesson we must draw from the death of Aaron Bushnell and from a comprehension of the crisis of our times.

Professor of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego, Charles Thorpe wrote of an earlier edition of the book:

David Norths three lectures, delivered amidst the war, are a remarkably concise, historically informed, and politically devastating indictment of Zionism and the Israeli assault on Gaza.

The Logic of Zionism also includes the presentation made of the Turkish edition of Norths book Leon Trotsky and the Struggle for Socialism in the Twenty First Century at the Istanbul Book Fair on November 5, 2023.

Join the fight for socialism

More here:
Mehring Yaynclk publishes Turkish edition of The Logic of Zionism: From Nationalist Myth to the Gaza Genocide ... - WSWS

Mending Wounded Soldiers’ Bodies & Spirits at Hadassah’s Gandel Rehab Center – The Times of Israel

Posted By on April 11, 2024

Ive been on a long ride with Hadassah. I joined about 40 years ago because a friend became chapter president where we lived, in Delmar, NY. I was strictly supporting a personal friend, with no pressure to become active. Who could have imagined that when I moved to Massachusetts, Id wind up as chapter president with about 40 friends on the board? Times change and our chapters energy has migrated with the snowbirds to Florida. But my volunteer commitment has lasted through a Hadassah region presidency and various national portfolios.

One of my current assignments is to serve as a Hadassah delegate to the Vaad haPoel, aka World Zionist Organization, in Jerusalem. While attending this years conference, I was fortunate enough to tour the Hadassah Medical Organizations new Gandel Rehabilitation Center on the campus of Hadassah Hospital Mount Scopus.

As a former occupational therapist, I had some preconceived ideas about what I might see. I had worked on both psychiatric and medical wards with burn patients, hand patients and neuro-impaired patients. But that was in the Stone Age. The state-of-the-art facility at Hadassah we toured was light years beyond my expectations. Todays equipment auto-adjusts to a patients therapeutic challenges. Wall consoles give immediate feedback so that patients can monitor their own progress.

When Hamas attacked Israel on October 7th, the Gandel Centers opening was accelerated so that Hadassah could offer rehabilitation care to as many wounded soldiers as possible. The soldiers were the first patients to be brought in on January 15th.

The Center offers a host of special treatments along with physical, occupational and respiratory therapy as well as hydrotherapy and orthopedic rehabilitation. There is a post-traumatic stress disorder center and rehabilitation for neurological problems caused by brain, spinal cord and nervous system injuries. Since the Hamas invasion, both hospital staff and patients have accessed the centers psychological and social services.

Therapy is not a respite. Our highly motivated soldier-patients work hard to regain strength and function. My tour group was fortunate to meet a member of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), an extraordinary hero, who served as a battalion tank commander at the onset of the Hamas-Israel war. His group of 15 armored tanks secured the border between Israel and Gaza.

In Israel, commanders lead from the front and can be targeted. Unfortunately, he was. Early in the war, this brave soldier was shot and his arm and forearm were shattered. The bones have been replaced with rods. He is grateful to be at the Gandel Center, where he has spent weeks working to regain full range of motion and strength in his shoulder, elbow and hand, which the injury severely compromised. From what I could tell, he has a long way to go.

When construction is complete, the 323,000-square-foot, eight-story Gandel Center will care for 10,000 patients annually, with 140 in-patient beds and an out-patient clinic that can serve 250 patients daily. Among the state-of-the-art advances the Gandel Center will offer are walking labs (called gait labs), which use computers to analyze motion and detect problems not always apparent in clinical exams, and a therapeutic swimming pool with a modular floor that adapts to each patients requirements.

Little did I realize that when Hadassahs founder, Henrietta Szold, spoke about the healing of the daughter of my People over 100 years ago, she was talking to me. I am grateful that my unexpected connection to Hadassah is helping to give the wonderful soldier we met, and other IDF heroes like him, the best chance possible to return to full functioning and to lead meaningful lives.

Photo courtesy of Hadassah.

Sue Polansky serves as Vice Chair of Zionist Affairs in Hadassahs Education & Advocacy Division member and a member of the Hadassah Writers' Circle. Sue is also a Youth Aliyah Team Member and a Hadassah delegate to the American Zionist Movement. She has previously ghostwritten the ZionismDid You Know puzzle for Hadassah Magazine. She served as president of Hadassah Western New England, headed Hadassahs delegation to the 2017 and 2019 Vaad haPoel (JAFI & World Zionist Organization meetings), was a Hadassah delegate to the 2020 World Zionist Congress and to the 2024 WZO meeting in Jerusalem in 2024. She represented Hadassah at the Jewish Council of Public Affairs and co-taught a syllabus from the Hartman iEngage Program: Jewish Values & the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in her community and later taught the series for Hadassah Northeast. During the Covid19 pandemic, she facilitated a Beit HaAm Zionist video series for Hadassah Southern New England. She continues to serve on the National Youth Aliyah Committee and as Zionist Affairs VP of Hadassah Southern New England. In her home community, Sue has served as a vice president of Heritage Academy, chair of the Florence Melton Adult Mini-School Committee, served on the Board of Jewish Geriatric Services, and on several committees at the Harold Grinspoon Foundation. Her involvement at the Jewish Federation of Western Massachusetts has included serving as vice president on the Executive Committee, chair of its Education Committee, president of the Womens Division, a member of the Strategic Planning Committee, Nominating Committee, and Executive Director Search Committee. Sue has chaired the Federations Planning and Allocations Committee, Partnership 2000, the Israel@60 Mission, and the Jewish Endowment Foundations Distribution Committee. She was honored by the Federation at its Rose Luncheon in 2013, and at its 13 Extraordinary Women event. She received the Unsung Hero Award from the Harold Grinspoon Foundation for her many contributions to the Jewish community. Sue, who resides in Longmeadow, MA, is also a 2017 Israel Bonds awardee.

Visit link:
Mending Wounded Soldiers' Bodies & Spirits at Hadassah's Gandel Rehab Center - The Times of Israel

Nathan Straus: Shtadlan Extraordinaire, Zionist, And The ‘American Pasteur’ – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Posted By on April 11, 2024

Rare postcard, Hanadiv [philanthropist] Natan Straus. Nathan Straus (1848-1931) was a Jewish philanthropist and social activist who co-owned two of New York Citys largest department stores, R.H. Macy & Company and Abraham & Straus, but, as we shall see, he was much more than a successful American businessman.

The Zionist Organization of America dedicated the February 1, 1928, issue of its official organ, The New Palestine, to Straus on his eightieth birthday. One writer noted:

The name of Nathan Straus will be linked with that of Louis Pasteur through the centuries. A great many achievements in the field of public health and social welfare will be forgotten in the next few decades, but I make bold to say that the contribution made by Nathan Straus to the prolongation of life of all of his fellow, without regard to creed or race, especially in making commercial pasteurization practicable, will endure as an historical event of signal importance.

Another writer, the chairman of the Child Welfare League of America, wrote:

for generations to come the heart and soul of Nathan Straus will go marching on through thousands of children that he has saved for mankind children who would have died but for his persistent battle [on] their behalf.

History has proven them wrong. While Straus remains best known for building Macys into the largest department store in the world, his far more important contribution to saving the lives of millions of children has been sadly forgotten.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Straus, who was particularly sensitive to the issue of child mortality because of the deaths of two of his own children (including his two-year-old daughter, who died aboard ship during a European trip), became obsessed with taking action to reduce the high mortality of infants and children. Although pasteurization the process by which milk is heated and quickly cooled to rid it of germs had been discovered by Louis Pasteur in 1865, the process had not become standard in the food industry, and Straus became convinced that the infant mortality problem was due, in large part, to what he came to characterize as the white peril: the consumption of unsanitary raw milk. He arrived at this conclusion when, shocked by the sudden death of a healthy cow on his farm, he ordered an autopsy that showed that the animal had died of tuberculosis.

Worrying about the risk that the cow may have transmitted the disease to his family, he made certain that his children drank only pasteurized milk but, always dedicated to promoting the greater public good, he determined that protecting his family was not enough. Deciding that Pasteurs work presented the best way to combat infant mortality and tuberculosis, he privately funded the Nathan Straus Pasteurized Milk Laboratory (1892) to provide pasteurized milk to children.

