Jewish American Heritage Month

Posted By admin on May 25, 2021

Eleven million men, women, and children perished during the systematic, Nazi state-sponsored persecution and murder of Jews, Slavic peoples, Roma, people with disabilities, Soviet prisoners, homosexuals, and others deemed inferior. Of those, more than six million were Jews.

The way in which one traditionally views the Holocaust is inevitably through the lens of the victim. However, director Luke Holland, driven by his own familys connection to the horrific period surrounding World War II, attempted to explore a seldom investigated narrative that of the perpetrator.

Filmed over the course of a decade, Hollands Final Account is a stirring oral history of the individual motivations, actions, and attempted justifications of those who perpetrated the Shoah, according to the USC Shoah Foundation.

Although Holland died from brain cancer last year at the age of 71, his final work remains a living testament to his lifelong desire to preserve an important narrative largely missing from the historiography of the Holocaust.

Prior to the theatrical May 21 release of Final Account, the films associate producer Sam Pope and Dr. Stephen Smith, executive director of the USC Shoah Foundation, spoke with Military Times about the late directors final project and one of the last portraits of participants who served under Adolf Hitlers Final Solution.

You interviewed more than 300 people over the course of 10 years for this film. Was there a particular moment that stood out to you? Were there any that didnt make it into the film?

Smith: One piece that didnt make it into the documentary was a remarkable moment in documentary filmmaking. There was a former SS member being filmed by Luke. At one point he was asked the question about whether he was a perpetrator much like we saw in the documentary and the individual burst out in anger.

Get the military's most comprehensive news and information every morning

(please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Subscribe

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Early Bird Brief.

How dare you defile the name of the Fuhrer!

He went on this tirade and was demanding that Luke turn off the camera. Luke didnt. He just sat there and watched. After a few minutes his tirade died down and the guy just sat back in his chair and started to speak about what he was involved in.

Another striking moment was when he was interviewing the stenographer who had been involved in medical experiments at Sachsenhausen concentration camp. He visited her three times. He already knew on the first occasion that she had been involved in medical experiments, but he didnt disclose that to her. On the first meeting she tells him she nothing to do with it. By the time he gets to the third meeting he says to her, You know, on the second occasion, you said that your boss would go to Sachsenhausen. What did he do there? Did you ever go?

No, I was never there, she maintained.

Luke then goes, Well thats strange because I have this document that describes the medical experiments, and it seems to have your signature on it as the stenographer. Could you possibly have been there?

And she said, Oh, yeah, I would go with him and take notes.

We wouldnt have this material without Lukes ability to be able to find, talk to, and extract this remarkable information.

Pope: One of the most fascinating interviews was with Herbert Fuchs, the SS man sworn in at the Feldherrnhalle on Kristallnacht. The way he reflects in the film to the questions that Luke is asking, its almost as though he is considering them for the first time. Now, whether that is necessarily true or not is up to the audience to determine.

Since World War II, many myths have emerged of the good German, that no one knew anything, or the line, We were just following orders. How do you think Luke challenged these in this film?

Smith: I think what Luke was trying to show was that the people who committed the Holocaust were not monsters, that the people who made the decisions to join the SS or carry out their orders were human beings, and that they are human beings afterwards, too.

Those 10-year-olds who signed up to join the Hitler Youth could not have known they were joining what ultimately became a criminal organization. They were just kids wanting to be in a uniform, to be part of a peer group, and be part of something great in Germany. When you think about it in that way, I think I probably would have joined.

Thats Lukes point, that they were not so extraordinary. But weve got to be on guard, because otherwise, we might end up as 90-year-olds wondering how on earth we got ourselves into such a mess.

I will finish to say there is no excuse for their behavior. There was one gentleman in the film who said, I was a guard at Sachsenhausen, but I dont consider myself a perpetrator. But when you put it like that maybe I was.

I think thats disingenuous. They were very aware of what they were part of. I dont buy that bit of their narrative, nor should they be excused from it. But it is interesting to see, even as a 90-year-old, how he justifies how he got there, why he did what he did, and how he wasnt responsible. I think that is really instructive in terms of what were like as human beings and what we need to be on guard for.

Pope: I think these issues you raised were very much in the forefront of Lukes mind. His journey was motivated by a personal desire to understand how this could happen the murder of his own grandparents, the fact that his mother had to flee Austria to protect herself and the lives of her children. He wanted to know how much truth these myths held.