In 1893, and at his own expense, Straus opened the first of 18 milk distribution depots throughout New York City, which sold his sterilized milk for only a few cents and made free milk available to those unable to afford even that. That year, he dispensed 34,400 bottles of milk from one depot and, by 1896, his efforts expanded to seventeen milk stations that distributed 3,142,252 bottles and 1,078,405 glasses of pasteurized milk. He also used his milk stations to sell coal at the very low price of five cents for 25 pounds to those who could pay, and for free to those who could not; he distributed more than 1.5 million buckets of coal and obtained city permission to use its piers for his coal depots.

Believing that ensuring the safety of milk was ultimately a governmental responsibility, Straus undertook a single-minded campaign describing the dangers of raw milk not only to urge Americans to action but also overseas, where he built pasteurization plants in Europe and the Middle East to demonstrate the technique to foreign governments. However, many dairymen, farmers and commercial milk distributors were disinclined to assume the expense of pasteurization, and Strauss campaign was also resisted by many doctors and scientists who were skeptical of these unscientific ideas and opposed what they characterized as government-mandated social experiments.

Straus, who had become president of the NYC Board of Health, was broadly vilified by bureaucrats and politicians to the point that he was arrested in 1897 and brought before the Manhattan Court of Special Sessions and convicted of serving adulterated milk at the Hebrew Institute Roof Garden on East Broadway. (He received a suspended sentence.)

Straus was relentless in spreading the milk pasteurization message, testifying before state legislatures and Congress; speaking at medical, social, and other conferences; and generating a steady stream of correspondence to the press and municipal health officers. Through his singular efforts, he ultimately prevailed when statistics established beyond doubt that infant mortality rates in the areas around his milk depots had dropped precipitously.

Chicago became the first city to enact a pasteurization law (1908), and many cities followed suit. It took a typhoid epidemic to finally convince New York City to mandate pasteurization in 1914. In 1920, when Straus had 297 milk stations distributed through 36 cities, he donated his New York pasteurization plant to the city and turned his milk depots over to public agencies. In short order, Congress enacted national milk health regulations and, according to a Treasury Department report, the general death rate of children under five was quickly halved due to the pasteurization of milk.

Straus launched another major health initiative when, concluding that the inception of many cases of tuberculosis in adults had its roots in childhood exposure to the disease, he determined that children could be protected from the ravages of tuberculosis by removing them from their homes and caring for them in a healthful environment. Accordingly, he developed the idea of a preventative, rather than a remedial, sanitarium for children, and he housed his preventorium in The Little White House, a cottage in Lakewood Township, New Jersey (1909), which went on to become the model for similar institutions throughout the world. In 1912, President Taft appointed him to serve as a delegate to the Tuberculosis Congress in Rome, and the first international Child Welfare Congress held under the auspices of the League of Nations in 1925 put on record its praise for his pioneer life-saving work.

Nathans great-grandfather, Jacob Lazar Straus, was an important Jewish leader who was a leading member of the Sanhedrin convened by Napoleon in 1806. The great Straus rags-to-riches story begins in 1848, when Nathan was born to a Jewish German family in Otterberg. He immigrated with his family (which included his brothers Isador and Oscar Straus, both famous in their own right) and settled in Georgia in 1854, where they worked as itinerant peddlers of general merchandise on Georgia plantations before their father, Lazarus, opened a dry goods store. While attending a local Baptist Bible School for two years, Nathan received Jewish religious instruction from his father, a Hebraist who loved the traditions of Jewish life.

When the family lost everything during the Civil War, its wealth in cotton burned and its savings wiped out, the family moved to New York City, where Lazarus formed L. Straus & Sons, a crockery and glassware firm. Nathan and his brothers began by selling crockery in the basement of Rowland H. Macys department store on 14th Street, but they moved on to become Macys partners in 1888 and co-owners and managing directors in 1896. In 1893, he and Isidor had purchased Joseph Wechslers interest in the Abraham and Wechsler dry-goods store in Brooklyn, which they renamed Abraham and Straus.

Straus was among the first to care about his workers and to champion workers rights. When it came to his attention that one of his saleswomen had fainted from starvation because she was saving her wages to feed her family, he established what may have been the first subsidized company cafeteria and installed bathrooms and medical facilities on site for his workers.

A proud Jew, Straus was fiercely loyal to the Jewish people, and the strong Jewish traditionalism of his fathers home and his wifes deep Jewish feelings were important religious influences in his life. Though raised in a community where his family were the only Jews, he became a synagogue Jew by choice, becoming affiliated with Reform Judaism when he moved to New York. In his later years, however, he came to believe that Reform Judaism had rejected too much of what was necessary for the survival of Judaism; speaking at a convention of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America a few years before his death, he unequivocally declared that the Reform movement was failing to hold on to the younger generation and that the future of Judaism was in Orthodoxy.

Straus was a staunch defender of Jewish interests in America and the world, and he became a shtadlan of note. He stated that he fought antisemitism because the Jews have a work to do in the world not merely in fighting for toleration of their own race, but in defending the cause of religious freedom throughout the world.

The stories are legion. For example, when some members of the Straus family were refused admission to a Lakewood hotel because they were Jews, he purchased adjacent land and built the Lakewood Hotel, open to all, which he operated at a great loss. (One famous couple who pointedly made a statement against restricting Jews by being guests at the hotel were his close friends President and Mrs. Cleveland.) When Henry Fords campaign against Jews was at its height, Straus publicly challenged Ford to submit the fictional and horrendous Protocols of the Elders of Zion to an impartial jury before whom he would refute them. The publicity given to this challenge by the best-loved and most trusted Jew of the land drew nationwide attention which, many historians believe, played an important role in Fords recantation.

When Ignacy Paderewski denied that there had been any anti-Jewish pogroms during his term as Polish prime minister, Straus, as chairman of the Committee for the Defense of the Jews in Poland, publicly challenged him through extensive evidentiary documentation and citations. Shortly after World War I, Straus traveled to lay a wreath at the Confederate Vance Monument in Asheville, North Carolina, as a debt of gratitude to U.S. senator and North Carolina governor Zebulon Baird Vance, a staunch defender of Jews and an outspoken critic of antisemitism who lauded Jews as wondrous kinsmen and our spiritual fathers. (In the wake of the George Floyd leftist violence and insurrection in 2021, the Ashville City Council voted to remove the citys Vance memorial.)

Straus was an active supporter of movements and organizations dedicated to the defense of Jews and Jewish rights, including serving as chairman of the first American Jewish Congress (1916 and 1920) and later as its president (1922), and served as honorary chairman of the New York United Jewish Appeal. An enthusiastic advocate for the physical development of young Jews, he was also a strong supporter of Young Judea and of Jewish sports meets arranged by other such organizations.

It was in 1904 while on a Mediterranean tour that Nathan and his wife, Lina, first visited Eretz Yisrael, a visit that, despite its discomforts for tourists, spiritually moved them to the point that they decided to remain in Jerusalem rather than travel on to Damascus, as per their planned itinerary. As Nathan wrote:

On reaching Jerusalem, we changed our plans. All that we saw in the Holy Land made such a deep impression on us that we gave up the idea of going to other places. Visiting the holy sights of which one hears and reads since childhood, watching the scenes in life as pictured in the Bible, was most soul-stirring. From that time on we felt a strange and intense desire to return to the land.

In 1912, Nathan and Lina joined his brother Isidor and his wife, Ida, on a trip through Europe, during which Nathan, excited by the prospect of another visit to Eretz Yisrael, suggested that the two couples take a side trip there. During that trip, Straus worked to raise the economic standards of Jews in Eretz Yisrael by, among other things, opening a soup kitchen in the Old City to dispense free meals to the destitute; building health bureaus to fight malaria and trachoma and ministering to its victims; establishing a domestic science school for girls; and founding and financing a factory for making buttons and souvenirs. He also laid the foundation of the work for public health in Eretz Yisrael with which his name would later become prominently associated by founding a Health Department to help people suffering from malaria, trachoma, and other sanitation-related ailments that were being largely neglected in the Holy Land.

Perhaps considering aliyah, he purchased land outside of Bethlehem opposite Kever Rachel and another piece of land which is now the center of Talpiot, a Jewish Jerusalem suburb which he planned as either the site of the Hebrew University or a personal home in Jerusalem.

Nathan became overwhelmed by the experience of being in the Promised Land and, in particular, with his work helping the needy Jewish communities there, but Isidor quickly decided hed had enough: How many camels, hovels, and yeshivas can you see? Its time to go. Nathan, however, was not ready to leave his beloved Eretz Yisrael, so Isidor and Ida returned alone to London, where Isidor booked passage for all four to sail back to America. As departure time drew near, Isidor sent an emergency cable to his brother advising that if he and Lina did not get to England they would, quite literally, miss the boat. Nathan again delayed because he felt he had so much more work to do on behalf of Jews in Eretz Yisrael and, by the time he and Lina reached London on April 10, the ocean liner had already left Southampton with Isidor and Ida aboard.

That liner was the Titanic.

Nathan saw his close call as a heavenly message, and the knowledge that hed escaped almost certain death because of his dedication to Eretz Yisrael would preoccupy him to the end of his days. He announced, Others may be better able than I to talk about Zionism, but none can feel it more deeply than I, and he demonstrated the truth of that statement every day for the rest of his life. He withdrew from most of his business activities and dedicated the last 15 years of his life to supporting and advocating for Eretz Yisrael. Beginning with his return to the land in 1913, Nathan gave more than two-thirds of his vast fortune to Jewish institutions and individuals there, with his known gifts to the Zionist cause exceeding $2 million.

With Hadassah only recently being founded by Henrietta Szold and lacking funds for many of its planned activities, he brought two Hadassah nurses with him to Eretz Yisrael and settled them in Jerusalem, thereby launching Hadassahs pioneering presence in the Land of Israel. He also established a Pasteur Institute in Eretz Yisrael which, together with his Health Department, played an important part in controlling epidemics during World War I.

He provided material support to the farmers and colonists in Eretz Yisrael and, in one famous case, he was thrilled to settle Abraham Krotoshinsky, the World War I hero of the Lost Battalion, as a farmer on the soil of Eretz Yisrael. In 1916, he sold his beloved steam yacht to obtain funds for the aid of war orphans in Eretz Yisrael; supported the nascent Hebrew University in Jerusalem; and helped to found the American Jewish Congress. In 1917, he launched the Jewish War Relief Fund with the single largest financial contribution of its kind given by an individual up to that time; he initially tried to sell his classic home on West 72nd Street to underwrite the Fund but, unable to find a buyer, he liquidated part of his investment portfolio at a great personal loss to generate the capital for the Jewish War Relief Fund.

When the problem of a Jewish Eretz Yisrael became more immediate after the British conquest of the land, Straus rose to the occasion. It is almost impossible to detail his incredible largesse to the Zionist cause, but suffice it to say that he led and responded to every Palestine appeal, beginning with his supplying half of the cargo of $100,000 worth of provisions (over $3 million in todays dollars) sent from America to Eretz Yisrael in 1915 aboard the U. S. Vulcan. He founded and equipped Hadassahs Child Health Welfare Stations and, during a visit to Eretz Yisrael in 1923-1924, established the Nathan and Lina Straus Health Center in Jerusalem (he returned to Eretz Yisrael in 1927 at an advanced age to lay its cornerstone, and he turned the building over to Hadassah in 1929) and later a similar Health Center in Tel Aviv.

All his life, Straus corresponded with Jewish leaders in support of Jewish claims to Eretz Yisrael and the welfare of its Jews. For example, in this remarkable December 18, 1929, correspondence written a few years before his death to Rav Avraham Isaac Kook, then Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Eretz Yisrael, he writes:

I refer to my cable of December 14th, reading as follows:

My heart goes out to you in greatest admiration for your testimony in public. Every fair-minded person will agree with you.

I have read with great pleasure the courageous and wise manner in which you answered the cross-examination.

Dont let this whole sad affair worry you. I feel confident that everything, with G-ds help, will come out all right in the end.

With warmest greetings, very cordially your friend, Nathan Straus

Straus is referring to Rav Kooks brilliant and emotional testimony before the Shaw Commission board of inquiry led by Sir Walter Shaw, which was established to investigate the responsibility for the Arab riots of August 1929. Rav Kook made a commanding case for the Jewish right to the Kotel and declared that the British government has the duty to abolish the humiliating conditions to which Jews praying there are subjected. With the Shulchan Aruch in hand, he discussed Tisha BAv and Yom Kippur practices as pertaining to the Kotel, and he reportedly held the rapt attention of the Commission as he explained Jewish Messianic beliefs regarding rebuilding the Temple. He completed his testimony by reading the warning letter that had been sent to him by the Moslem Committee for the Defense of the Mosque of Aksa in which the Jews were threatened with dire consequences if they continue to claim more than the limited right to visit the Kotel in silence.

Among other things, Straus was an early promoter of equal rights for African-Americans; witness this February 7, 1928, correspondence on his Pasteurized Milk Laboratories letterhead in which he writes to Mrs. Marion Colvin Deane at the Hampton Institute that I am also very much interested in colored people, and have no doubt that you are doing good work for them. The goal of the Institute, which Straus supported, was to educate Black students as leaders and teachers including, among others, Booker T. Washington.

Over and above his public welfare efforts on behalf of milk pasteurization and preventing tuberculosis, Strauss largesse and contributions were by no means limited to Jewish institutions and causes. For example, he donated an ice plant for soldiers suffering in Santiago, Cuba, during the Spanish-American War (1898); opened homeless shelters for 64,000 people, who could get a bed and breakfast for five cents; provided 50,000 meals for one cent each to those who could not afford more; sent food, clothing and medical supplies for the victims of the Messina earthquake (1909); and, on the eve of the U.S. entry into World War I, he sold his yacht, the Sisilina, to the Coast Guard and used the proceeds to feed war orphans (1916).

After the war, he fed returning American servicemen at Battery Park; donated the use of land in Lakewood, New Jersey, for the erection of Red Cross and army hospital buildings to the government (1918); presented a model dairy to the National Farm School in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, and provided for the free distribution of pasteurized milk to soldiers and sailors (1918); donated money to the New York Public Library for American youth (the Young Peoples Collection at the Donnell Library Center is named for him); and helped the citys poor by building a recreational pier, the first of many on the citys waterfront.

In the wake of the July 1927 earthquake that shook Eretz Yisrael, he immediately cabled $25,000 to Jerusalem, specifically stipulating that it was to be used for all the sufferers from the disaster without regard to race, creed, or nationality. He also made a point to support the Arabs in Eretz Yisrael, including substantial gifts to a Moslem orphanage in Jerusalem and to the poor.

In 1923, when the 25th anniversary of the creation of greater New York was celebrated, Straus was chosen by popular vote as the citizen who had made the greatest contribution to the citys public welfare. His 70th, 75th (see exhibit), and 80th birthday (when he announced that if the true friends of Zion would show their affection for me, and if they want to afford me genuine joy on my eightieth birthday, they will intensify their aid in the cause of the rebuilding of Palestine) were celebrated across the United States. President Taft characterized dear old Nathan Straus as a great Jew and the greatest Christian of us all, and the Grand Old Man of American Jewry.

Straus died on January 11, 1931, in Manhattan. He was interred at Beth El Cemetery in Ridgewood, Queens, with some 3,500 people packing Temple Emanuel for his funeral service and more than 7,000 more standing outside.

At a dinner in his honor twenty years earlier, he gave what could have been his own eulogy:

I often think of the old saying, The world is my country, to do good is my religion This has often been an inspiration to me. I might say, Humanity is my kin, to save babies is my religion. It is a religion I hope will have thousands of followers.

The modern city of Netanya (founded in 1927) is named for him, as is Jerusalems Rechov Straus, and President Taft hailed him as the greatest Jew of the previous quarter century.

Go here to see the original:
Nathan Straus: Shtadlan Extraordinaire, Zionist, And The 'American Pasteur' - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Germany to give Holocaust survivors in Israel an extra $238 each because of the war – JTA News – Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Posted By on April 11, 2024

(JTA) Holocaust survivors in Israel relived their trauma on Oct. 7, when Hamas attack on their country was the deadliest day for Jews since the Nazis were defeated. Some were injured, hid for their lives and were displaced from their homes, in echoes of their experiences as children.

Now, they will get a lump-sum payment from the organization that negotiates reparations from Germany as a show of solidarity in the wake of the attack.

The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany announced on Tuesday that it is allocating 25 million Euros in a one-time payment for survivors in Israel. The Solidarity Fund for Israel will yield about 220 Euros ($238) for each of the roughly 120,000 survivors in the country.

The payment follows a different one-time stipend given in December to Israeli survivors who were evacuated from their homes following the Oct. 7 attack. It also comes on top of the total amount that Germany agreed to pay survivors and related organizations this year more than $1.4 billion, the most ever in a reflection of the high costs of caring for elderly survivors.

Supporting Holocaust survivors is always our number one concern. Immediately following the horrific attacks of October 7, we began working to ensure every survivor was first safe, then secure in a location where they could be comfortable, and to ensure that they have financial support while the conflict continues, Claims Conference President Gideon Taylor said in a statement. This additional symbolic acknowledgment payment by Germany to Holocaust survivors in Israel is a message of solidarity.

A spokesperson for the Claims Conference said it had announced the payment only in Israel to avoid creating confusion for survivors who live elsewhere. According to an analysis the organization released in January, the most detailed of its kind, half of all remaining survivors live in Israel, followed by 18% each in North America and Western Europe and 12% in the former Soviet Union.

Link:

Germany to give Holocaust survivors in Israel an extra $238 each because of the war - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Lena Dunham finds out her family’s Holocaust history – The Jewish Chronicle

Posted By on April 11, 2024

Lena Dunham made the emotional discovery that her family has connections to the Holocaust during last weeks episode of the PBS celebrity genealogy series Finding Your Roots.

Historian and host Henry Louis Gates Jr. revealed that Dunhams great-great-grandmother Regina Seltenwirth came to the US alone at just 14 years old, leaving 11 siblings behind in Europe. Gates explained that one of Reginas brothers, Moses, moved with his family to Hungary around the time that WWII began; the family was separated, and his daughter Ilona was sent to the Nazi-occupied city of Kamianets-Podilskyi where she is believed to have been one of roughly 24,000 Jews who were massacred over the course of two days in August 1941.

Its an incredibly painful thing to think about people with whom I share probably not just DNA but, you know, features and emotional responses and an approach to life those people being placed in this situation and having their lives extinguished this way, Dunham said. I dont think there is a way to reckon with it. Its too big and the whole act is too vast. But to see a personal connection to it literalises it in a way that is very, very powerful.

Dunham, 37, whose mother is Jewish, stars in the upcoming film Treasure in which she plays a young woman confronting her familys Holocaust history, and her discovery on Finding Your Rootsproved the Jewish actor and writer of the hit HBO series Girlshas more in common with her character than shed previously known.

Gates went on to explain that the names of Moses, his wife and their son later appeared on a list of living Hungarian Jews compiled by Allied soldiers at the end of the war, and Ilona's name was notably missing.

Its an amazing thing to see those names, and to know that theyre a part of our family, Dunham said. But to also know that they had to spend the rest of their lives with this other person who was so important to them missing, and wondering about her fate, must have made surviving a very complicated thing.

Dunham, who appeared on last Tuesdays episode alongside Jewish actor Michael Douglas, also learned that she is a distant relative of Curb Your Enthusiasmstar Larry David. Gates explained that David is a cousin through Dunhams mother, Laurie Simmons. According to the shows DNA analysis, David shares multiple long identical segments of DNA with Dunham and her mother.

This means that you share at least one common ancestor somewhere on your mother's side of your family tree, Gates added.

Dunham was delighted by the news: This is incredible. You saved the best for last.

Finding Your Rootshas featured a number of Jewish celebrities who explored previously unknown Jewish family histories, including Alanis Morissette, Pamela Adlon, David Duchovny, Dustin Hoffman and others.

Read more:

Lena Dunham finds out her family's Holocaust history - The Jewish Chronicle


Page 16«..10..15161718..3040..»

matomo tracker