The common refrain we heard was after the war or we didnt know. Through these interviews we start to interrogate those lies. I think we start to see the fractures in this sort of monolith of myth. There is no consensus among individual narratives, and part of the film is trying to demonstrate that, even among the interviewees and perpetrators, there is not necessarily an agreement.

There is the famous quote, The only thing necessary for triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. What struck me most in the film was the mental contortions many of the subjects went through to justify their behavior. How far would you go in claiming the complicity of the German people?

Smith: I often have this conversation with colleagues, because when Im discussing this period, I talk about Germany unless Im specifically talking about something that the Nazi Party did. The reason is that it wasnt the Nazis that developed Auschwitz. It was Germany. It wasnt the Nazis that shot Jews into ditches. It was Germany. The fact that the Nazi Party was controlling Germany comes down to the fact that German citizens voted for Adolf Hitler in 1933. Hitler was appointed the chancellor of the Weimar Republic. And yes, he took over and became a dictator, but he was put there by the German population.

People tend to get a little anxious, saying, You cant blame all Germans. Im not blaming all Germans; Im saying that the country committed the crime. And therefore, the citizens of the country are responsible to apprehend those if they do not agree with it.

We have to be accountable for our actions. Its the will of the people that ultimately decides a nations fate, and if we dont like it, we better prevent it, because otherwise it will go down in history.

Pope: I was just reading through some of Lukes notes and he found himself asking this question again and again. Where does this perpetration begin? The framework through which weve tried to determine this has largely been a judicial one. We framed it through law, whether one has committed a crime. But then there is the question of complicity. Is silence tacit support?

I think it would be inaccurate to say that everyone knew the entire scope of what was being carried out in front of them. However, it became clearer and clearer during the interview process how much people did know. There was a greater awareness, and not just of anti-Semitism, criminal acts, or people being deported. News spread as men came back from the front, from the killing fields, from the sites of mass murders. Those rumors spread everywhere.

I think we must acknowledge that perhaps perpetration, not necessarily direct criminality, but perpetration begins much earlier and in more subtle ways.

How reticent were the films subjects to speak with you? Was there openness or were they less inclined to explore their own culpability after so many years?

Pope: There were many potential interviewees who decided they did not want to revisit the past. However, we found many who welcomed the opportunity. There were some who wanted to share, but perhaps didnt want to explore their own personal history.

It was interesting seeing how we always started off with childhood, when things were sort of innocent, and then they could then build. It was a matter of following those threads, allowing them to construct their past before you. Luke, being as well-researched as possible, was able to pull on those little threads.

In the film, a German medic states pointedly, What is not in the archives does not exist. The Germans were notoriously meticulous in their accounting, so for me that notion is chilling. How will Final Account bring to light some of what had been previously buried?

Smith: The missing story has been that of those who committed the crimes, and I think the genius of Final Account is the fact that it gives us a gateway into understanding what the process was for individuals who became a part of a criminal organization, and how they lived their lives.

It also gives us the entry point to the archive as a whole. We see the complexity, we see the deception, we see the disingenuous behavior, but we also get a sense of how things happened, who they became, and how it was possible.

Theres another clip not in the film but on our website of a policeman guiding traffic while Jews are walking by and going to the train station. Heres this guy who wasnt putting the Jews on the train but has becomes this eyewitness to history. Its not from the Jewish perspective of being taken to the train station. Hes a German witness. That helps us defeat denial.

A survey done last year by the Claims Conference found that there was a disturbing lack of Holocaust knowledge among Millennials and Gen Z. How do you hope Final Account reaches those with little awareness of the war or genocide?

Smith: I believe when teaching about the Holocaust, knowledge is not the only indicator. Do these young people know about Hiroshima, or how many African slaves were brought to America, or what the Jim Crow laws were?

I think you have to test all of those things to see whether or not the issue is in terms of historical knowledge. I think its best taught with context, which is why the USC Shoah Foundation is involved in this film to provide context that allows someone to explore this safely. But I think its extremely instructive to be able to show that if this can happen in Germany, it can happen anywhere. So, lets learn those lessons while we can.

Pope: For younger audiences, this history can feel far removed. What I hope this film accomplishes is that it encourages people to ask the question of, When do I become a perpetrator? Have I become one in my own way? How do I spot those warning signs?

I dont expect anyone to have those answers right away, but to at least have that thought bubbling is hugely important.

See the original post:

Surviving members of Hitler's Third Reich speak in chilling new documentary 'Final Account' - Military Times

Category: Shoah
Tags: